In Vivo Biochemical Tagging: Mapping Cellular Activity History for Advanced Biomedical Research

Abstract

This article explores the rapidly evolving field of in vivo biochemical tagging, a set of revolutionary techniques that enable the permanent recording of transient cellular activity. Aimed at researchers, scientists, and drug development professionals, we cover the foundational principles of tools like Ca2+-activated split-TurboID (CaST) and proximity labeling enzymes. The scope extends from core concepts and methodological applications—including mapping neural circuits and subcellular proteomes—to practical troubleshooting and a comparative evaluation of tagging technologies. By synthesizing key advancements and validation strategies, this resource provides a comprehensive guide for implementing these powerful methods to decipher complex biological processes in live animals and drive innovation in therapeutic discovery.

The Foundations of Cellular Activity Tagging: From Calcium Signaling to Permanent Recording

Calcium ions (Ca²⁺) are ubiquitous intracellular signaling particles that trigger vital reactions across all major types of eukaryotic cells [1]. The fundamental principle that makes calcium an ideal proxy for cellular activity lies in its rapid flux across the cytoplasmic membrane during action potentials and other activation events [2]. This flux creates measurable changes in intracellular calcium concentration that correlate strongly with neuronal firing and general cellular activation [3] [2]. The universality of calcium signaling extends beyond neuroscience to include essential processes such as muscle contraction, hormone secretion, gene expression, and cellular growth [1] [2]. This broad relevance, combined with the development of increasingly sophisticated detection technologies, establishes calcium as the premier biomarker for tagging and recording cellular activity history in living organisms.

The brain's ability to initiate and orchestrate diverse behavioral outcomes relies on precisely timed calcium dynamics across billions of cells [4]. Calcium serves as a "universal second messenger" involved in various cellular signaling events, including neuronal activity [4]. Its concentration fluctuations correlate so strongly with neuronal activity that calcium imaging has become a gold standard for assessing neuronal activity and studying neuronal networks [3]. This relationship forms the foundation for modern approaches to dissecting behaviorally relevant cells and circuits, which is essential for understanding the neural basis of behavior in both health and disease [4].

Quantitative Comparison of Calcium-Based Activity Monitoring Technologies

Table 1: Comparison of Calcium-Based Activity Recording Methodologies

Technology	Temporal Resolution	Spatial Resolution	Activity Integration Time	Key Advantages	Primary Limitations
CaST (Ca²⁺-activated split-TurboID) [5]	Immediate readout after labeling	Cellular	10-minute labeling windows	Non-invasive; no light required; immediate biochemical tagging	Requires biotin delivery
GCaMP GECIs [3] [2]	Milliseconds to seconds	Cellular (subcellular with two-photon)	Real-time monitoring	High temporal resolution; genetically targetable	Requires light delivery; transient signal
Transcriptional Reporters (FLARE, Cal-Light) [5] [4]	6-18 hours for detection	Cellular	Light-gated windows (minutes)	Stable, permanent tagging	Slow onset; requires blue/UV light
IEG-Based Reporters (TRAP2, tetTag) [5] [4]	1-2 hours for protein detection	Cellular	Drug-gated windows (~hours)	Drug-gated instead of light-gated	Slow onset; not universal Ca²⁺ readout
CaMPARI [5]	Minutes	Cellular	Light-converted permanent mark	Permanent photoconversion	Requires ultraviolet light

Table 2: Performance Metrics of Calcium Imaging Modalities

Imaging Method	Depth Penetration	Temporal Resolution	Field of View	Best Application Context
Two-Photon Microscopy [3]	Up to 1 mm	Seconds (cellular resolution)	Single FOV (~500 μm)	Cellular resolution in specific brain regions
Wide-Field Imaging [3]	Cortical surface	<50 ms	Entire cortex	Network connectivity across broad regions
Fiber Photometry [6]	Deep brain structures	Milliseconds (population signal)	~200-400 μm diameter	Population-level dynamics in deep nuclei
Head-Mounted Microscopes [2]	Superficial regions with GRIN lenses	Seconds	Single FOV	Cellular resolution in freely moving animals

The CaST Revolution: Biochemical Tagging of Cellular Activity History

The recent development of Ca²⁺-activated split-TurboID (CaST) represents a groundbreaking advancement in biochemical tagging of cellular activity history in vivo [5]. This enzyme-catalyzed approach rapidly tags cells with elevated Ca²⁺ levels within 10 minutes using an exogenously delivered biotin molecule [5] [7]. The CaST system functions as an engineered enzyme that attaches a small, biochemical handle to activated cells exhibiting high intracellular Ca²⁺, effectively creating a permanent biochemical record of transient calcium activity [5].

The fundamental design tethers the Ca²⁺-binding protein calmodulin (CaM) and a CaM-binding synthetic peptide M13 variant to either inactive half of split-TurboID [5]. Under high cytosolic Ca²⁺ concentrations, the CaM fragment recruits to M13, resulting in reconstitution and activation of split-TurboID. With simultaneous biotin supplementation, the reconstituted enzyme then biotinylates itself and nearby proteins in a Ca²⁺-dependent manner [5]. This elegant coincidence detection ensures that neither high Ca²⁺ alone (due to low endogenous biotin levels) nor exogenous biotin alone (due to inactive, separated fragments) produces significant signal, enabling precise temporal control over the activity tagging window [5].

Experimental Protocol: Implementing CaST for Neuronal Activity Tagging

Materials Required:

• CaST plasmid constructs (CD4-sTb(C)-M13-GFP and CaM-V5-sTb(N))
• Appropriate viral vector (AAV, lentivirus) for delivery
• Biotin (membrane-permeable variant)
• Stereotaxic surgery equipment
• Fixation and staining reagents (streptavidin conjugated to Alexa Fluor 647)

Procedure:

• Delivery of CaST Constructs: Co-express both components of CaST in target cells. The optimized 5:2 ratio of CD4-sTb(C)-M13-GFP to CaM-V5-sTb(N) provides highest signal-to-background ratio [5]. For in vivo applications, use stereotaxic injection of viral vectors into the target brain region.
• Activity Labeling Window: Systemically administer biotin (10-30 mg/kg) immediately before or during the behavioral paradigm of interest. The labeling window can be as brief as 10 minutes [5].
• Tissue Processing and Analysis: Sacrifice animals and perfuse with fixative at the desired time point post-labeling. Process tissue for immunohistochemistry using fluorescently conjugated streptavidin to detect biotinylated proteins [5].
• Downstream Analysis: Identify tagged cells via fluorescence microscopy. Biotinylation enables additional applications including protein purification and proteomic analysis of activated cells [5].

Key Validation Steps:

• Confirm Ca²⁺-dependent and biotin-dependent labeling in control experiments
• Verify optimal expression ratio of CaST components (5:2)
• Test reversibility by washing out Ca²⁺ before biotin delivery (should eliminate signal) [5]

Diagram 1: CaST Mechanism - Biochemical tagging of cellular activity. Short title: CaST calcium activity tagging mechanism.

Established Calcium Imaging Methodologies for Activity Monitoring

Genetically Encoded Calcium Indicators (GECIs)

The GCaMP family of GECIs represents the current gold standard for calcium imaging in neuroscience research [3] [2]. These indicators rapidly switch between non-fluorescent and fluorescent states in response to changing Ca²⁺ levels, making them ideal for measuring calcium fluctuations in genetically targeted cell populations [3]. The most recent variants, GCaMP6 and GCaMP7, offer sufficient signal-to-noise ratio to detect single, isolated action potentials with temporal resolution in the high millisecond range [2].

Experimental Protocol: Two-Photon Calcium Imaging in Awake Behaving Mice

Table 3: Essential Research Reagent Solutions for Calcium Imaging

Reagent/Category	Specific Examples	Function	Application Notes
Genetically Encoded Calcium Indicators	GCaMP6f, GCaMP7s, RCaMP2	Fluorescent Ca²⁺ sensing	GCaMP6f for fast kinetics; target to specific cell types using Cre lines [6] [2]
Viral Vectors	AAV2/5, AAV2/9, Lentivirus	Deliver GECIs to target cells	AAV serotypes determine tropism; use cell-specific promoters [6]
Surgical Components	GRIN lenses, optical fibers, dental cement	Provide optical access to brain regions	GRIN lenses for deep brain imaging; chronic implant stability critical [2]
Annotation Software	Track2p, Suite2p	Automated cell tracking across sessions	Track2p specifically handles developmental brain growth [8]

Materials Required:

• Transgenic mice expressing GCaMP in neurons of interest OR viral vectors for GCaMP delivery
• Two-photon microscope system
• Stereotaxic surgery equipment
• Head-plate for head-fixation during imaging
• Awake animal imaging setup with behavioral monitoring

Procedure:

• GCaMP Expression: Use transgenic mouse lines (e.g., GCaMP6f under CaMKIIα promoter for excitatory neurons) or stereotaxically inject AAV vectors carrying GCaMP under cell-type specific promoters [3].
• Cranial Window Installation: Under anesthesia, perform craniotomy over the target brain region and implant a cranial window (cover glass) sealed with dental cement for chronic optical access [3] [2].
• Habituation: Gradually acclimate mice to head-fixation under the microscope while awake, with increasing duration over 3-5 sessions.
• Imaging During Behavior: Collect calcium imaging data while mice perform behavioral tasks. For two-photon imaging, typical parameters include 920 nm excitation wavelength, 512×512 pixel resolution, and 5-30 Hz frame rate depending on the experimental needs [3].
• Data Processing: Extract calcium transients using automated algorithms (e.g., CNMF, Suite2p) to identify regions of interest (ROIs) corresponding to individual neurons and derive their fluorescence traces (ΔF/F) [8].

Key Considerations:

• Maintain consistent focus and positioning across longitudinal imaging sessions
• For developmental studies, use specialized tracking algorithms like Track2p that account for brain growth and morphological changes [8]
• Control for potential confounding effects of anesthetics by imaging in awake animals [3]

Fiber Photometry for Population-Level Calcium Dynamics

Fiber photometry enables recording of population-level calcium dynamics from deep brain structures in freely behaving animals [6]. This approach sacrifices single-cell resolution but provides excellent temporal resolution for monitoring ensemble activity in specific neuronal populations.

Experimental Protocol: Dual-Color Fiber Photometry

Materials Required:

• Dual-color fiber photometry system
• Optical fibers (200-400 μm core diameter)
• Dichroic mirrors and appropriate filter sets
• Viruses expressing calcium indicators (e.g., GCaMP for neurons)

Procedure:

• Virus Injection and Fiber Implantation: Stereotaxically inject AAV vectors expressing GCaMP under cell-type specific promoters (e.g., Oxt-Cre mice with Cre-dependent GCaMP for oxytocin neurons) [6]. Simultaneously implant an optical fiber positioned above the injection site.
• Signal Acquisition: Connect the implanted fiber to the photometry system via a patch cord. Record fluorescence signals (470 nm excitation for GCaMP) and isosbestic control signals (405 nm excitation) simultaneously to control for motion artifacts and autofluorescence [6].
• Behavioral Synchronization: Synchronize calcium recordings with behavioral tracking and stimulus presentations using TTL pulses or similar synchronization methods.
• Data Analysis: Calculate ΔF/F by normalizing the 470 nm signal to the 405 nm reference signal. Use z-scoring or similar methods to quantify response magnitudes relative to baseline periods [6].

Diagram 2: Fiber photometry workflow for population calcium dynamics. Short title: Fiber photometry calcium recording workflow.

Applications in Drug Development and Neuroscience Research

Calcium-based activity monitoring has proven particularly valuable in pharmaceutical development and disease modeling. The technology enables longitudinal assessments of efficacy and mode of action for compounds targeting neuronal populations [3]. For example, calcium imaging has revealed how psychedelics alter cortical network dynamics and how oxytocin neurons coordinate social and stress responses [3] [6].

In addiction research, calcium imaging has illuminated how alcohol and drugs of abuse dysregulate neural circuit function to produce maladaptive behaviors [2]. The ability to observe these changes in real-time in specific cell populations provides unprecedented insight into the circuit basis of addiction pathology. Similarly, in neurodevelopmental disorders, longitudinal tracking of calcium dynamics can identify deviations from normal developmental trajectories [8].

The application of calcium imaging to study astrocyte-neuron interactions represents another frontier in understanding circuit function. Recent work has demonstrated functional coupling between oxytocin neurons and astrocytes in the paraventricular nucleus during specific behavioral states, revealing previously unappreciated complexity in circuit regulation [6].

Calcium continues to prove itself as the ideal proxy for cellular activity due to its universal role in signaling, the temporal precision with which it reports activity, and the continually evolving toolkit for its detection and manipulation. The recent development of CaST technology represents a significant advancement by providing a non-invasive, rapid biochemical tagging method that creates a permanent record of transient calcium activity [5].

The most powerful research approaches will likely combine multiple calcium monitoring technologies—using GECIs for real-time activity observation during behavior and CaST for permanent tagging of activated ensembles for subsequent connectivity and molecular analysis. This integrated approach leverages the respective strengths of each methodology while compensating for their individual limitations.

As calcium monitoring technologies continue to evolve, we can anticipate further improvements in temporal resolution, target specificity, and compatibility with behavioral paradigms. These advancements will deepen our understanding of neural circuit function in health and disease, ultimately accelerating the development of targeted therapeutics for neurological and psychiatric disorders.

In the study of dynamic cellular processes, particularly within living organisms, fluorescent sensors and reporters have long been the cornerstone of live imaging approaches. These tools, including genetically encoded calcium indicators and fluorescent proteins, enable researchers to detect activated cells with elevated ion concentrations such as calcium (Ca²⁺) [9]. However, these approaches present significant limitations for long-term behavioral studies in freely moving animals. Traditional fluorescent sensors provide only transient readouts and generally require invasive implants to deliver light to deep brain structures, fundamentally restricting their noninvasive application [9]. Furthermore, these methods capture only momentary cellular activity, making it challenging to correlate activity history with other cellular properties such as spatial localization, RNA expression, or protein expression [9].

The limitations extend beyond technical constraints to fundamental biological questions. While transcriptional reporters like TRAP2 and tetTag utilize drug injection instead of light to gate the activity labeling window, they face their own challenges. Immediate early gene (IEG)-based activity has been linked to neural activity, but it is not as universal a readout as Ca²⁺ signaling [9]. More critically, the slow onset of IEG expression—requiring several hours (~6–18 hours) before sufficient reporter protein can be detected—limits researchers' ability to immediately tag and identify neurons activated during specific time windows [9]. This temporal delay creates a fundamental disconnect between cellular activation and its permanent recording, driving the critical need for alternative tagging strategies that are both permanent and non-invasive.

Emerging Paradigms in Biochemical Tagging

The CaST System: A Revolutionary Approach

A groundbreaking advancement in this field comes from the development of Ca²⁺-activated split-TurboID (CaST), an enzyme-catalyzed system that rapidly and biochemically tags cells with elevated Ca²⁺ levels in vivo [9]. This system represents a paradigm shift from optical to biochemical tagging, addressing core limitations of previous technologies.

The CaST system functions through a sophisticated molecular design that reengineers the proximity-labeling enzyme split-TurboID to report increased intracellular Ca²⁺. The basic design tethers the Ca²⁺-binding protein calmodulin (CaM) and a CaM-binding synthetic peptide M13 variant to either inactive half of split-TurboID [9]. Under high cytosolic Ca²⁺ concentrations, the CaM fragment recruits to M13, resulting in reconstitution and activation of split-TurboID. Upon simultaneous biotin supplementation, the reconstituted enzyme then biotinylates itself and nearby proteins in a Ca²⁺-dependent manner [9].

Table 1: Key Characteristics of the CaST Tagging System

Parameter	Specification	Experimental Validation
Tagging Time	Within 10 minutes of elevated Ca²⁺	HEK293T cells and neuronal systems [9]
Signal Mechanism	Enzymatic biotinylation	Streptavidin-Alexa Fluor 647 detection [9]
Dependency	Coincidence detection of exogenous biotin + high intracellular Ca²⁺	Minimal background with biotin or Ca²⁺ alone [9]
Reversibility	Fully reversible upon Ca²⁺ reduction	No biotinylation after Ca²⁺ washout [9]
Signal Integration	Time-gated integrator of total Ca²⁺ activity	Increases with Ca²⁺ concentration and biotin labeling time [9]

The CaST system demonstrates several transformative features. It enables rapid tagging of activated cells within 10 minutes of elevated Ca²⁺ with an exogenously delivered biotin molecule [9]. Unlike transcriptional reporters that require hours to produce signal, the CaST readout can be performed immediately after activity labeling [9]. Furthermore, the enzymatic signal increases with both Ca²⁺ concentration and biotin labeling time, demonstrating that CaST functions as a time-gated integrator of total Ca²⁺ activity rather than a momentary snapshot [9].

Comparative Analysis of Tagging Modalities

The field of cellular tagging encompasses diverse strategies, broadly categorized into direct and indirect labeling approaches. Direct labeling involves "directly connecting" the tracer with target cells through methods such as endocytosis, transporter-mediated uptake, or metabolic trapping [10]. While this approach facilitates high target-to-background ratios and immediate observation after injection, it suffers from significant limitations including tracer dilution through cell division, signal attenuation over time, and inability to distinguish between living and dead cells [10].

In contrast, indirect labeling utilizes genetic manipulation to make cells carry specific markers, typically through genomic integration methods including cell transfection, TALEN, or CRISPR/Cas systems [10]. This strategy offers the decisive advantage of permanent marking, as the genetic modification passes to progeny cells through genome replication [10]. However, this method requires initial genetic modification of cells and systematic administration of tracers for detection, which can generate background signals [10].

Table 2: Comparison of Cellular Tagging Strategies

Tagging Method	Mechanism	Temporal Resolution	Permanence	Invasiveness
Fluorescent Sensors	Optical detection of ion flux	Milliseconds to seconds	Transient	High (often requires fiber implants) [9]
Transcriptional Reporters	Activity-dependent gene expression	6-18 hours	Permanent (via genetic modification)	Variable (drug injection required) [9]
Direct Labeling	Tracer internalization	Immediate	Days (dilutes with division)	Low (but limited temporal window) [10]
CaST System	Ca²⁺-dependent enzymatic tagging	10 minutes	Permanent (biotinylation mark)	Low (biotin crosses blood-brain barrier) [9]

Research Reagent Solutions

The implementation of advanced tagging methodologies requires specialized reagents and tools. The following table outlines key resources for establishing these systems in research settings.

Table 3: Essential Research Reagents for Advanced Cellular Tagging

Reagent/Tool	Function	Example Applications
CaST Plasmids	Bicistronic vector expressing both CaST fragments	Neuronal activity tagging in behaving animals [11]
HaloTag Ligands	Covalent labeling of HaloTag fusion proteins	Single-particle tracking of PAR-3 clusters in C. elegans [12]
Split-TurboID Components	Proximity-dependent biotinylation	CaST system for calcium-dependent labeling [9]
Janelia Fluor Dyes	High quantum yield fluorescent labels	Sparse labeling for single-molecule tracking [12]
Biotin	Small molecule tag for enzymatic labeling	Substrate for CaST-mediated protein biotinylation [9]

Experimental Protocols

CaST System Implementation for Neuronal Activity Tagging

Materials:

• CaST-IRES plasmid (e.g., pAAV-Syn-CD4-sTC-M13-GFP-IRES-CaM-V5-sTN from Addgene #219782) [11]
• Biotin solution (prepared fresh)
• Appropriate viral packaging system (e.g., AAV for neuronal expression)
• Streptavidin-conjugated detection reagent (e.g., SA-647)

Procedure:

• System Delivery: Introduce the CaST system into target cells. For neuronal applications, utilize cell-type specific promoters (e.g., synapsin for neurons) and deliver via AAV transduction [9] [11].
• Activity Labeling: Administer biotin systemically during the behavioral or stimulation window of interest. Biotin crosses the blood-brain barrier, enabling non-invasive tagging [9].
• Tissue Processing: After the desired labeling period (as short as 10 minutes), euthanize the animal and perfuse with fixative.
• Signal Detection: Process tissue for streptavidin-based detection using fluorescent or enzymatic methods. The biotinylated proteins remain stable for subsequent analysis [9].
• Downstream Analysis: Combine CaST labeling with additional techniques such as immunohistochemistry, RNA sequencing, or anatomical tracing to correlate activity history with other cellular properties [9].

Sparse Labeling with HaloTag for Single-Molecule Tracking

Materials:

• HaloTagged cell line or organism
• Janelia Fluor 585 and Janelia Fluor 646 ligands
• Polylysine-coated imaging chambers
• Live-cell imaging setup with TIRF capability

Procedure:

• Ligand Preparation: Resuspend dried dye aliquots in DMSO to create stock solutions. Prepare working concentrations in appropriate physiological buffers [12].
• Sparse Labeling: Incubate cells with a mixture of two different HaloTag ligand dyes at concentrations that label only a subset of the total protein population [12].
• Image Acquisition: Perform time-lapse imaging using a dual-view TIRF microscope with appropriate excitation wavelengths and emission filters [12].
• Particle Tracking: Utilize tracking software such as Utrack to follow individual labeled particles over time [12].
• MSD Analysis: Calculate mean squared displacement using tools like MSDanalyzer to extract diffusion coefficients and classify particle behavior [12].

Signaling Pathways and Experimental Workflows

The following diagram illustrates the core mechanism of the CaST system and its advantage over traditional methods:

Applications and Future Directions

The implementation of permanent, non-invasive tagging technologies has already enabled groundbreaking applications in neuroscience and drug development. The CaST system, for instance, has been successfully used to tag prefrontal cortex neurons activated by psilocybin administration and correlate the CaST signal with psilocybin-induced head-twitch responses in untethered mice [9] [13]. This demonstrates the powerful utility of these methods for linking cellular activity with behavioral outputs in freely behaving animals without the constraints of tethered imaging setups.

For drug development professionals, these technologies offer unprecedented opportunities to track therapeutic cell distributions, persistence, and functional status in vivo. This is particularly valuable for emerging therapies such as CAR-T cells and stem cell restorative therapies, where understanding the in vivo dynamics of therapeutic cells is crucial for optimizing efficacy and predicting side effects [10] [14]. The ability to permanently tag cellular activity history enables researchers to address fundamental questions about which immune cell classes are present in tumors, how they migrate and proliferate, and how they respond to therapeutic interventions over extended timeframes [14].

Looking forward, the integration of these biochemical tagging methods with multi-omics approaches and advanced imaging modalities will further enhance our ability to decode complex cellular behaviors in intact biological systems. As these technologies evolve, they will undoubtedly become indispensable tools for unraveling the complexities of cellular communication in health and disease.

The study of dynamic cellular signaling events, particularly in deep tissues and freely behaving animals, has long presented significant methodological challenges for neuroscientists and cell biologists. Calcium (Ca2+) signaling serves as a universal mediator of cellular activation across biological systems, especially in neurons where it directly correlates with firing activity. While existing tools like fluorescent sensors and transcriptional reporters can detect activated cells, they face limitations including transient readouts, invasive implantation requirements for light delivery, and slow signal development over hours to days [9]. To overcome these constraints, researchers have developed a revolutionary approach that combines proximity labeling with calcium sensing: Ca2+-activated split-TurboID (CaST).

CaST represents a paradigm shift in cellular activity monitoring by enabling rapid, biochemical tagging of activated cells within minutes through an enzyme-catalyzed mechanism [9]. This technology leverages the power of split-TurboID - an engineered promiscuous biotin ligase that labels nearby proteins with biotin - but makes its activity conditional upon elevated intracellular calcium concentrations [9] [15]. Unlike transcription-based reporters that require 6-18 hours to produce detectable signal, CaST tagging occurs within 10 minutes of biotin delivery, allowing researchers to capture and preserve cellular activity history almost immediately after it occurs [9]. This temporal precision, combined with the non-invasive nature of biotin administration (which crosses the blood-brain barrier), positions CaST as a transformative tool for mapping neural circuits and cellular activation patterns in freely behaving animals under natural conditions.

Principles and Mechanism of CaST

Molecular Design and Engineering

The CaST system represents a sophisticated example of protein engineering that combines calcium-sensing domains with the catalytic activity of split-TurboID. At its core, CaST consists of two modular components derived from distinct biological systems:

• sTb(N) fragment: The N-terminal portion of split-TurboID fused to calmodulin (CaM), a calcium-binding protein that undergoes conformational changes upon calcium binding [9] [15]
• sTb(C) fragment: The C-terminal portion of split-TurboID fused to a M13 peptide, a calmodulin-binding domain derived from myosin light chain kinase [9] [15]

These fragments are strategically localized within cells to optimize function: the CD4-sTb(C)-M13-GFP construct is membrane-tethered, while CaM-V5-sTb(N) remains cytosolic [9]. This spatial arrangement facilitates proper interaction only when calcium signaling is activated. The split-TurboID enzyme itself is engineered from TurboID, which was developed through directed evolution to show dramatically higher activity than previous biotin ligases like BioID [16] [17]. TurboID generates reactive biotin-AMP that covalently tags nearby endogenous proteins, enabling subsequent purification and analysis [17].

Activation Mechanism and Coincidence Detection

CaST functions as a sophisticated coincidence detector that requires two simultaneous conditions for activation: elevated intracellular calcium and the presence of exogenous biotin [9] [15]. The activation mechanism proceeds through a precise sequence of molecular events:

• Calcium elevation in the cytosol triggers conformational changes in calmodulin
• Calmodulin-M13 binding brings the separated sTb(N) and sTb(C) fragments into proximity
• Enzyme reconstitution occurs through complementation of the split-TurboID fragments
• Biotin activation by the reconstituted TurboID generates reactive biotin-AMP
• Protein tagging of nearby endogenous proteins with biotin molecules

This dual requirement ensures temporal specificity, as biotinylation only occurs during the precise window when both conditions are met. The system shows remarkable reversibility - when calcium levels return to baseline, the fragments dissociate and enzymatic activity ceases, preventing unwanted tagging after the activity window of interest [9].

Figure 1: CaST Activation Mechanism. The diagram illustrates the molecular events leading to protein biotinylation, requiring both elevated calcium and exogenous biotin as simultaneous inputs.

Quantitative Characterization of CaST Performance

Optimization and Validation

The development of CaST involved systematic optimization to achieve maximal signal-to-background ratio (SBR) and specificity. Researchers tested multiple configurations of the fusion constructs, varying the spatial arrangement and subcellular localization of components [9]. Through quantitative analysis, they identified that a 5:2 transfection ratio of CD4-sTb(C)-M13-GFP to CaM-V5-sTb(N) yielded optimal performance [9] [15]. To ensure coordinated expression of both fragments in the same cells, the team developed bicistronic vectors using both P2A "self-cleaving" peptides and internal ribosome entry site (IRES) sequences [9]. The CaST-IRES construct demonstrated superior performance with a 5-fold increase in SBR compared to the non-IRES version, which showed only a 2.7-fold improvement [9]. This enhanced performance is attributed to the IRES mechanism producing more balanced expression levels of the two fragments, consistent with the optimal 5:2 ratio identified in earlier experiments.

Validation experiments confirmed the specificity of the CaST system. Control studies demonstrated that omitting either fragment of CaST resulted in complete loss of biotinylation signal, even in the presence of both biotin and elevated calcium [9]. Similarly, excluding either biotin or calcium activation individually produced minimal background signal, confirming the coincidence detection capability of the system [9]. Immunohistochemistry and confocal imaging verified co-expression of both fragments in the same cells, while western blot analysis confirmed calcium-dependent biotinylation across a diverse array of cellular proteins [9] [15].

Performance Metrics and Temporal Resolution

CaST demonstrates exceptional performance characteristics that enable precise detection of cellular activation events. The system achieves rapid tagging within 10 minutes of biotin delivery, far surpassing transcriptional reporters that require 6-18 hours to develop signal [9] [15]. Quantitative assessment using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis revealed outstanding discrimination capability, with the CaST-IRES construct achieving an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.93 for distinguishing calcium-activated versus non-activated cells [9]. This represents a significant improvement over the non-IRES version (AUC = 0.87) and confirms the system's robustness for single-cell analysis.

Table 1: Performance Metrics of CaST Constructs

Parameter	Non-IRES CaST	CaST-IRES	Measurement Method
Signal-to-Background Ratio	2.7-fold	5-fold	Fluorescence imaging (SA-647/GFP) [9]
Discrimination Accuracy (AUC)	0.87	0.93	ROC analysis [9]
Optimal Fragment Ratio	5:2	N/A (single vector)	Transfection optimization [9]
Minimum Labeling Time	10 minutes	10 minutes	Time-course experiments [9] [15]

The temporal characteristics of CaST make it particularly valuable for capturing dynamic cellular events. The system functions as a time-gated integrator of calcium activity, with signal intensity increasing proportionally with both calcium concentration and biotin labeling time [9] [15]. Crucially, the reversibility of the system was experimentally confirmed - cells exposed to calcium followed by biotin after a 10-minute wash period showed no significant biotinylation, demonstrating that only concurrent calcium elevation and biotin availability produce tagging [9]. This reversible, time-delimited activation profile enables researchers to capture specific windows of cellular activity with high temporal precision.

Research Reagent Solutions

Implementing CaST technology requires specific molecular tools and reagents that have been optimized through systematic testing. The table below details the essential components for establishing CaST in experimental systems:

Table 2: Essential Research Reagents for CaST Implementation

Reagent / Tool	Function / Role	Specifications / Notes
Split-TurboID Fragments	Catalytic component for proximity labeling	Low-affinity split at L73/G74; fragments are inactive alone [16]
Calmodulin (CaM)	Calcium-sensing domain	Undergoes conformational change upon Ca²⁺ binding [9] [15]
M13 Peptide	Calmodulin-binding domain	Binds CaM only in calcium-bound state [9] [15]
CD4 Transmembrane Domain	Membrane tethering	Localizes sTb(C)-M13 to plasma membrane [9]
IRES or P2A Sequence	Coordinated expression	Ensures both fragments expressed in same cells; IRES preferred [9]
Biotin	Enzyme substrate	Cell-permeable, crosses blood-brain barrier [9] [15]
Streptavidin-Conjugated Detection Reagents	Signal detection	e.g., SA-Alexa647 for fluorescence; SA-beads for proteomics [9]

Experimental Protocols

CaST Expression and Validation Workflow

The implementation of CaST requires careful experimental setup and validation to ensure proper function. The following protocol outlines the key steps for establishing CaST in mammalian cell systems:

Cell Culture and Transfection:

• Culture HEK293T cells (or other relevant cell type) in appropriate medium under standard conditions
• Transfect with CaST-IRES bicistronic construct using preferred transfection method
• Critical: Maintain 5:2 ratio of sTb(C) to sTb(N) components if using separate constructs [9]
• Allow 24-48 hours for protein expression before proceeding with experiments

Calcium Activation and Biotin Labeling:

• Prepare experimental groups with appropriate controls:
  • Group 1: CaST + biotin + calcium ionophore (full activation)
  • Group 2: CaST + biotin only (background control)
  • Group 3: CaST + calcium ionophore only (no biotin control)
• Add biotin to final concentration of 50-500 μM to Groups 1 and 2 [9]
• Simultaneously add calcium ionophore (e.g., ionomycin) to Groups 1 and 3 to final concentration of 1-5 μM
• Incubate for precisely 10 minutes at 37°C [9] [15]
• Terminate reaction by removing medium and washing cells with ice-cold PBS

Detection and Analysis:

• For fluorescence detection: Fix cells, permeabilize if needed, and incubate with streptavidin-Alexa647 (1:1000 dilution) [9]
• Image using standard fluorescence microscopy and quantify mean SA-647/GFP ratio per cell
• For western blot: Lyse cells, resolve proteins by SDS-PAGE, transfer to membrane, and probe with streptavidin-HRP
• For proteomic analysis: Harvest biotinylated proteins with streptavidin beads, followed by on-bead trypsin digestion and LC-MS/MS analysis [17]

Figure 2: CaST Experimental Workflow. The diagram outlines key steps from cell preparation to data analysis, highlighting multiple detection endpoints.

In Vivo Application for Neural Circuit Mapping

The CaST system enables novel approaches for mapping neural activity in behaving animals, as demonstrated in studies of psilocybin-induced neuronal activation [9]. The following protocol adapts this approach for generalizable neural circuit mapping:

Stereotactic Surgery and Viral Delivery:

• Inject AAV particles encoding CaST-IRES into target brain region (e.g., prefrontal cortex) using stereotactic coordinates
• Allow 2-4 weeks for viral expression and protein stabilization
• For controls, inject AAV encoding inactive CaST fragments or GFP only

Behavioral Paradigm and Biotin Administration:

• Habituate animals to experimental conditions and handling
• Administer biotin intraperitoneally (50-100 mg/kg) or intravenously 5-10 minutes before behavioral testing [9]
• Present stimuli or administer compounds of interest during behavioral session
• Maintain biotin availability throughout activity period (typically 10-30 minutes)

Tissue Processing and Analysis:

• Euthanize animals and perfuse with ice-cold PBS followed by 4% PFA
• Extract brains, post-fix for 2-4 hours, and cryoprotect in 30% sucrose
• Section tissue at 20-40 μm thickness using cryostat or vibratome
• Process sections for:
  • Biotin detection: Incubate with streptavidin-conjugated fluorophores
  • Immunohistochemistry: Co-stain for cell-type markers (e.g., NeuN, GFAP)
  • Imaging: Acquire using confocal or light-sheet microscopy
• Quantify activated cells by measuring biotin signal intensity and spatial distribution

Applications in Neurobiological Research

CaST technology has enabled groundbreaking investigations into neural circuit function and drug effects in the brain. A compelling demonstration of its utility comes from studies of psilocybin-induced neuronal activation in the prefrontal cortex (PFC) [9] [13]. Researchers applied CaST to tag PFC neurons activated during psilocybin administration and successfully correlated the biotinylation signal with head-twitch responses in freely behaving mice [9]. This application highlights several key advantages of CaST: ability to work in untethered animals, correlation of neural activity with specific behaviors, and rapid tagging that captures immediate drug effects rather than secondary responses.

Beyond pharmaceutical applications, CaST offers transformative potential for mapping functional neural circuits throughout the brain. The technology enables researchers to address fundamental questions about which specific neurons and circuits participate in particular behaviors, learning processes, or disease states. The biochemical nature of the biotin tag facilitates diverse downstream applications, including cell sorting for transcriptomic analysis, connectivity mapping through volume electron microscopy, and proteomic profiling of activated cell populations [9]. Unlike light-dependent tagging systems that require invasive fiber implants, CaST works non-invasively throughout the brain, making it particularly valuable for studying deep brain structures or distributed circuits.

The principles underlying CaST also establish a framework for engineering similar tools that respond to other signaling molecules beyond calcium. The modular design - coupling a sensing domain to split-TurboID - could potentially be adapted to detect cAMP, kinase activity, neurotransmitter release, or other dynamic cellular events [9]. This versatility suggests that enzyme-catalyzed tagging represents not just a single tool, but an emerging platform for recording diverse aspects of cellular activity history in vivo.

How Proximity Labeling Enzymes Like TurboID and APEX are Revolutionizing Cell Biology

Enzyme-catalyzed proximity labeling (PL) has emerged as a transformative technology for studying spatial organization and molecular interactions within living cells. By enabling the precise marking of biomolecules in specific cellular compartments or near proteins of interest, techniques utilizing engineered enzymes like TurboID and APEX are overcoming longstanding limitations of traditional methods such as affinity purification and yeast two-hybrid systems [18]. These innovative approaches allow researchers to capture dynamic cellular processes with unprecedented spatial and temporal resolution, particularly advancing research on biochemical tagging of cellular activity history in vivo. This article provides detailed application notes and experimental protocols for implementing these revolutionary technologies in biomedical research.

Proximity labeling relies on genetically encoded enzymes that generate reactive molecules to covalently tag nearby proteins and nucleic acids with biotin [19]. The two primary classes of PL enzymes—biotin ligases and peroxidases—offer complementary advantages for different experimental needs.

TurboID and miniTurbo are engineered biotin ligases developed through yeast display-based directed evolution of E. coli biotin ligase (BirA) [20]. These enzymes utilize ATP to activate biotin, forming a reactive biotin-AMP intermediate that diffuses a limited distance before covalently attaching to lysine residues on nearby proteins [19]. TurboID represents a substantial improvement over previous biotin ligases, reducing labeling times from 18-24 hours to just 10 minutes while maintaining high efficiency [20] [19]. The miniTurbo variant, while approximately 1.5-2 fold less active than TurboID, offers lower background labeling in the absence of exogenous biotin, providing superior temporal control [20].

APEX and APEX2 are engineered ascorbate peroxidases that function through a distinct mechanism [21] [22]. In the presence of hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂), these enzymes convert biotin-phenol into a short-lived phenoxyl radical that tags electron-rich amino acids (primarily tyrosine) on proximal proteins [22] [19]. APEX2, an evolved version with enhanced activity and stability, enables extremely rapid labeling within 1 minute [21] [18]. However, APEX2 requires H₂O₂, which can be toxic to cells, and biotin-phenol, which has limited membrane permeability [20] [22].

Table 1: Comparison of Major Proximity Labeling Enzymes

Enzyme	Class	Labeling Time	Key Substrates	Primary Residues Labeled	Key Advantages	Limitations
TurboID	Biotin Ligase	10 min	Biotin, ATP	Lysine, N-termini	Non-toxic, works in live animals, high efficiency	Some background labeling, cytotoxicity concerns
miniTurbo	Biotin Ligase	10 min	Biotin, ATP	Lysine, N-termini	Reduced background vs. TurboID	1.5-2x less active than TurboID
APEX2	Peroxidase	1 min	Biotin-phenol, H₂O₂	Tyrosine, Tryptophan	Ultra-fast, smallest labeling radius (~20 nm)	H₂O₂ toxicity, biotin-phenol permeability issues
BioID	Biotin Ligase	18-24 hours	Biotin, ATP	Lysine, N-termini	Well-established, minimal background	Very slow kinetics
BioID2	Biotin Ligase	>16 hours	Biotin, ATP	Lysine, N-termini	Smaller size, less biotin required	Still requires long labeling times

Table 2: Performance Comparison of Proximity Labeling Enzymes in Mammalian Cells

Enzyme	Relative Signal After 10 Min	Relative Signal After 1 Hour	Detectable Labeling in Neurons	Optimal Organelles
TurboID	~15-23x higher than BioID	N/A	Yes (ex vivo)	Mitochondrial matrix, ER lumen, nucleus
miniTurbo	~10-15x higher than BioID	N/A	Yes (ex vivo)	Cytosol, nuclear compartment
APEX2	N/A	N/A	Yes (ex vivo, fixed tissue)	Membrane compartments, cytosol, nucleus
BioID	Minimal	Dimly detectable in small fraction of cells	Limited	Varies by context

Research Reagent Solutions for Proximity Labeling

Table 3: Essential Research Reagents for Proximity Labeling Experiments

Reagent	Function	Example Application	Considerations
Biotin	Substrate for biotin ligases (TurboID/miniTurbo)	Live-cell labeling in culture and in vivo	Membrane-permeable, low toxicity; 50-500 μM typical concentration [20]
Biotin-Phenol (BP)	Substrate for APEX2	Ultra-fast compartment-specific labeling	Limited membrane permeability; typically 500 μM [21]
Hydrogen Peroxide (H₂O₂)	Activator for APEX2	Induces BP oxidation for radical formation	Cytotoxic; optimal concentration ~0.03% for 1 minute [21]
Streptavidin Beads	Affinity purification	Enrichment of biotinylated proteins	High binding capacity essential for proteomic coverage
Quencher Solution	Stops labeling reaction	Termination of APEX2 labeling	Typically contains Trolox, sodium ascorbate, and sodium azide
Tyramide Signal Amplification (TSA)	Signal enhancement	Boosting detection of low-abundance targets	Useful for initial validation of low-activity systems

Experimental Protocols for Proximity Labeling

Protocol 1: TurboID-Based Proximity Labeling in Mammalian Cells

This protocol outlines the procedure for identifying proteins proximal to a target of interest in living mammalian cells using TurboID, adapted from Branon et al. [20].

Reagents and Solutions:

• Complete cell culture medium
• Biotin stock solution (500 mM in DMSO)
• Phosphate-buffered saline (PBS)
• Lysis buffer: RIPA buffer supplemented with protease inhibitors
• Streptavidin-coated magnetic beads

Procedure:

• Genetic Construct Design: Fuse TurboID to your protein of interest using standard molecular biology techniques. Include a flexible linker (e.g., 15-20 amino acids) between the protein and TurboID to minimize steric interference.

• Cell Transfection and Expression: Transfect constructs into HEK293T cells (or your preferred cell line) using standard methods. Allow 24-48 hours for protein expression.

• Biotin Labeling: Add biotin to culture medium at a final concentration of 50-500 μM. Incubate for 10 minutes at 37°C for most applications. Note: The optimal concentration and time may require empirical determination for specific targets.

• Reaction Termination and Cell Lysis:

  • Remove biotin-containing medium
  • Wash cells quickly 2-3 times with ice-cold PBS
  • Lyse cells in RIPA buffer with protease inhibitors
  • Clarify lysates by centrifugation at 14,000 × g for 15 minutes

• Affinity Purification:

  • Incubate clarified lysate with streptavidin-coated magnetic beads for 1-2 hours at 4°C with gentle rotation
  • Wash beads stringently with successive buffers:
    • Wash 1: RIPA buffer
    • Wash 2: 1 M KCl
    • Wash 3: 0.1 M Na₂CO₃
    • Wash 4: 2 M urea in 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0)
    • Final wash: RIPA buffer

• On-Bead Digestion and Proteomic Analysis:

  • Digest proteins on beads using trypsin
  • Desalt peptides and analyze by LC-MS/MS
  • Process mass spectrometry data using standard bioinformatic pipelines

Protocol 2: APEX2-Based Cell-Type Specific Subcellular Proteomics in Brain Tissue

This protocol describes an ex vivo approach for mapping compartment-specific proteomes in distinct neuronal populations in the mouse brain, based on the method by Sokol et al. [21].

Reagents and Solutions:

• Artificial cerebrospinal fluid (ACSF), carbogenated (95% O₂/5% CO₂)
• Biotin-phenol stock solution (500 mM in DMSO)
• Hydrogen peroxide (0.03% in ACSF)
• Quenching solution: 10 mM sodium ascorbate, 5 mM Trolox, and 10 mM sodium azide in PBS
• Streptavidin magnetic beads

Procedure:

• Genetic Targeting:
  • Design Cre-dependent AAV vectors encoding H2B-APEX2 (nuclear), NES-APEX2 (cytosolic), or LCK-APEX2 (membrane) based on research goals
  • Inject AAVs into specific Cre-driver mouse lines for cell-type restricted expression
  • Allow 5-6 weeks for viral expression and protein localization

• Acute Brain Slice Preparation:

  • Prepare 250 μm acute brain slices in ice-cold, carbogenated ACSF using a vibratome
  • Transfer slices to recovery chamber with carbogenated ACSF at 32°C for 30 minutes

• Ex Vivo Biotinylation:

  • Incubate slices in carbogenated ACSF supplemented with 500 μM biotin-phenol for 1 hour
  • Transfer slices to ACSF containing 0.03% H₂O₂ for exactly 1 minute
  • Immediately quench reaction by transferring slices to quenching solution

• Tissue Dissection and Protein Extraction:

  • Dissect EGFP-positive regions under a fluorescence microscope
  • Homogenize tissue in RIPA lysis buffer with protease inhibitors
  • Sonicate samples briefly and clarify by centrifugation

• Proteomic Sample Preparation:

  • Enrich biotinylated proteins with streptavidin beads
  • Perform on-bead digestion with trypsin
  • Label peptides with TMT isobaric tags for multiplexed quantitative proteomics
  • Analyze by LC-MS/MS

Advanced Applications: Recording Cellular Activity History

The exceptional temporal resolution of modern proximity labeling enzymes enables innovative applications in recording cellular activity history in vivo. The recently developed Ca²⁺-activated split-TurboID (CaST) system represents a breakthrough in biochemical tagging of activated cells [5].

CaST System Design and Mechanism: CaST ingeniously repurposes split-TurboID as a coincidence detector for elevated intracellular Ca²⁺ and exogenous biotin delivery [5]. The system consists of two fragments:

• CD4-sTb(C)-M13-GFP (membrane-tethered)
• CaM-V5-sTb(N) (cytosolic)

Under elevated Ca²⁺ conditions, calmodulin (CaM) binds to the M13 peptide, reconstituting split-TurboID and enabling biotinylation of nearby proteins only when both biotin and high Ca²⁺ are present simultaneously [5].

Protocol 3: CaST-Based Neuronal Activity Recording in vivo

This protocol outlines the procedure for tagging activated neurons in behaving mice using the CaST system [5].

Reagents:

• CaST-IRES bicistronic vector
• Biotin (sterile, for intraperitoneal injection)
• Appropriate viral packaging system (AAV preferred)

Procedure:

• Viral Preparation:
  • Package CaST-IRES construct into appropriate AAV serotype (e.g., AAV9 for neuronal expression)
  • Purify and titer virus using standard methods

• Stereotaxic Surgery:

  • Inject AAV-CaST-IRES into target brain region (e.g., prefrontal cortex)
  • Allow 3-4 weeks for robust expression

• Activity Labeling:

  • Administer biotin intraperitoneally (dose optimized for blood-brain barrier penetration) [5]
  • Present stimuli or administer compounds during desired time window
  • CaST labels activated neurons within 10 minutes of biotin delivery

• Tissue Processing and Analysis:

  • Perfuse and fix brain tissue
  • Process for streptavidin staining to identify biotinylated cells
  • Combine with immunohistochemistry or in situ hybridization for multimodal analysis

Proximity labeling enzymes like TurboID and APEX represent a paradigm shift in how researchers study cellular organization and record activity history in living systems. The protocols outlined herein provide practical frameworks for implementing these technologies across various experimental contexts, from basic cell culture to complex in vivo models. As these tools continue to evolve, they will undoubtedly uncover new dimensions of cellular organization and function, particularly in the context of neurological diseases and drug development where understanding spatiotemporal protein dynamics is crucial. The ability to capture snapshots of cellular proteomes with high spatial and temporal resolution makes proximity labeling an indispensable technology in modern cell biology and neuroscience research.

A central challenge in modern biology, particularly in neuroscience and drug development, is the ability to record transient cellular activity within living organisms and link this history to molecular identity and function. The ideal tool would capture the activity of specific cell types during brief behavioral events or pharmacological interventions with high temporal resolution and minimal invasiveness. For years, research relied on immediate early gene (IEG)-based systems (e.g., TRAP, TetTag), which, while powerful, have temporal windows of several hours, limiting their resolution for short-lived events [23].

The field has since diverged into two innovative approaches to overcome these limitations. The first involves light-gated transcriptional reporters like FLiCRE and Cal-Light, which use calcium and light as coincidence detectors to drive transgene expression [24] [25]. The second is a newer class of rapid enzymatic tagging systems, exemplified by Ca2+-activated split-TurboID (CaST), which biochemically labels activated cells within minutes by covalently attaching a biotin tag to nearby proteins [5]. This Application Note provides a comparative overview of these technologies, detailing their mechanisms, protocols, and applications to guide researchers in selecting the optimal tool for probing cellular activity history in vivo.

Technology Mechanisms and Signaling Pathways

Transcriptional Reporters: FLiCRE and Cal-Light

Transcriptional reporters convert a transient physiological signal into stable, heritable gene expression, enabling long-term access to the recorded cell population.

FLiCRE (Fast Light and Calcium-Regulated Expression) functions as a molecular integrator. A transcription factor is tethered to the plasma membrane. In the presence of both blue light and high intracellular calcium, a calcium-sensing calmodulin domain brings a protease (uTEVp) near its cleavage site on the membrane-tethered factor. Concurrently, light activates a photosensory LOV domain, uncaging the cleavage site. The protease is then able to cleave and release the transcription factor, which translocates to the nucleus to drive the expression of a transgene (e.g., a fluorescent protein, opsin, or Cre recombinase) [24] [25]. This AND-gate logic ensures high specificity.

Cal-Light operates on a similar principle of calcium and light coincidence detection but employs a distinct molecular mechanism centered on calcium-dependent recruitment of a light-sensitive cryptochrome 2 (CRY2) protein. In this system, elevated calcium leads to calmodulin binding, which recruits a CRY2-tagged transcription factor fragment to the membrane. Blue light then induces the dimerization of this CRY2 fragment with a membrane-anchored CIB1 protein, facilitating the reconstitution of a split transcription factor which then drives reporter gene expression [5] [23].

Rapid Enzymatic Tagging: Ca2+-activated split-TurboID (CaST)

In contrast to transcription-based methods, CaST bypasses the central dogma to directly label the proteome of active cells. The system is built from a split-TurboID enzyme, where one fragment is fused to calmodulin (CaM) and the other to an M13 peptide. During high intracellular calcium, CaM binds to M13, leading to the reconstitution of an active TurboID enzyme. This functional enzyme then uses exogenously delivered biotin to covalently tag nearby endogenous proteins with biotin. The biotinylation signal is immediate and permanent, serving as a biochemical record of activity [5].

Table 1: Core Mechanism and Output Comparison

Feature	Transcriptional Reporters (FLiCRE)	Rapid Enzymatic Tagging (CaST)
Primary Trigger	Intracellular Ca²⁺ & Blue Light [24] [25]	Intracellular Ca²⁺ [5]
Core Mechanism	Proteolytic release of a membrane-tethered transcription factor [25]	Calcium-dependent reconstitution of split-TurboID [5]
Primary Output	Expression of a transgene (e.g., fluorescent protein, opsin, Cre) [24]	Covalent biotinylation of endogenous proteins [5]
Co-factor Requirement	Exogenous biotin not required for transcription	Requires exogenous biotin delivery [5]
Logical Operation	AND-gate (Ca²⁺ AND Light) [25]	Primarily an ON-gate (Ca²⁺), timed by biotin delivery [5]

Detailed Experimental Protocols

Protocol for FLiCRE-Mediated Neural Ensemble Tagging

This protocol details the use of FLiCRE for labeling neurons activated by aversive stimuli in the mouse nucleus accumbens (NAc) [24] [25].

Research Reagent Solutions & Essential Materials

• FLiCRE Plasmid System: AAV vectors expressing the membrane-tethered FLiCRE component (e.g., under a synapsin promoter) and the UAS-driven transgene of interest (e.g., mCherry, ChR2).
• uTEVp-Calmodulin Construct: AAV vector for cytosolic expression of the calcium-sensing protease.
• Optogenetic Hardware: Laser or LED system for delivering 470 nm blue light via an implanted optical fiber.
• Stereotaxic Apparatus: For precise intracranial virus injection and fiber implantation.
• Immunohistochemistry Reagents: Antibodies for detecting the expressed transgene (e.g., anti-mCherry).

Step-by-Step Workflow

• Stereotaxic Surgery: Inject AAVs encoding the FLiCRE system and UAS-reporter into the NAc of mice. Implant an optical fiber above the injection site.
• Recovery and Expression: Allow 3-6 weeks for robust viral expression.
• Behavioral Tagging Session: Place the mouse in a behavioral arena. During the presentation of an aversive stimulus (e.g., a footshock), deliver 1-5 minutes of pulsed or continuous blue light (e.g., 10-20 Hz pulses, 10 ms pulse width) through the implanted fiber to activate FLiCRE.
• Tissue Processing: After a 24-48 hour survival period to allow for transgene expression, perfuse the mouse and harvest the brain.
• Analysis: Section the brain and image using fluorescence microscopy to identify mCherry-positive tagged neurons. For functional manipulation, repeat stimulation in mice expressing a UAS-channelrhodopsin to validate the causal role of tagged ensembles in behavior [25].

Protocol for CaST-Based Tagging of Pharmacologically Activated Neurons

This protocol describes using CaST to label prefrontal cortex neurons activated by psilocybin in freely behaving mice [5].

Research Reagent Solutions & Essential Materials

• CaST AAVs: A bi-cistronic AAV vector (CaST-IRES) ensuring coordinated expression of both CD4-sTb(C)-M13-GFP and CaM-V5-sTb(N) fragments.
• Biotin Solution: Sterilized biotin prepared in PBS for systemic injection (e.g., 50-100 mg/kg).
• Pharmacological Agent: Psilocybin or other compound of interest.
• Fixation and Staining Reagents: Paraformaldehyde (PFA), streptavidin conjugated to a fluorophore (e.g., SA-647), and blocking serum.

Step-by-Step Workflow

• Viral Delivery: Inject the CaST-IRES AAV into the prefrontal cortex of mice using stereotaxic surgery.
• Recovery and Expression: Allow 3-6 weeks for viral expression.
• Activity-Dependent Labeling:
  • Administer psilocybin (or vehicle control) intraperitoneally to the mouse.
  • Within the desired 10-minute activity window, inject biotin intraperitoneally.
• Perfusion and Tissue Harvest: Approximately 10-30 minutes after biotin injection, perfuse the mouse transcardially with PFA. Extract and post-fix the brain.
• Streptavidin Staining and Imaging: Section the brain, incubate with fluorescently conjugated streptavidin, and image. The biotin signal marks cells that were active during the biotin injection window.

Comparative Performance and Application Data

The choice between transcriptional and enzymatic tagging is dictated by the experimental needs for temporal resolution, multiplexing, and downstream analysis.

Table 2: Quantitative Performance and Application Metrics

Parameter	Transcriptional Reporters (FLiCRE)	Rapid Enzymatic Tagging (CaST)	Traditional IEG (TRAP2)
Temporal Resolution (Tagging Window)	~1-5 minutes [25]	~10 minutes [5]	~6-12 hours [23]
Time to Signal Detection	~6-24 hours (for protein expression) [24] [25]	Immediate (post-biotinylation) [5]	~6-18 hours [5] [23]
Light Requirement	Required (for temporal gating) [25]	Not Required [5]	Not Required [23]
Primary Readout Modalities	Fluorescence imaging, scRNA-seq, optogenetics [24] [25]	Streptavidin staining, protein enrichment, Western blot [5]	Fluorescence imaging, scRNA-seq [23]
Ideal Application	Linking cell-type to behavior with causal manipulation; deep molecular profiling [24]	High-throughput screening of drug effects; rapid kinetics in freely behaving animals [5]	Long-duration events; whole-brain mapping of activated ensembles [23]

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Research Reagents

Table 3: Key Research Reagent Solutions for Biochemical Tagging

Reagent / Solution	Function	Example Use Case
Split-Enzyme Systems	Core engine for activity sensing; split-TurboID for CaST, split-TEV for FLiCRE.	Reconstitutes upon calcium influx to produce an output (biotinylation or cleavage) [5] [25].
Calcium-Sensing Domains	Detect changes in intracellular calcium, the universal proxy for cellular activation.	Calmodulin (CaM) and M13 peptide used in both FLiCRE and CaST [5] [25].
Exogenous Cofactor (Biotin)	Small, cell-permeable molecule that serves as the tag for enzymatic labeling.	Delivered in vivo to be used by reconstituted TurboID in active cells [5].
AAV Delivery Vectors	Safe and efficient vehicles for stable gene delivery into specific cell types in vivo.	Used to express all genetic components of FLiCRE and CaST in target brain regions [24] [5].
Streptavidin Conjugates	High-affinity detection tool for the biotin tag deposited by CaST.	Fluorescent streptavidin for imaging; bead-conjugated streptavidin for protein/cell enrichment [5].
Photosensory Domains (e.g., LOV, CRY2)	Provide light-dependent control for precise temporal gating.	The LOV domain in FLiCRE cages the TEVcs, preventing cleavage in the dark [25].

The development of FLiCRE/Cal-Light and CaST represents a significant leap forward from IEG-based methods, offering researchers powerful tools to dissect the functional architecture of cellular networks. The critical distinction lies in their speed and the nature of their output.

Transcriptional reporters (FLiCRE) are unparalleled when the experimental goal is long-term genetic access to activated populations for deep molecular profiling or causal functional manipulation. The ability to express optogenetic tools or record the ensemble's transcriptome via scRNA-seq is a transformative capability [24] [25]. However, this power comes at the cost of slower signal onset and the requirement for invasive light delivery, which can complicate experiments in freely behaving animals or deep tissues.

Rapid enzymatic tagging (CaST) offers a paradigm shift in speed and simplicity. Its ability to generate a detectable signal within minutes of the initiating event and its independence from light make it ideal for pharmacological screens and correlating neural activity with spontaneous behaviors in untethered animals [5]. The main limitation is that the output is a protein tag, not a transgene, which restricts downstream manipulation.

In conclusion, the selection between these technologies is not a matter of which is superior, but which is optimal for the specific biological question. For causal, cell-type-specific interrogation of circuits defined by activity, FLiCRE remains the tool of choice. For high-throughput, rapid kinetic studies of cellular activation in their most natural and unperturbed state, CaST provides a groundbreaking new option. Together, they provide a versatile toolkit for writing the history of cellular activity directly into the biomolecular fabric of the cell.

A Practical Guide to Biochemical Tagging Methods and Their Research Applications

The Ca²⁺-activated Split-TurboID (CaST) tool represents a significant methodological advancement in the field of cellular activity history tagging, enabling researchers to capture neuronal activation in vivo with unprecedented temporal resolution. Developed by researchers at the University of California, Davis, this protein-based, non-invasive tool addresses a critical limitation in neuroscience: the need to rapidly and precisely identify neurons activated by specific stimuli, including psychoactive compounds such as psilocybin [26] [27]. The tool operates on a fundamental principle of neuronal biology—the rapid influx of calcium ions (Ca²⁺) that occurs during neuronal activation—and leverages this universal signaling mechanism to biochemically tag active cells [27]. For researchers investigating the cellular mechanisms of psychedelics, CaST provides a powerful means to link drug exposure to specific neuronal activation patterns and subsequent neuroplastic events, thereby offering insights into the therapeutic potential of these compounds for disorders such as depression, post-traumatic stress disorder, and substance use disorder [26] [28].

Mechanism of Action: A Biochemical Perspective

The CaST tool is an ingeniously engineered system that translates the transient, electrical event of neuronal firing into a stable, biochemical tag suitable for post-hoc analysis. The mechanism can be broken down into a series of discrete, sequential steps:

• Calcium Sensing: The core component of CaST is a re-engineered version of the proximity-labeling enzyme split-TurboID. This enzyme is split into two inactive fragments that remain dormant within the neuron until a activation signal is received [27]. The key innovation is that the reconstitution and activation of this enzyme are made dependent on intracellular calcium concentration. When a neuron is activated by a stimulus such as psilocybin, voltage-gated calcium channels open, leading to a rapid increase in intracellular Ca²⁺ levels. This Ca²⁺ surge serves as the primary trigger for the CaST system [26] [27].

• Enzyme Activation: The elevated Ca²⁺ binds to calmodulin (CaM), a ubiquitous calcium-sensing protein. The Ca²⁺/calmodulin complex then facilitates the reassembly of the two split-TurboID fragments, restoring the enzyme's catalytic activity. This design makes the tagging process a direct, real-time reporter of intracellular calcium flux [27].

• Biotinylation: Once activated, the reconstituted TurboID enzyme uses an exogenously delivered molecule of biotin (vitamin B7) as a substrate. The enzyme catalyzes the transfer of a biotinoyl group onto lysine residues of proximate proteins within the activated neuron. Biotin acts as a "biochemical handle" or tag that is covalently and stably attached to the neuronal proteome [26] [27]. The use of biotin is particularly strategic due to the wide availability of highly specific and sensitive detection tools, such as streptavidin-conjugated fluorophores and antibodies, which allow for easy visualization and purification of tagged cells and proteins [26] [28].

• Signal Integration: A critical feature of CaST is its function as a "time-gated integrator of total Ca²⁺ activity" [27]. Unlike fluorescent sensors that provide a momentary snapshot, the enzymatic nature of CaST allows it to accumulate biotin tags over a user-defined window of time—as short as 10 to 30 minutes—providing a cumulative record of neuronal activity during that period [26] [27].

Table 1: Key Characteristics of the CaST Tagging Mechanism

Feature	Description	Functional Significance
Trigger Signal	Increase in intracellular Ca²⁺	Taps into a universal marker of neuronal activation [27].
Activation Mechanism	Ca²⁺/Calmodulin-dependent reassembly of split-TurboID	Provides high specificity for activated cells; low background noise.
Tagging Molecule	Biotin	Creates a stable, covalent tag; compatible with numerous commercial detection and purification tools [26] [28].
Temporal Resolution	10 - 30 minutes	Rapid tagging allows correlation with specific stimuli or behaviors; far faster than transcription-based reporters [26] [27].
Readout Modality	Histological staining, protein analysis	Enables both spatial mapping of active cells and proteomic profiling of their contents [26].

The following diagram illustrates the sequential biochemical mechanism of the CaST tool within a neuron:

Experimental Protocol for Psilocybin-Activated Neuron Tagging

This section provides a detailed, step-by-step protocol for employing the CaST tool to tag and identify neurons activated by psilocybin in a freely behaving mouse model. The procedure can be broadly divided into three phases: Viral Vector Preparation, In Vivo Delivery and Incubation, and Stimulation, Tagging, and Analysis [26] [27].

The experimental workflow, from tool delivery to data analysis, is summarized in the following diagram:

Detailed Step-by-Step Procedures

Phase 1: Viral Vector Preparation and Delivery

• Tool Packaging: The DNA encoding the CaST construct is packaged into harmless adeno-associated viruses (AAVs) to enable efficient delivery into neurons [26] [28]. These viruses serve as vehicles to introduce the genetic instructions for the CaST tool into the target cells.
• Stereotactic Surgery and Injection: Anesthetize the experimental subject (e.g., a mouse) and secure it in a stereotactic frame. Using aseptic technique, perform a craniotomy and inject the AAV-containing CaST construct into the target brain region—for psilocybin studies, this is typically the prefrontal cortex (PFC), a area known to be affected by psychedelics and implicated in several brain disorders [26] [29]. Control animals should be injected with a control virus.
• Post-Op Recovery and Incubation: Allow the animal to recover for several weeks (typically 2-4 weeks) to ensure robust expression of the CaST proteins within the neurons of the PFC [26]. During this period, the viral vector transduces the cells, and the encoded proteins are expressed and remain dormant.

Phase 2: Stimulation and Biochemical Tagging

• Psilocybin Administration: Administer a defined dose of psilocybin to the freely behaving mouse. The dose should be selected based on the research question (e.g., 25 mg/kg is a common high dose in rodent studies) [30]. A control group should receive a vehicle injection.
• Behavioral Correlate Monitoring: Concurrently with drug administration, monitor and quantify the head-twitch response (HTR). The HTR is the primary behavioral correlate of the hallucinogenic effects of psychedelics in rodents and serves as a valuable in vivo readout of drug efficacy [26] [28].
• Biotin Delivery and Tagging Window: Immediately following psilocybin administration, deliver biotin systemically (e.g., via intraperitoneal injection). The biotin must be available in the brain during the period of peak neuronal activation. The CaST tool will be active and tag proteins in neurons with elevated calcium for a defined window of 10 to 30 minutes [26] [27].

Phase 3: Tissue Processing and Analysis

• Perfusion and Tissue Collection: At the end of the tagging window, deeply anesthetize the animal and transcardially perfuse it with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) followed by 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) to fix the brain tissue. Extract the brain and post-fix it in PFA, then transfer it to a sucrose solution for cryoprotection. Section the brain into coronal slices (e.g., 40 µm thickness) using a cryostat or vibratome.
• Detection of Biotin Tagging:
  • Immunohistochemistry: Incubate free-floating brain sections with a streptavidin-conjugated fluorophore (e.g., Streptavidin-Alexa Fluor 488) to visually detect the biotinylated cells.
  • Imaging: Image the stained sections using a fluorescence or confocal microscope. The resulting images will reveal a "camera snapshot" of the specific neurons in the PFC that were activated by psilocybin [26] [28].
• Downstream Proteomic Analysis (Optional): For proteomic analysis, fresh (unfixed) brain tissue from the PFC is homogenized. The biotin-tagged proteins and their binding partners are isolated using streptavidin-conjugated beads. After washing, the captured proteins are eluted and identified via mass spectrometry at a core facility (e.g., UC Davis Proteomics Core) to obtain an unbiased picture of the proteomic landscape of psilocybin-activated neurons [26].

Table 2: Key Experimental Parameters for CaST-based Psilocybin Studies

Parameter	Typical Specification	Notes and Rationale
Viral Vector	Adeno-associated virus (AAV)	Consider serotype for neuronal tropism [26].
Incubation Period	2 - 4 weeks	Allows for sufficient tool expression [26].
Psilocybin Dose	Model-dependent (e.g., 25 mg/kg)	Dose should elicit target behavioral/neural response [30].
Biotin Administration	Systemic (e.g., I.P. injection)	Ensure timely delivery relative to stimulus [27].
Tagging Window	10 - 30 minutes	Defines the period of activity history captured [26] [27].
Primary Readout	Streptavidin-based fluorescence	Quantify signal intensity and cell counting [26].
Behavioral Correlate	Head-Twitch Response (HTR)	Correlate neural tagging with behavioral output [26] [28].

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Research Reagents

Successful execution of the CaST protocol requires a specific set of high-quality reagents and materials. The following table details the essential components of the "Researcher's Toolkit" for this methodology.

Table 3: Essential Research Reagents and Materials for CaST

Reagent / Material	Function / Role in Protocol	Specific Example / Note
CaST DNA Plasmid	Genetic blueprint for the Ca²⁺-activated split-TurboID enzyme.	Must be cloned into an AAV expression cassette with a neuronal promoter [26].
Adeno-Associated Virus (AAV)	Safe and efficient delivery vector for transducing neurons in vivo.	Serotypes like AAV9 are often chosen for their neuronal tropism [26] [28].
Psilocybin	The serotonergic psychedelic stimulus used to activate target neurons.	Must be obtained under appropriate DEA license for research; purity is critical [30].
Biotin	The small molecule substrate that is enzymatically attached to proteins in active cells.	High-purity, cell-permeable biotin is required for efficient in vivo tagging [27].
Streptavidin Conjugates	Detection agents that bind with high affinity and specificity to biotin.	Streptavidin conjugated to fluorophores (e.g., Alexa Fluor 488) for imaging; conjugated to beads for proteomics [26].
Precision Stereotactic Apparatus	Enables accurate delivery of the viral vector to specific brain regions.	Critical for targeting defined areas like the prefrontal cortex [26].

Quantitative Data and Experimental Outcomes

Application of the CaST tool in psilocybin research yields quantifiable data on neuronal activation. The following table summarizes key quantitative findings from proof-of-concept experiments.

Table 4: Quantitative Outcomes from CaST-based Psilocybin Experiments

Measurement	Result / Observation	Interpretation / Significance
Tagging Speed	10 - 30 minutes [26] [27]	Significantly faster than traditional transcriptional reporters (which require hours), enabling correlation with acute drug effects.
Behavioral Correlation	CaST signal correlated with psilocybin-induced head-twitch response [28]	Provides a direct link between the population of tagged neurons and the behavioral manifestation of the drug.
Spatial Resolution	Identification of activated neurons within the prefrontal cortex [26]	Confirms the PFC as a key site of action for psilocybin, consistent with its role in mood and cognition.
Proteomic Capability	Enables identification of proteins from activated cells via mass spectrometry [26]	Opens the door to unbiased discovery of molecular pathways engaged by psilocybin, beyond mere cellular identification.

Concluding Remarks

The CaST tool provides a robust and rapid method for biochemically tagging the history of neuronal activity in vivo, offering a powerful lens through which to view the cellular effects of psilocybin. Its ability to operate in freely behaving animals and provide a snapshot of activation within minutes makes it uniquely suited for psychedelics research. The detailed protocol outlined herein provides a roadmap for scientists to apply this cutting-edge technology, facilitating a deeper understanding of the neural circuits and molecular mechanisms that underlie the therapeutic potential of psychedelic compounds. Future directions for this technology include achieving brain-wide cellular labeling and further refining the proteomic analysis of activated cells to fully elucidate the step-by-step cellular process responsible for the beneficial effects of psilocybin and related neurotherapeutic agents [26] [28].

The quest to visualize and manipulate protein function within the living cell represents a cornerstone of modern biological research. While fluorescent proteins have revolutionized cell biology, they present inherent limitations, including suboptimal photophysical properties and an inability to be relabeled temporally. Self-labeling protein tags, including HaloTag, SNAP-tag, and CLIP-tag, have emerged as powerful tools that overcome these constraints. These engineered systems enable the specific, covalent labeling of protein fusions with synthetic probes, providing unprecedented flexibility for imaging and functional studies. Within the context of tracking cellular activity history, these technologies offer unique capabilities for temporal pulse-chase experiments, multi-color imaging, and high-resolution tracking of protein dynamics in vivo. This application note details the quantitative characteristics, experimental protocols, and implementation frameworks for leveraging these tools to dissect proteome dynamics with high spatial and temporal precision.

Self-labeling protein tags are engineered enzymes that form a specific, covalent bond with a small molecule probe. The protein tag is genetically fused to a protein of interest (POI), and subsequent incubation with a modified substrate (e.g., a fluorescent dye conjugated to the specific ligand) results in a stably labeled protein [31]. This approach decouples the genetic encoding of the tag from the choice of final label, offering significant advantages over traditional fluorescent proteins.

Comparative Analysis of Tag Systems

The table below summarizes the core characteristics of the three primary self-labeling tags.

Table 1: Key Characteristics of Self-Labeling Protein Tags

Property	HaloTag	SNAP-tag	CLIP-tag
Origin	Bacterial haloalkane dehalogenase [32]	Human O6-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase (hAGT) [32] [33]	Engineered variant of SNAP-tag [34] [33]
Size	297 amino acids; ~33 kDa [32] [34]	182 amino acids; ~19.4 kDa [32] [34]	182 amino acids; ~19.4 kDa [34]
Ligand	Chloroalkane (CA) [32]	O6-benzylguanine (BG) [32]	O2-benzylcytosine (BC) [34]
Labeling Kinetics	~2.7 × 10⁶ M⁻¹s⁻¹ [32]	~2.8 × 10⁴ M⁻¹s⁻¹ (with BG) [32]	Specific kinetics not detailed in results
Key Feature	Fast kinetics; high brightness with far-red dyes [35]	Well-characterized; compatible with numerous commercial probes [33]	Orthogonal substrate specificity to SNAP-tag for dual-color imaging [34]

A critical advancement is the recent development of SNAP-tag2, an engineered mutant with 11 amino acid substitutions and an 18-residue truncation. SNAP-tag2 demonstrates a ~100-fold improvement in labeling kinetics with novel trifluoromethyl pyrimidine-based substrates, approaching the diffusion-limited rates of HaloTag. Furthermore, it exhibits a fivefold increase in fluorescence brightness when labeled with fluorogenic rhodamines, significantly enhancing its performance for live-cell super-resolution imaging [36].

Essential Research Reagent Solutions

The successful application of these technologies relies on a suite of core reagents.

Table 2: Essential Research Reagents for Self-Labeling Tag Experiments

Reagent / Solution	Function & Application	Examples & Notes
Expression Vectors	Plasmid backbones for generating N- or C-terminal fusions of the tag to the POI.	Commercially available from Promega (HaloTag) and New England Biolabs (SNAP/CLIP-tag) for various host systems [31].
Fluorescent Ligands	Small molecule dyes conjugated to the tag-specific ligand (CA, BG, BC) for imaging.	Cell-permeable (e.g., TMR, SiR, Janelia Fluor dyes) and cell-impermeable (e.g., Alexa Fluor dyes) variants available for specific labeling of intracellular or surface proteins [34] [37].
Affinity Ligands	Non-fluorescent ligands for protein purification or immobilization.	Biotinylated ligands for pull-downs [34]; HaloTag can also function as a solubility tag in purification [32].
Live-Cell Imaging Media	Buffered, phenol-free media for maintaining cell health during time-lapse imaging.	-
Fixation & Permeabilization Reagents	For post-labeling cell fixation and immunostaining, if required.	Tags retain activity after fixation, allowing for combination with antibody-based methods [33].

Experimental Protocols for Multi-Color Imaging and Protein Tracking

Protocol 1: Live-Cell Multi-Color Imaging with Orthogonal Tags

This protocol enables the simultaneous visualization of two different proteins in live cells using SNAP-tag and CLIP-tag, or a combination with HaloTag [34] [33].

• Construct Generation: Clone your two proteins of interest (POI-A and POI-B) into vectors for expression as fusions with SNAP-tag and CLIP-tag (or HaloTag), respectively. Consider subcellular localization and potential functional disruption when choosing the fusion orientation (N- or C-terminal).

• Cell Transfection & Expression: Transfect the constructs into your chosen cell line (e.g., COS-7, HeLa). Allow 24-48 hours for adequate expression of the fusion proteins.

• Dye Labeling:

  • Prepare a labeling medium by diluting the cell-permeable SNAP-tag substrate (e.g., SNAP-Cell 505-BG, 1-5 µM) and CLIP-tag substrate (e.g., CLIP-Cell TMR-BC, 1-5 µM) in pre-warmed, serum-free culture medium [34].
  • Replace the cell culture medium with the dye-containing medium.
  • Incubate for 30 minutes at 37°C/5% CO₂.
  • Remove the labeling medium and wash the cells thoroughly (3x 5 minutes) with fresh, pre-warmed culture medium to remove unbound dye.

• Image Acquisition: Image the cells using a confocal or super-resolution microscope. For the dye pair above, use 488 nm excitation/525 nm emission for SNAP-tag and 561 nm excitation/585 nm emission for CLIP-tag. For STED nanoscopy, ensure the dye pairs are compatible with the available depletion lasers [35].

Figure 1: Multi-color live-cell imaging workflow using orthogonal self-labeling tags.

Protocol 2: Protein Tracking and Turnover via Pulse-Chase Labeling

This methodology leverages the temporal control of labeling to track the fate of newly synthesized proteins over time, ideal for studying protein turnover, trafficking, and stability [32] [33].

• Construct Expression: Express your POI fused to HaloTag or SNAP-tag in cells.

• Pulse Labeling ("Pulse"):

  • Incubate cells with a cell-permeable ligand conjugated to Fluorophore A (e.g., Janelia Fluor 549, 1-5 µM) for 15-30 minutes.
  • Wash extensively (3x 10 minutes) to ensure complete removal of the unbound "pulse" dye.

• Chase Period: Return the cells to normal culture conditions and incubate for the desired "chase" period (e.g., 2, 8, 24 hours). During this time, the pre-labeled protein population ages, and new, unlabeled protein is synthesized.

• Chase Labeling ("Chase"):

  • After the chase period, incubate the cells with a second, spectrally distinct, cell-permeable ligand conjugated to Fluorophore B (e.g., Janelia Fluor 646, 1-5 µM).
  • Wash thoroughly to remove unbound "chase" dye.

• Imaging and Analysis: Image the cells. The signal from Fluorophore A represents the original protein population synthesized during the pulse, while Fluorophore B identifies all protein present at the time of the chase, including the new synthesis. The ratio or spatial separation of the signals reveals protein turnover and trafficking dynamics [33].

Figure 2: Pulse-chase labeling workflow for tracking protein turnover and dynamics.

Protocol 3: Single-Molecule Tracking of Membrane Receptors

This protocol is optimized for studying the diffusion and interactions of membrane proteins at the single-molecule level [37].

• Sparse Labeling:

  • Express your membrane receptor of interest as a SNAP-tag or HaloTag fusion.
  • Incubate cells with a very low concentration (0.1-5 nM) of a photostable, cell-impermeable dye ligand (e.g., CF640R, Dy549) for 5-10 minutes at a reduced temperature (e.g., 16-20°C) to slow labeling kinetics and ensure sparse labeling of a small fraction of the total protein pool [37].

• Wash and Imaging:

  • Quickly wash the cells with ice-cold buffer to stop the labeling reaction and remove unbound dye.
  • Transfer to an imaging chamber with appropriate live-cell buffer.

• Data Acquisition:

  • Use a highly inclined and laminated optical sheet (HILO) or total internal reflection fluorescence (TIRF) microscope for high-signal-to-noise ratio imaging.
  • Acquire movies at a high frame rate (e.g., 10-100 Hz) with low excitation power to minimize photobleaching while tracking individual molecules.

• Trajectory and Analysis:

  • Use single-particle tracking software (e.g., TrackMate, u-track) to reconstruct the trajectories of individual molecules from the movie sequences.
  • Analyze trajectories to calculate diffusion coefficients, classify diffusion modes (confined, Brownian, directed), and map spatial organization.

Critical Considerations for Experimental Design

• Tag Selection: The choice of tag depends on the application. HaloTag is often superior for single-color, live-cell super-resolution imaging with silicon rhodamine dyes due to its brighter signal and reduced bleaching [35]. SNAP-tag and CLIP-tag are ideal for orthogonal dual-color imaging. For large-scale pooled screens, HaloTag's covalent kinetics and versatility are advantageous [38]. SNAP-tag2 should be considered for experiments requiring the fastest labeling or maximum brightness with rhodamine probes [36].

• Fluorophore Choice: The dye profoundly impacts data quality. It is critical to select dyes that are bright, photostable, and exhibit low nonspecific binding to cellular components. Systematic evaluations have shown that among red-excitable dyes, Dy549 and CF640R are excellent for SNAP-tag single-molecule tracking due to their high photon output and low background [37]. Always verify cell permeability based on the experimental need.

• Controls: Essential controls include:

  • Untransfected cells + dye: Measures nonspecific dye retention.
  • Transfected cells + solvent control: Checks for autofluorescence.
  • Competition with unlabeled ligand: Validates specific labeling.

HaloTag, SNAP-tag, and CLIP-tag technologies provide a versatile and powerful platform for probing protein function in live cells. Their capacity for multi-color imaging, precise temporal control via pulse-chase experiments, and compatibility with advanced microscopy techniques like single-molecule tracking and STED nanoscopy make them indispensable for researching cellular activity history. The continued development of improved tags, such as SNAP-tag2, and an expanding palette of optimized fluorescent ligands promise to further empower researchers to dissect complex biological processes with ever-greater clarity and precision in vivo.

Understanding the precise subcellular localization of proteins is fundamental to elucidating their function, as the compartment in which a protein resides critically determines its activity, interaction partners, and regulation [39] [40]. Spatial proteomics has emerged as a powerful set of technologies to systematically map protein localization and capture dynamic protein movements between organelles. Traditional methods such as microscopy and cell fractionation with protein blotting are inherently low-throughput and limited to analyzing known components [41]. In contrast, modern mass spectrometry-based spatial proteomics enables unbiased, quantitative, and high-throughput measurement of subcellular protein distribution across the entire proteome [41] [40].

Among the various spatial proteomics approaches, proximity labeling technologies such as APEX (ascorbate peroxidase) and BioID have revolutionized our ability to study challenging biological systems, particularly organelles that are difficult to isolate by conventional biochemical methods [42] [43]. These techniques utilize engineered enzymes that generate reactive molecules to tag nearby proteins with biotin, allowing for subsequent affinity purification and mass spectrometric identification [42]. This review focuses on the application and advancement of these technologies, with special emphasis on mapping the proteomes of primary cilia and mitochondria—organelles critical for cellular signaling and metabolic regulation, and whose dysfunction underlies numerous human diseases.

Proximity Labeling Technologies: APEX, BioID, and Their Evolution

Fundamental Principles of Proximity Labeling

Proximity labeling technologies share a common conceptual framework: an enzyme is targeted to a specific cellular location of interest, where it catalyzes the tagging of nearby endogenous proteins with a biotin handle [42] [43]. These biotinylated proteins can then be isolated using streptavidin-based affinity purification and identified through quantitative mass spectrometry. The two primary enzyme systems used are:

• APEX (Engineered Ascorbate Peroxidase): Utilizes hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂) to oxidize biotin-phenol, generating short-lived biotin-phenoxyl radicals that covalently react with electron-rich amino acids on nearby proteins (<20 nm range) within seconds to minutes of activation [42] [43].
• BioID/TurboID (Promiscuous Biotin Ligases): Uses mutant biotin ligases that covalently attach biotin to lysine residues of proximal proteins in an ATP-dependent manner, typically over longer labeling periods (hours to days) [42].

A key advantage of APEX over BioID is its superior temporal resolution, as the labeling occurs within seconds to minutes rather than hours. However, conventional APEX has significant limitations, primarily the toxicity of its required substrate, hydrogen peroxide, and background labeling from endogenous peroxidases, which restrict its use primarily to specific cell types in vitro [43].

The iAPEX Breakthrough: Enhanced Specificity and Reduced Toxicity

To overcome the limitations of conventional APEX, researchers recently developed an innovative enzymatic cascade system termed in situ APEX activation (iAPEX) [43]. This system eliminates the need for external hydrogen peroxide addition by coupling APEX2 with D-amino acid oxidase (DAAO) from Rhodotorula gracilis to locally produce H₂O₂ (Figure 1).

iAPEX addresses three major challenges of conventional APEX:

• Expands applicability to additional biological systems, including cell types with high endogenous peroxidase activity
• Reduces toxicity by avoiding addition of exogenous H₂O₂ at mM concentrations
• Increases specificity of APEX labeling, circumventing complex genetic controls [43]

The iAPEX system functions through a two-enzyme cascade: DAAO first oxidizes inert D-amino acids (such as D-alanine) to produce H₂O₂ locally. Nearby APEX2 then uses this locally generated H₂O₂ to oxidize biotin-tyramide, producing phenoxyl radicals that biotinylate proximal proteins (Figure 1) [43]. This localized production of H₂O₂ is crucial, as experiments demonstrated that H₂O₂ produced in the cytoplasm does not efficiently diffuse into primary cilia, likely due to rapid detoxification mechanisms [43].

Figure 1: The iAPEX enzymatic cascade for specific proximity labeling. D-amino acid oxidase (DAAO) uses D-alanine to produce H₂O₂ locally, which then activates APEX2 to biotinylate nearby proteins.

Application to Organellar Proteome Mapping: Primary Cilia and Mitochondria

Mapping the Primary Cilia Proteome

Primary cilia are solitary, microtubule-based organelles that function as specialized signaling compartments, translating extracellular cues into cellular responses [43]. These organelles present exceptional challenges for proteomic analysis due to their extremely small volume—approximately 1:10,000th of the cell—making them difficult to isolate by classic biochemical methods [42] [43]. The primary cilium has a diameter of ~200-250 nm and length of 1-10 μm, corresponding to a volume on the order of tenths of a femtoliter [42].

Table 1: Comparison of Proteomic Methods for Primary Cilia Analysis

Method	Principle	Advantages	Limitations	Applications
Biochemical Isolation	Physical separation of cilia from cells	Direct sampling of ciliary content	Low yield and purity; technically demanding	Initial protein inventories of motile cilia
AP-MS/IP-MS	Affinity purification of protein complexes	Identifies direct interaction partners	Limited to known complexes; may miss transient interactions	Mapping ciliopathy-associated complexes (e.g., BBSome)
Conventional APEX	Peroxidase-mediated proximity labeling	High spatiotemporal resolution	H₂O₂ toxicity; background from endogenous peroxidases	Proteome mapping in permissive cell lines (e.g., IMCD3)
iAPEX	Enzymatic cascade (DAAO+APEX2)	Reduced toxicity; high specificity; broader applicability	Requires two enzyme components	Proteome mapping in challenging cell lines (C2C12, NIH/3T3) and in vivo models

Using iAPEX, researchers have successfully mapped the proteomes of primary cilia in cell lines previously inaccessible to conventional APEX labeling, including C2C12 myoblasts, 3T3-L1 pre-adipocytes, and NIH/3T3 fibroblasts [43]. These studies validated known ciliary proteins across distinct cell lines while also revealing differences that may reflect genuine heterogeneity in primary cilia proteomes—a potential explanation for the cell type-specific manifestations of ciliopathies [43].

Mitochondrial Proteome Mapping

Mitochondria, as essential organelles for energy production and cellular signaling, represent another prime target for proximity labeling approaches. While not explicitly detailed in the search results, the principles and applications of iAPEX can be directly extended to mitochondrial studies. The iAPEX system has been successfully employed for organelle-specific protein labeling with superb spatial resolution on mitochondria, demonstrating its potential to probe dynamic protein interactions at membrane-contact sites with sub-organelle resolution [43].

The ability to target iAPEX components to specific sub-mitochondrial compartments (outer membrane, inner membrane, matrix, or intermembrane space) would enable unprecedented resolution of mitochondrial sub-compartment proteomes and dynamic protein translocations in response to physiological stimuli or stress conditions.

Detailed Experimental Protocols

iAPEX Proximity Labeling for Primary Cilia Proteomics

Experimental Workflow for Ciliary iAPEX Labeling:

Figure 2: Experimental workflow for iAPEX-based primary cilia proteomics.

Step 1: Construct Design and Cell Line Generation

• Create fusion constructs targeting both APEX2 and DAAO to primary cilia using well-established ciliary targeting sequences (e.g., first 200 amino acids of NPHP3)
• Generate stable cell lines expressing both cilia-APEX2 and cilia-DAAO using appropriate selection markers
• Validate proper localization of both fusion proteins by immunofluorescence microscopy [43]

Step 2: Serum Starvation and Ciliogenesis

• Culture cells to ~70% confluence on appropriate tissue culture dishes
• Wash cells with PBS and replace complete media with serum-free media to induce ciliogenesis
• Incubate for 24-48 hours to allow primary cilia formation [43]

Step 3: iAPEX Labeling Reaction

• Prepare labeling solution: biotin-tyramide (e.g., 500 μM) and D-alanine (e.g., 10-50 mM) in serum-free media
• Replace starvation media with labeling solution
• Incubate for desired labeling time (typically 30-60 minutes) at 37°C
• Terminate reaction by washing cells with quenching solution (e.g., PBS containing 10 mM sodium azide, 10 mM sodium ascorbate, and 5 mM Trolox) [43]

Step 4: Streptavidin Affinity Purification

• Lyse cells in RIPA buffer containing protease inhibitors and quenching agents
• Clarify lysates by centrifugation
• Incubate with streptavidin-conjugated beads for 1-2 hours at 4°C with gentle rotation
• Wash beads extensively with lysis buffer, high-salt buffer (1 M KCl), and carbonate buffer (100 mM Na₂CO₃, pH 11.4) to remove nonspecific binders
• Elute bound proteins with Laemmli buffer containing 2 mM biotin and 2 mM DTT, or by on-bead tryptic digest [43]

Step 5: Mass Spectrometry Analysis

• Perform tryptic digestion of purified proteins (if not done on-bead)
• Desalt peptides using C18 stage tips
• Analyze peptides by liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS)
• Use label-free quantification or isobaric labeling (TMT, iTRAQ) for quantitative comparisons [43]

Step 6: Data Processing and Validation

• Process raw MS data using standard proteomics software (MaxQuant, Proteome Discoverer)
• Perform bioinformatic analysis to identify significantly enriched proteins compared to controls
• Validate key findings by orthogonal methods (immunofluorescence, Western blotting) [43]

Critical Controls and Validation Experiments

To ensure the specificity of iAPEX labeling, several control experiments are essential:

• Background Labeling Control: Perform iAPEX labeling in untransfected cells or cells expressing cilia-APEX2 alone (without cilia-DAAO) to assess D-alanine-dependent background [43]
• Localization Specificity Control: Express mislocalized APEX2 (e.g., cytoplasmic) with cilia-DAAO to confirm that labeling requires both enzymes in the same compartment [43]
• Spatial Validation: Use ultrastructure expansion microscopy (U-ExM) to confirm the sub-ciliary localization of biotinylated proteins at high resolution [43]

Table 2: Key Reagents for iAPEX-based Organellar Proteomics

Reagent Category	Specific Examples	Function/Purpose	Considerations
Enzyme Components	APEX2, miniTurbo	Proximity labeling enzyme	Select based on desired temporal resolution
H₂O₂ Generation	DAAO (from R. gracilis)	Local H₂O₂ production	Requires D-amino acid substrates
Targeting Sequences	NPHP3(1-200), ARL13B	Organelle-specific targeting	Verify localization in your cell type
Labeling Substrates	Biotin-tyramide, D-alanine	Biotin donor and H₂O₂ precursor	Optimize concentration for each cell type
Quenching Reagents	Sodium ascorbate, Trolox	Neutralize reactive radicals	Essential to minimize background
Purification Matrix	Streptavidin beads	Affinity capture of biotinylated proteins	High-capacity beads recommended
MS Standards	TMT labels, SILAC amino acids	Quantitative proteomics	Choose based on experimental design

Integration with Cellular Activity Mapping

The development of enzymatic tagging approaches extends beyond structural proteome mapping to functional activity mapping. Recent work on Ca²⁺-activated split-TurboID (CaST) demonstrates how enzyme-catalyzed tagging can record cellular activity history in vivo [5] [44] [45]. CaST labels activated cells within 10 minutes with exogenously delivered biotin, acting as a time-gated integrator of total Ca²⁺ activity [5].

This capability to correlate proteomic information with functional activity history represents a powerful future direction for spatial proteomics. The combination of iAPEX for high-resolution structural proteome mapping with activity-dependent tagging systems like CaST could enable unprecedented understanding of how protein localization and organellar composition change in response to specific activation patterns in complex physiological environments.

The advent of iAPEX technology represents a significant advancement in spatial proteomics, addressing key limitations of conventional APEX by reducing toxicity, improving specificity, and expanding applicability to challenging biological systems. The successful application of iAPEX to map primary cilia proteomes in previously inaccessible cell lines demonstrates its potential to uncover cell type-specific organellar compositions that may underlie phenotypic heterogeneity in genetic disorders such as ciliopathies [43].

Future developments in spatial proteomics will likely focus on enhancing temporal resolution, enabling simultaneous multi-organelle mapping, and improving compatibility with in vivo applications. The proof-of-concept demonstration of iAPEX in Xenopus laevis provides promising evidence for the potential of these technologies in whole-organism studies [43]. As these methodologies continue to evolve, they will undoubtedly provide deeper insights into the dynamic spatial organization of the proteome and its alterations in development, physiology, and disease.

The ability to tag and record cellular activity history in freely behaving animals is transformative for neuroscience and behavioral research, moving beyond the constraints of head-fixed setups. Biochemical tagging using biotin-based technologies, such as Ca2+-activated split-TurboID (CaST), provides a powerful solution. This enzyme-catalyzed system rapidly labels activated cells with biotin in vivo, acting as a time-gated integrator of cellular activity without requiring light, thus enabling non-invasive application in untethered animals [5]. This protocol details the practical implementation of biotin delivery and signal detection for capturing cellular activity history in freely moving subjects, providing a standardized framework for the research community.

Biotin-Based Activity Tagging: Mechanism and Workflow

CaST is an engineered enzyme that functions as a coincidence detector, reconstituting active split-TurboID only in the presence of both elevated intracellular calcium and exogenous biotin [5]. This reconstitution enables the rapid biotinylation of proximal proteins within a user-defined time window, permanently tagging cells that were active during that period.

Research Reagent Solutions

The following table catalogues essential materials and reagents required for implementing the CaST protocol in freely behaving animals.

Table 1: Essential Research Reagents and Materials

Reagent/Material	Function/Description	Example Specifications
CaST Construct	Bicistronic vector (CaST-IRES) expressing both enzyme fragments; ensures co-expression in target cells [5].	AAV-CaST-IRES (Titer: >1e12 GC/mL)
Biotin	Exogenous cofactor; covalently attached to proteins by reconstituted CaST during neuronal activation [5].	Water-soluble, cell-permeable biotin (e.g., Biotin-XX, sulfosuccinimidyl-6-(biotinamido)hexanoate)
Viral Vector	For in vivo delivery of CaST construct to target brain regions [5].	Adeno-Associated Virus (AAV) serotype (e.g., AAV9 for neuronal tropism)
Streptavidin Conjugates	For post-hoc detection of biotinylated proteins [5].	Streptavidin-Alexa Fluor 647 (IF), Streptavidin-HRP (Western Blot)
Fixative	Tissue preservation for histological analysis [46].	4% Paraformaldehyde (PFA) in PBS
Biotinylated Protein Standards	Positive controls for detection and quantification assays.	Biotinylated Molecular Weight Marker

Quantitative Parameters for Biotin Delivery

Successful tagging requires optimization of biotin dosage, route, and timing. The following table summarizes key quantitative parameters based on empirical data.

Table 2: Biotin Delivery and Detection Parameters

Parameter	Recommended Specification	Experimental Evidence & Rationale
Biotin Dosage	10-50 mg/kg (in vivo mice studies) [5]	Effective for blood-brain barrier penetration and cellular uptake.
Labeling Time Window	As short as 10 minutes [5]	Enables rapid tagging of neuronal ensembles activated by brief stimuli.
Time to Signal Detection	Immediate (post-tagging) [5]	No protein expression wait time vs. transcriptional reporters (6-18 hours).
Administration Route	Intraperitoneal (IP) Injection [5]	Ensures systemic distribution and reliable bioavailability. Oral gavage is an alternative [46].
Detection Limit (Fluorescence)	~50-fold fluorescence increase post-activation [47]	Enables clear signal-to-noise discrimination in imaging.
Tissue Processing Delay	Fixation within 24-48 hours post-perfusion	Maintains integrity of biotin-streptavidin binding for accurate detection.

Detailed Experimental Protocols

Protocol: Viral-Mediated CaST Expression in Target Brain Regions

This protocol ensures stable and specific expression of the CaST system in the brain region of interest.

• Stereotaxic Surgery: Anesthetize the animal (e.g., using isoflurane: 4% induction, 1-2% maintenance) and secure it in a stereotaxic frame. Maintain body temperature with a heating pad.
• Craniotomy: Aseptically perform a small craniotomy above the target brain region (e.g., Prefrontal Cortex for psilocybin studies [5]).
• Viral Injection: Using a glass micropipette and a microinjection pump, inject 300-500 nL of AAV-CaST-IRES (titer >1e12 GC/mL) into the target coordinates.
• Recovery: Allow a minimum of 2-4 weeks for robust viral expression and protein stabilization before commencing behavioral experiments or biotin delivery.

Protocol: In Vivo Biotin Delivery for Activity Tagging

This protocol outlines the procedure for administering biotin to freely behaving animals to capture cellular activity during a specific behavioral window.

• Biotin Solution Preparation: Dissolve biotin in sterile saline or distilled water to achieve a final concentration suitable for a dosing volume of 5-10 mL/kg for IP injection [46] [5]. Filter-sterilize the solution (0.22 µm filter).
• Behavioral Paradigm: Subject the animal to the planned experimental task (e.g., auditory decision-making, psilocybin exposure [5]).
• Biotin Administration: Administer the biotin solution via IP injection at the precise onset of the behavioral experience to be tagged. The labeling window is defined by the presence of biotin in the system (e.g., 10-30 minutes) [5].
• Post-Injection Behavior: Allow the animal to continue behaving freely for the duration of the chosen labeling window to ensure capture of the relevant activity pattern.

Protocol: Tissue Collection and Signal Detection

This protocol covers the post-behavioral procedures for tissue processing and visualization of biotin-tagged cells.

• Perfusion and Fixation: At the end of the biotin labeling window, deeply anesthetize the animal and perform transcardial perfusion with ice-cold PBS followed by 4% PFA. Dissect the brain and post-fix in 4% PFA for 12-24 hours at 4°C, then transfer to a 30% sucrose solution for cryoprotection.
• Tissue Sectioning: Section the fixed brain into 30-40 µm thick coronal slices using a cryostat or vibratome.
• Streptavidin-Based Detection:
  • For Immunofluorescence: Incubate free-floating sections with a streptavidin-conjugated fluorophore (e.g., Streptavidin-Alexa Fluor 647, 1:1000 dilution) in blocking buffer for 2 hours at room temperature. Wash thoroughly, mount slides, and image using a confocal microscope [5].
  • For Western Blot: Homogenize fresh or frozen tissue. Incubate lysates with streptavidin-conjugated beads to pull down biotinylated proteins. Separate via SDS-PAGE, transfer to a membrane, and probe with streptavidin-HRP for chemiluminescent detection [5].
• Data Analysis: Quantify the biotin signal intensity and distribution. Compare experimental groups to controls (e.g., animals not expressing CaST or not receiving behavioral stimulus) to identify specifically tagged active cells.

Integrated Workflow for Activity History Tagging

The entire process, from preparation to analysis, is summarized in the following workflow diagram, highlighting the parallel paths for animal preparation and experimental execution.

A central challenge in modern neuroscience is the precise mapping of neural activity to specific behaviors in freely moving animals. Traditional methods for recording neuronal activity, such as two-photon microscopy or implanted electrophysiology systems, often require head fixation or skull-mounted devices, which can tether the animal and restrict natural behavior [48] [49]. Furthermore, many activity reporters rely on immediate early gene (IEG) expression, which provides excellent cellular resolution but suffers from a slow onset, taking several hours to produce a detectable signal and thus missing rapid, transient activity patterns [5] [50].

The field of biochemical tagging has emerged to address these limitations by creating permanent molecular marks within neurons that are active during a user-defined time window. This case study focuses on the application of a groundbreaking tool—Ca2+-activated split-TurboID (CaST)—to correlate neural activity with behavior in completely untethered, freely behaving mice. We will detail the methodology, present quantitative validation data, and demonstrate its application in a study of psilocybin-induced neuronal activation and behavior, framed within the broader context of mapping cellular activity history in vivo [5].

Principle of Operation

The CaST system is an engineered, enzyme-catalyzed approach for rapidly tagging cells experiencing elevated intracellular calcium (Ca2+), a ubiquitous proxy for neuronal firing. The fundamental design tethers the Ca2+-binding protein calmodulin (CaM) and a CaM-binding synthetic peptide (M13) to the two inactive halves of the proximity-labeling enzyme split-TurboID [5].

The system functions as a biochemical coincidence detector. Reconstitution of active TurboID enzyme occurs only during periods of high cytosolic Ca2+, which causes CaM to recruit the M13 peptide. This reconstituted enzyme then uses an exogenously delivered biotin molecule to covalently tag nearby proteins on activated cells. The requirement for both high Ca2+ and the presence of biotin ensures temporal specificity, as the labeling window is confined to the period of biotin delivery [5].

Key Advantages Over Existing Methods

• Speed: CaST labels activated cells within 10 minutes of biotin delivery, and the biotinylated signal can be read out immediately thereafter. This is in stark contrast to transcriptional reporters like TRAP2 or Cal-Light, which require 6-18 hours to produce a detectable signal [5].
• Non-Invasiveness: Unlike light-dependent tools such as CaMPARI2 [48] or FLiCRE [5], CaST does not require invasive implants or optical fibers to deliver light to deep brain structures, enabling studies in fully untethered mice.
• Universality: Ca2+ is a universal second messenger for cell signaling, making CaST applicable across a wide range of cell types, unlike IEG-based methods whose dependency on specific promoter activity can vary [5].
• Temporal Gating: The system is reversible. Enzymes reconstituted during high Ca2+ before biotin delivery will split back into inactive fragments once Ca2+ levels drop, preventing non-specific labeling outside the intended biotin window [5].

Comparative Analysis of Biochemical Tagging Technologies

The following table summarizes how CaST compares to other prominent methods for stable neuronal activity tagging.

Table 1: Comparison of Methods for Tagging Neuronal Activity History

Feature	CaST (Ca2+-activated split-TurboID)	CaMPARI2	Transcriptional Reporters (e.g., TRAP2, c-Fos tTA)
Activation Trigger	Elevated intracellular Ca2+	Elevated Ca2+ + 400 nm light	Neuronal activity (via IEG promoters like c-Fos)
Tagging Mechanism	Enzyme-catalyzed protein biotinylation	Irreversible photoconversion (green→red)	Drug-dependent (e.g., Dox) transcription of reporter
Temporal Resolution	~10 minutes [5]	Seconds to minutes (during illumination)	Hours (~6-18 hours) [5] [50]
Readout Signal	Biotinylation (streptavidin-based)	Fluorescence (Red/Green ratio)	Reporter protein (e.g., GFP, mCherry)
Deep-Tissue Compatibility	High (biotin is blood-brain barrier permeable)	Low (requires light delivery)	High (drug-administered)
Tethered/Head Fixation?	No (fully untethered)	Optional (but light source required)	No (fully untethered)
Primary Advantage	Speed & non-invasiveness	Large volumetric snapshots	Cell-type specific targeting

Detailed Experimental Protocol

This protocol outlines the key steps for using CaST to tag neurons activated during a behavioral assay, using the example of psilocybin-induced head-twitch response in mice [5].

Viral Vector Preparation and Stereotaxic Injection

Goal: Deliver the CaST construct to the target brain region (e.g., Prefrontal Cortex, PFC).

• Viral Construct: Utilize a bi-cistronic adeno-associated virus (AAV) carrying the optimized CaST-IRES construct. This ensures coordinated expression of both CD4-sTb(C)-M13 and CaM-V5-sTb(N) fragments from a single promoter [5].
• Animal Preparation: Anesthetize an 8-12 week-old C57BL/6J mouse and secure it in a stereotaxic frame. Maintain aseptic technique throughout the surgery [50].
• Stereotaxic Injection: Using a microsyringe, inject ~500 nL of the high-titer AAV (~1x10^13 GC/mL) into the prelimbic region of the PFC (coordinates from Bregma: e.g., +1.9 mm AP, ±0.4 mm ML, -2.2 mm DV).
• Recovery: Allow 3-4 weeks for robust viral expression and tool maturation before commencing behavioral experiments.

Behavioral Paradigm and Activity Tagging

Goal: Label PFC neurons activated during a psilocybin-induced behavioral state.

• Biotin Preparation: Prepare a sterile solution of biotin (e.g., 10 mM in saline) for systemic injection. Biotin can cross the blood-brain barrier, enabling non-invasive delivery [5].
• Behavioral Session:
  • Administer psilocybin (e.g., 1 mg/kg, i.p.) to the mouse in a clean behavioral arena.
  • Simultaneously, inject biotin (e.g., 10 mg/kg, i.p.) to initiate the activity-tagging window.
  • Allow the mouse to behave freely for 10-30 minutes. Videotape the session for subsequent behavioral analysis (e.g., quantification of head-twitch responses).
• Tagging Termination: The labeling window concludes upon clearance of biotin from the brain. No washing step is required in vivo.

Tissue Processing and Analysis

Goal: Detect biotinylated proteins to identify activated neurons and correlate with behavior.

• Perfusion and Fixation: At the end of the behavioral session (or shortly after), deeply anesthetize the mouse and transcardially perfuse with PBS followed by 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA).
• Sectioning: Extract the brain, post-fix in PFA, and section the PFC on a vibratome (40-50 μm thickness).
• Immunohistochemistry:
  • Incubate free-floating sections with a fluorescently conjugated streptavidin probe (e.g., Streptavidin-Alexa Fluor 647, 1:500) to visualize the biotin signal.
  • Co-stain with neuronal markers (e.g., Anti-NeuN, 1:1000) and a nuclear stain (e.g., DAPI) for context.
• Imaging and Quantification: Image sections using confocal or two-photon microscopy. The CaST signal is quantified as the streptavidin fluorescence intensity normalized to the expression level of the tool (e.g., GFP fluorescence from one of the fragments) [5].
• Correlation Analysis: Correlate the CaST signal intensity (or density of labeled neurons) in the PFC with the frequency of head-twitch responses measured during the behavioral session on a per-animal basis.

Key Experimental Data and Validation

The utility of CaST is demonstrated by its robust and quantifiable performance in experimental settings.

Table 2: Quantitative Characterization of CaST Performance [5]

Parameter	Result	Experimental Context
Minimum Tagging Time	< 10 minutes	HEK293T cells & in vivo
Signal-to-Background Ratio (SBR)	5-fold increase	CaST-IRES, HEK cells, Biotin+Ca2+ vs. Biotin alone
Detection Accuracy (AUC)	0.93 (CaST-IRES)	Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis
Optimal Transfection Ratio	5:2 (CD4-sTb(C)-M13 : CaM-V5-sTb(N))	Initial construct optimization in HEK cells
Reversibility	Full (no signal post-Ca2+ washout)	Reversibility assay in HEK cells

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Research Reagents

Table 3: Key Reagents for CaST-based Research

Reagent	Function	Example Source / Note
AAV-CaST (IRES version)	Deliver the optimized CaST construct in vivo*	Custom generation from viral core facilities [5]
Biotin	Small molecule substrate for TurboID; crosses the blood-brain barrier.	Sigma-Aldrich (e.g., B4639) [5]
Fluorescent Streptavidin	Primary readout reagent for detecting biotinylated proteins.	Jackson ImmunoResearch (e.g., Streptavidin-Alexa Fluor 647) [5]
Psilocybin	Pharmacological stimulus to induce neuronal activation and behavior.	Licensed compound supplier (e.g., Cayman Chemical) [5]
Anti-NeuN Antibody	Neuronal marker for immunohistochemical contextualization.	Millipore (e.g., ABN78)
c-Fos-tTA & TRE-hM3Dq AAVs	For chemogenetic manipulation of activated ensembles (alternative/method).	Vigene Biosciences, BrainVTA [50]

The CaST system represents a significant leap forward in our ability to capture and correlate neural activity with naturalistic behavior. Its unique combination of speed, sensitivity, and non-invasiveness allows researchers to create precise biochemical records of cellular activity history in the brains of completely untethered mice. The detailed protocol and quantitative data provided herein serve as a roadmap for implementing this technology. As part of the expanding toolkit for in vivo biochemistry, CaST opens new avenues for mapping functional neural circuits, screening the efficacy and engagement of neuropharmacological compounds, and ultimately, deciphering the neural code underlying complex behavior.

Troubleshooting Biochemical Tagging: Solving Common Problems and Optimizing Signal

Addressing Non-Specific Labeling and Background in APEX-Based Systems

In vivo research aiming to record cellular activity history via biochemical tagging heavily relies on proximity labeling (PL) technologies, with Ascorbate peroxidase (APEX) being a prominent tool. Conventional APEX-based methods require the external addition of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), which presents two significant challenges for sensitive biological systems: it can cause substantial oxidative toxicity to cells and tissues, and it activates endogenous peroxidases, leading to high levels of non-specific background labeling [43]. This background often obscures specific labeling signals, complicating data interpretation and requiring complex, time-consuming genetic controls [43] [51]. This document outlines the principles and detailed protocols for an in situ APEX activation (iAPEX) system, a novel enzymatic cascade that minimizes these drawbacks, enhancing the fidelity of proteomic mapping in challenging in vivo contexts [43].

The iAPEX Solution: Principle and Workflow

The iAPEX system addresses the limitations of conventional APEX by replacing the external application of H2O2 with controlled, local production via a second enzyme, D-amino acid oxidase (DAAO) [43].

Core Principle

The engineered cascade involves co-expressing two enzymes targeted to the same subcellular location:

• APEX2: The peroxidase that uses H2O2 to oxidize biotin-phenol (e.g., biotin tyramide) into phenoxyl radicals that covalently tag nearby endogenous proteins [43] [51].
• D-amino acid oxidase (DAAO): An oxidase from Rhodotorula gracilis that uses D-amino acids as its substrate to locally generate H2O2 [43].

This co-localization ensures that H2O2 is produced precisely where APEX2 is located, providing the substrate for the labeling reaction without exposing the entire cell to oxidative stress. The system remains inert until the addition of a D-amino acid (e.g., D-Alanine), offering temporal control over the labeling process [43].

Key Advantages

• Reduced Toxicity: Avoids the need for high, toxic concentrations of externally applied H2O2 [43].
• Enhanced Specificity: Local H2O2 generation minimizes the activation of distal endogenous peroxidases, drastically reducing non-specific background [43].
• Versatility: Proven to be effective in cellular microdomains (primary cilium, mitochondria, lipid droplets) and in vivo models like Xenopus laevis [43].

Workflow Diagram

The following diagram illustrates the logical workflow of the iAPEX system, from construct design to proteomic analysis.

Key Research Reagent Solutions

The successful implementation of the iAPEX protocol depends on the following key reagents.

Table 1: Essential Reagents for iAPEX Experiments

Reagent	Function / Description	Notes & Considerations
APEX2 Enzyme	Engineered ascorbate peroxidase; catalyzes biotinylation.	Fused to your protein of interest (POI) for localization [43].
DAAO (from R. gracilis)	D-amino acid oxidase; generates H2O2 locally upon D-amino acid addition.	Must be co-localized with APEX2 for effective cascade [43].
Biotin-Tyramide (Biotin-Phenol)	APEX substrate; oxidized to form reactive radicals that label proximal proteins.	Handle and store as per manufacturer's instructions [43] [51].
D-Amino Acid Substrate (e.g., D-Ala)	Substrate for DAAO to trigger the H2O2 production cascade.	D-Alanine, D-Serine are effective; D-Valine is not a good substrate [43].
Streptavidin Beads	High-affinity capture of biotinylated proteins for purification.	Critical for downstream proteomic analysis or Western blotting [43] [51].
Cell/Tissue Culture Media	Environment for maintaining biological system during labeling.	Must be free of contaminating peroxidases for clean results.

Quantitative Performance Data

The iAPEX system demonstrates superior performance by mitigating the primary drawbacks of conventional APEX.

Table 2: Performance Comparison: Conventional APEX vs. iAPEX

Parameter	Conventional APEX (with H₂O₂)	iAPEX (with DAAO)	Experimental Context
H₂O₂ Concentration	~1 mM (added externally)	Generated locally, concentration not defined	Labeling reaction in cell culture [43].
Specific Biotinylation	Yes, but often masked by high background	Strong and specific to target locale	NIH/3T3 fibroblasts expressing cilia-targeted constructs [43].
Non-Specific Background	High (independent of APEX2 expression)	Significantly reduced	Western blot analysis in NIH/3T3 cells [43].
Cellular Toxicity	Significant oxidative damage	Minimized	Observation in various cell lines and Xenopus laevis [43].
Spatial Control	Moderate (depends on H₂O₂ diffusion)	High (dependent on DAAO localization)	Ultrastructure expansion microscopy (U-ExM) in IMCD3 cells [43].

Detailed Experimental Protocol

This protocol describes the application of iAPEX for profiling the proteome of a cellular microdomain, such as the primary cilium.

Required Materials

• Cell line stably co-expressing POI-APEX2 and POI-DAAO.
• Labeling buffer (e.g., DPBS or live-cell imaging-compatible buffer).
• Biotin-Tyramide stock solution (e.g., 50 mM in DMSO).
• D-Amino Acid stock solution (e.g., 1M D-Alanine in water).
• Quenching solution (e.g., a cocktail of antioxidants such as Trolox and sodium ascorbate, or DPBS with 1M Sodium Azide (NaN₃) and 1M Catalase for H₂O₂ quenching in controls).
• Lysis buffer (e.g., RIPA buffer supplemented with protease inhibitors and quenching agents).

Step-by-Step Procedure

• Cell Preparation: Culture cells stably expressing the organelle-targeted APEX2 and DAAO constructs under the required conditions. For primary cilia studies, serum-starve cells to induce ciliogenesis.
• Reaction Initiation: Replace the culture medium with a pre-warmed labeling medium containing a final concentration of 50-500 µM Biotin-Tyramide. Initiate the labeling reaction by adding the DAAO substrate (e.g., D-Alanine) to a final concentration of 10-50 mM. Mix gently.
• Incubation: Incubate the cells for the desired labeling duration (e.g., 30 minutes) at 37°C. This time should be optimized for the specific system.
• Quenching and Wash: Remove the labeling medium and quickly wash the cells 2-3 times with a large volume of quenching solution (e.g., DPBS containing Trolox and sodium ascorbate, or NaN₃ and catalase) to stop all peroxidase activity.
• Cell Lysis: Lyse the cells on ice using a suitable lysis buffer (e.g., RIPA) supplemented with protease inhibitors and the quenching agents used in the previous step.
• Streptavidin Affinity Purification: Clarify the lysate by centrifugation. Incubate the supernatant with streptavidin-coated beads for 1-2 hours at 4°C with gentle agitation.
• Wash and Elution: Wash the beads stringently with lysis buffer, followed by a high-salt wash buffer (e.g., 1M KCl) and a final wash with a neutral buffer (e.g., 50mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5). Biotinylated proteins can be eluted by boiling in SDS-PAGE loading buffer containing excess biotin (e.g., 2mM) for analysis by Western Blot or prepared for on-bead tryptic digestion for Mass Spectrometry.

Critical Control Experiments

• Specificity Control: Express DAAO in a different subcellular compartment (e.g., cytosol). Labeling should be minimal unless APEX2 is also present at that location, confirming the dependence on co-localization [43].
• Background Assessment: Include a condition without the D-amino acid substrate to confirm that labeling is dependent on the iAPEX cascade.

The iAPEX system represents a significant advancement for in vivo biochemical tagging by directly addressing the critical limitations of non-specific labeling and cellular toxicity associated with traditional APEX. The provided protocol and data establish a robust framework for researchers to implement this technology, enabling high-fidelity spatial proteomics in previously challenging biological systems and paving the way for more accurate mapping of cellular activity history.

The use of hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂) in biomedical research presents a fundamental challenge: harnessing its valuable biochemical properties while mitigating its inherent cytotoxicity. This application note details practical strategies to overcome this challenge, with a specific focus on enabling safer in vivo use, particularly in the emerging field of biochemical tagging of cellular activity history. H₂O₂ serves as a critical signaling molecule and effector in numerous cellular processes, but its potent toxicity via Fenton chemistry—where intracellular Fe(II) catalyzes the conversion of H₂O₂ to highly reactive hydroxyl radicals—has limited its research applications [52]. The cytotoxicity of H₂O₂ manifests primarily through DNA damage, lipid peroxidation, and disruption of mitochondrial membrane potential (ΔΨm), ultimately leading to apoptotic cell death [53] [54]. Recent advances in understanding H₂O₂ gradients across cell membranes and the development of potentiated toxicity approaches now provide researchers with sophisticated tools to utilize H₂O₂'s unique properties while minimizing adverse effects on cellular systems [55] [52]. These strategies are particularly relevant for techniques such as Ca²⁺-activated split-TurboID (CaST), which enables rapid, biochemical tagging of cellular activity history in vivo without requiring invasive light delivery systems [5] [45].

Scientific Foundations of H₂O₂ Cytotoxicity

Mechanisms of H₂O₂-Induced Cell Damage

The cytotoxicity of H₂O₂ stems from its unique chemical properties and interaction with intracellular components. Though relatively stable in abiotic environments, H₂O₂ becomes highly reactive upon crossing cell membranes due to its interaction with intracellular iron. The Fenton reaction (Fe(II) + H₂O₂ → Fe(III) + OH· + OH⁻) generates hydroxyl radicals that rapidly damage cellular components at diffusion-limited rates [52]. This life-specific reactivity occurs because cells actively accumulate iron (0.1-1.0 mM total iron) to support essential metabolic functions, creating an environment where Fenton chemistry can proceed efficiently [52].

The primary cellular damage mechanisms include:

• DNA damage: Hydroxyl radicals cause DNA strand breaks and base modifications, with DNA repair mutants showing exquisite sensitivity to H₂O₂ [52]
• Mitochondrial dysfunction: H₂O₂ exposure reduces mitochondrial membrane potential (ΔΨm), disrupting energy production and leading to depletion of adenosine triphosphate (ATP) [54]
• Lipid peroxidation: Membrane phospholipids are particularly vulnerable to hydroxyl radical attack, compromising cellular integrity [53]
• Calcium homeostasis disruption: H₂O₂ induces abnormal intracellular Ca²⁺ accumulation, triggering aberrant signaling and activation of degradative enzymes [53]

Quantitative Aspects of H₂O₂ Cytotoxicity

The cytotoxic potency of H₂O₂ depends critically on experimental parameters including cell concentration, exposure time, and extracellular environment. Research demonstrates that median cytotoxic concentrations (EC₅₀) decrease from approximately 500 μM to 30 μM as incubation time increases from 1 to 24 hours [56]. The area under the concentration versus time curve (AUC) provides a cell concentration-independent measure of toxic potency, with a median cytotoxic AUC of 1800 μM × min observed in C6 glioma cells [56].

Table 1: Cytotoxicity Parameters of H₂O₂ in Mammalian Cell Cultures

Parameter	Value Range	Experimental Conditions	Reference
EC₅₀ (1h exposure)	~500 μM	C6 glioma cells	[56]
EC₅₀ (24h exposure)	~30 μM	C6 glioma cells	[56]
Median cytotoxic AUC	1800 μM × min	C6 glioma cells	[56]
Threshold for ΔΨm reduction	150 μM	Meningothelial cells, 48h	[54]
Cytotoxicity in PBS vs. complete medium	Much higher in PBS	HeLa cells	[57]
Protective FBS concentration	10%	Cell culture models	[57]

The extracellular environment significantly influences H₂O₂ toxicity. Cells treated in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) show dramatically higher sensitivity compared to treatment in complete culture medium, with serum components providing substantial protection [57]. The presence of pyruvate, which reacts with H₂O₂, offers additional protection and reduces effective H₂O₂ concentrations [57].

H₂O₂ Gradients and Cellular Defense Systems

Extracellular-to-Intracellular H₂O₂ Gradients

Cells maintain substantial H₂O₂ concentration gradients across their membranes as a fundamental protective mechanism. Research using genetically encoded biosensors like HyPer has quantified these gradients, revealing that normal human cells can maintain extracellular-to-intracellular H₂O₂ gradients of thousands of times under oxidative stress [55]. The functional status of thioredoxin-dependent enzymatic systems primarily drives this gradient dependence on oxidative load in human cells [55].

At high H₂O₂ concentrations (>50 μM), which cause exhaustion of thioredoxin activity in the cell cytoplasm, the gradient stabilizes, indicating the critical role of thioredoxin-dependent systems in managing H₂O₂ stress [55]. Cancer cell lines (K-562 and HeLa) demonstrate less potent gradient formation, with cytoplasmic H₂O₂ levels several hundred times lower than extracellular concentrations, compared to thousands of times in normal cells [55].

Enzymatic Defense Systems

Cellular protection against H₂O₂ toxicity primarily involves three enzymatic systems:

• Catalases: Heme-containing enzymes that rapidly convert H₂O₂ to water and oxygen; these are diffusion-limited enzymes capable of scavenging low millimolar concentrations of H₂O₂ during acute exposures [52]
• Peroxiredoxins: Critical components of the cellular defense that can collapse under high H₂O₂ doses due to hyperoxidation [55]
• Glutathione peroxidases: Work in concert with thioredoxins to reduce oxidized proteins and eliminate H₂O₂ [55]

The collaboration between these systems creates a robust defense network, but one that can be overwhelmed at high H₂O₂ concentrations or through targeted inhibition.

Strategic Approaches for Mitigating H₂O₂ Cytotoxicity

Potentiated Toxicity Strategies

Potentiated toxicity approaches represent a promising strategy for achieving specific cellular effects while using lower, less toxic H₂O₂ concentrations. This concept involves using sublethal concentrations of a potentiator agent that inhibits cellular defenses against H₂O₂, thereby increasing its effective toxicity without requiring high, difficult-to-achieve H₂O₂ concentrations [52].

Potential potentiator agents include:

• Cyanide: Binds heme iron in catalases, inhibiting their protective function [52]
• Nitric oxide (NO): Can inhibit catalases and may promote iron recruitment into DNA-iron complexes [52]
• Hydrogen sulfide (H₂S): Emerging as a potential modulator of H₂O₂ toxicity [52]

Recent research has explored H₂O₂-activated H₂S-donating hybrid prodrugs that concurrently liberate hydrogen sulfide, a purported cardioprotectant with anticancer activity, demonstrating reduced apoptotic effects compared to conventional treatments like doxorubicin while maintaining therapeutic efficacy [58].

Application in Biochemical Tagging Systems

The Ca²⁺-activated split-TurboID (CaST) system represents a cutting-edge application where controlled H₂O₂ responses are essential. This enzyme-catalyzed approach rapidly tags cells with elevated Ca²⁺ in vivo within 10 minutes using exogenously delivered biotin [5]. The system functions as a coincidence detector requiring both elevated intracellular Ca²⁺ and exogenous biotin supplementation, ensuring precise temporal control [5].

Table 2: Research Reagent Solutions for H₂O₂ Management

Reagent/Category	Specific Examples	Function/Application	Research Context
H₂O₂ Biosensors	HyPer	Quantitative measurement of intracellular H₂O₂	Live-cell imaging of oxidative stress [55]
Control Biosensors	SypHer	Redox-inactive control for HyPer	Control experiments [55]
Antioxidant Compounds	Scutellarin	Attenuates H₂O₂-induced cytotoxicity, reduces ROS and Ca²⁺ accumulation	Neuroprotection studies [53]
H₂O₂-Activated Prodrugs	H₂S-Donating hybrids	Concurrently liberate H₂S in response to H₂O₂	Cardioprotective chemotherapeutics [58]
Plasma-Activated Solutions	PAPBS, PAM	Generate stable H₂O₂ and other ROS for controlled exposure	Antimicrobial and cytotoxic studies [57]
Genetic Tools	CaST system	Tags cells with elevated Ca²⁺ using biotin	Neural activity mapping [5] [11]

For the CaST system, the membrane-tethered CD4-sTb(C)-M13-GFP with cytosolic CaM-V5-sTb(N) has been optimized to achieve the highest signal-to-background ratio [5]. Using an internal ribosome entry site (IRES) rather than a P2A peptide linker further improves performance, likely due to better-controlled expression ratios of the two components [5].

Experimental Protocols

Protocol 1: Quantitative Assessment of H₂O₂ Cytotoxicity

Objective: Determine concentration- and time-dependent cytotoxicity of H₂O₂ in cell cultures.

Materials:

• Cell line of interest (e.g., C6 glioma, HeLa, or primary cells)
• H₂O₂ stock solution (freshly prepared or properly stored)
• Complete cell culture medium with and without serum
• Pyruvate-free DMEM for comparing protective effects
• MTT or crystal violet staining solutions for viability assessment

Procedure:

• Seed cells at varying concentrations (104 to 106 cells/mL) in appropriate multi-well plates and incubate overnight.
• Prepare fresh H₂O₂ dilutions in the relevant medium (with/without serum, with/without pyruvate).
• Remove culture medium and add H₂O₂ solutions at desired concentrations (typically 25-500 μM range).
• Incubate for varying time periods (1-48 hours) at 37°C.
• Assess cytotoxicity using multiple methods:
  • MTT assay for metabolic activity
  • Crystal violet staining for adherent cell count
  • LDH release for membrane integrity
  • Flow cytometry with Annexin V/PI for apoptosis detection
• Calculate EC₅₀ values for each time point and cell concentration.
• Determine AUC values for H₂O₂ toxicity normalization across different experimental conditions.

Key Considerations:

• Always include serum-free and pyruvate-containing conditions to assess protective effects
• Account for cell concentration effects on nominal EC₅₀ values
• Use freshly prepared H₂O₂ solutions to ensure accurate concentrations
• Consider using catalase controls to confirm H₂O₂-specific effects

Protocol 2: Measuring H₂O₂ Gradients Using Genetically Encoded Biosensors

Objective: Quantify extracellular-to-intracellular H₂O₂ gradients under oxidative stress.

Materials:

• Cells expressing HyPer biosensor (or similar H₂O₂-sensitive probe)
• Control cells expressing redox-insensitive SypHer
• Flow cytometer or fluorescence plate reader
• H₂O₂ solutions prepared in appropriate extracellular buffer
• Specific inhibitors (e.g., thioredoxin reductase inhibitors)

Procedure:

• Culture HyPer-expressing cells under standard conditions.
• Harvest cells and resuspend in appropriate experimental buffer.
• Divide cell suspension into aliquots for different H₂O₂ concentrations.
• Using flow cytometry, monitor HyPer fluorescence (excitation: 420/500 nm, emission: 515 nm) before and after H₂O₂ addition.
• Calculate fluorescence ratio (500/420 nm excitation) to determine HyPer oxidation state.
• Generate calibration curves using predetermined H₂O₂ concentrations.
• Calculate intracellular H₂O₂ concentrations from fluorescence ratios.
• Determine extracellular-to-intracellular gradient by comparing calculated intracellular concentrations with known extracellular concentrations.
• Repeat experiments under conditions of antioxidant system inhibition.

Key Considerations:

• Perform experiments at low oxidative loads (<50 μM) and high loads (>50 μM) to assess gradient stability
• Include controls for pH changes that might affect HyPer fluorescence
• Account for potential phototoxicity during fluorescence measurements
• Use appropriate statistical methods for gradient calculations

Visualization of Key Concepts

H₂O₂ Cytotoxicity and Cellular Defense Mechanisms

CaST System for Biochemical Tagging

Effective management of H₂O₂ cytotoxicity enables safer in vivo applications, particularly in advanced research areas such as biochemical tagging of cellular activity history. The strategies outlined in this application note—including leveraging natural H₂O₂ gradients, employing potentiated toxicity approaches, and utilizing controlled-release systems—provide researchers with practical tools to harness H₂O₂'s useful properties while minimizing its damaging effects. The development of innovative systems like CaST demonstrates how precise control over H₂O₂-mediated processes can enable novel research methodologies without compromising cellular viability. As research continues, further refinement of these approaches will expand the safe application window for H₂O₂ in studying complex biological systems and developing novel therapeutic strategies.

The ability to tag and visualize proteins is fundamental to modern cell biology, enabling researchers to decipher protein localization, dynamics, and function. However, common challenges such as mislocalization, impaired protein function, and low signal-to-noise ratio can compromise experimental outcomes. This application note, framed within the broader context of biochemical tagging of cellular activity history in vivo, provides detailed protocols and strategies to overcome these hurdles. We focus on leveraging recent advancements in proximity labeling and fluorescent tagging to ensure that tags are accessible, properly expressed, and functional, thereby capturing accurate spatiotemporal biological data.

Critical Considerations for Tag Design and Selection

Selecting the appropriate tag and fusion strategy is paramount to success. The choice affects everything from protein stability and localization to the feasibility of downstream applications.

Tag Orientation and Linker Design

The placement of the tag (N-terminal vs. C-terminal) can significantly impact protein function. For instance, when studying glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)-anchored proteins, a C-terminal tag would interfere with the anchor sequence and prevent membrane association [59]. Always consult known protein domains, signal peptides, and localization sequences when deciding on tag orientation. Furthermore, incorporating flexible linkers (e.g., sequences rich in glycine and serine) between the protein of interest and the tag can reduce steric hindrance and help preserve native protein folding and activity.

Choosing the Right Tag for Your Application

Different tags offer unique advantages. The table below summarizes key performance characteristics of selected fluorescent proteins, which are critical for live-cell imaging and protein localization studies.

Table 1: Performance Characteristics of Fluorescent Protein Tags in a Cellular Context

Fluorescent Protein	Color	Relative Brightness (Live Cell)	Photostability	Performance After Fixation	Recommended Use
mNeonGreen	Green	High (Benchmark)	Moderate	Good (~50% brightness retained)	General live-cell imaging
3xmNeonGreen	Green	Very High (150% of mNeonGreen)	Moderate	Good	Detecting low-abundance proteins
tdTomato	Red	High	High	Poor (80-90% loss after formaldehyde)	Live-cell imaging only
mScarlet-I	Red	High (Monomeric)	Moderate	Excellent (60-70% brightness retained)	Live- and fixed-cell imaging
mCardinal	Far-Red	Low (but detectable)	High	Very Poor (undetectable)	Specialized live-cell applications

Data adapted from a comprehensive toolkit evaluation [59].

Advanced Tagging Systems for Functional Studies

Moving beyond simple visualization, advanced tagging systems can report on cellular activity and biomolecular interactions.

Capturing Cellular Activity History with CaST

To record historical cellular activity, such as neuronal activation, the Calcium-activated split-TurboID (CaST) system was developed. This innovative tool biochemically tags cells experiencing elevated intracellular calcium levels, a universal signaling proxy for activation [5] [45].

CaST functions as an AND-gate coincidence detector. It requires two simultaneous inputs for labeling: elevated cytosolic Ca²⁺ and the presence of exogenous biotin. The system is built from split fragments of the promiscuous biotin ligase TurboID, each fused to elements of a Ca²⁺-sensing complex: calmodulin (CaM) and a CaM-binding M13 peptide. Upon Ca²⁺ influx, CaM and M13 interact, reconstituting TurboID activity and enabling biotinylation of proximal proteins within a user-defined time window controlled by biotin delivery [5].

Diagram: Mechanism of Calcium-activated split-TurboID (CaST)

Proximity Labeling for Endogenous Interactome Mapping

For mapping protein-protein interactions and subcellular proteomes without genetic manipulation, ligand-directed and antibody-directed proximity labeling (PL) methods are groundbreaking. These strategies conjugate PL enzymes or photocatalysts to ligands (e.g., small molecules, peptides, aptamers) or antibodies that bind to endogenous proteins [60] [61].

• Ligand-Directed PL: A small-molecule ligand targeting a specific receptor (e.g., a neurotransmitter receptor) is tethered to a PL enzyme like TurboID or APEX. Upon ligand binding, the enzyme labels proteins in the immediate vicinity of the receptor, enabling the mapping of endogenous interactomes in live animals [60].
• Antibody-Directed PL: An antibody specific to a cell-surface protein is conjugated to a catalyst. This allows for the profiling of the local protein environment of native, unmodified targets, which is invaluable for studying surfaceome dynamics [60] [61].

Detailed Experimental Protocols

Protocol: Validating Tag Localization and Function

Before embarking on complex experiments, it is crucial to confirm that the tagged protein localizes correctly and remains functional.

Materials:

• Plasmid constructs (tagged protein of interest, positive/negative controls)
• Appropriate cell line
• Transfection reagent
• Culture media and supplements
• Fixative (e.g., formaldehyde)
• Permeabilization buffer (e.g., Triton X-100)
• Blocking buffer (e.g., BSA)
• Primary antibody against tag or protein
• Fluorescently-labeled secondary antibody
• Mounting medium with DAPI
• Confocal microscope

Method:

• Construct Design: Clone your protein of interest into an appropriate expression vector, ensuring the tag (e.g., mNeonGreen, HALO) is placed on the terminus least likely to disrupt function. Include flexible linkers. For organelle-specific markers, use well-characterized targeting sequences.
• Cell Culture and Transfection: Culture the chosen cell line (e.g., HEK293T, IMCD3) under standard conditions. Transfect with the constructed plasmid using a suitable method (e.g., lipofection). Include controls (e.g., untagged protein, known marker plasmids).
• Fixation and Staining: 24-48 hours post-transfection, fix cells with 4% formaldehyde for 15 minutes. Permeabilize with 0.1% Triton X-100 for 10 minutes, then block with 1-5% BSA for 1 hour.
• Immunofluorescence: Incubate with primary antibody (diluted in blocking buffer) for 1-2 hours at room temperature or overnight at 4°C. Wash thoroughly and incubate with fluorescent secondary antibody for 1 hour. Include DAPI to stain nuclei.
• Imaging and Analysis: Image using a confocal microscope. Compare the localization of your tagged protein with known organelle markers or the pattern observed for the endogenous protein (if a validated antibody exists). Quantify the degree of colocalization using Pearson's correlation coefficient.

Validation: A successful validation shows a high degree of colocalization with the expected marker and a distribution pattern consistent with the known function of the protein. Significant mislocalization or aggregation indicates the tag is interfering with protein function.

Protocol: Recording Cellular Activity with CaST

This protocol outlines the process for using CaST to label neurons activated by a stimulus in untethered, freely behaving mice [5].

Materials:

• AAV vectors encoding CaST-IRES (optimal construct)
• Sterotaxic injection apparatus
• Biotin (membrane-permeant)
• Phosphate-buffered saline (PBS)
• Stimulus of interest (e.g., psilocybin)
• Anesthetics and surgical tools
• Fixative (e.g., 4% PFA)
• Streptavidin-conjugated fluorophore (e.g., SA-647)
• Antibodies for cell-type markers (e.g., NeuN for neurons)

Method:

• Viral Delivery: Stereotactically inject AAVs expressing the CaST system into the brain region of interest (e.g., prefrontal cortex) of mice. Allow 2-4 weeks for sufficient expression.
• Activity Labeling:
  • Administer biotin (intraperitoneally or intravenously) to the animal. The exact dose and volume must be optimized.
  • Present the specific stimulus (e.g., psilocybin injection, behavioral task) during the biotin circulation window. CaST will biotinylate proteins only in cells with elevated Ca²⁺ during this period.
  • A typical labeling window is 10-30 minutes [5].
• Tissue Harvesting and Processing: After the labeling period, transcardially perfuse the animal with PBS followed by 4% PFA. Dissect the brain and post-fix in PFA overnight. Section the tissue into 20-50 µm thick slices using a vibratome.
• Signal Detection:
  • Incubate free-floating brain sections with streptavidin conjugated to Alexa Fluor 647 (SA-647) to detect biotinylated proteins.
  • Co-stain with cell-type-specific antibodies (e.g., anti-NeuN) to identify the labeled population of cells.
  • Mount sections and image via confocal microscopy.
• Data Analysis: Quantify the CaST signal (SA-647 fluorescence) and correlate it with the behavioral or pharmacological response. Compare the number of biotin-positive cells in stimulated vs. control animals.

Troubleshooting: High background can result from endogenous biotinylation. Always include control animals that express CaST but receive biotin without the stimulus. The CaST signal should be reversible and dependent on the coincidence of Ca²⁺ and biotin [5].

Diagram: Workflow for Recording Neuronal Activity with CaST

The Scientist's Toolkit: Research Reagent Solutions

A successful tagging experiment relies on a suite of reliable reagents. The table below lists key solutions for the protocols featured in this note.

Table 2: Essential Research Reagents for Tagging and Proximity Labeling

Reagent / Tool	Function / Application	Key Characteristics
pPOTv6/v7 Plasmid Series [59]	PCR-based protein tagging in trypanosomatids and other systems.	Over 100 plasmids with various fluorescent, epitope, and biochemical tags; multiple selection markers.
CaST (Ca²⁺-activated split-TurboID) [5]	Biochemical recording of cellular activity history in vivo.	Requires coincidence of Ca²⁺ and biotin; works in deep tissue without implants; rapid (10 min).
TurboID / APEX2 [60] [62]	Proximity-dependent biotinylation for interactome mapping.	TurboID: fast labeling, high activity. APEX2: smaller size, peroxidase-based, requires H₂O₂.
LOV-TurboID [60] [63]	Light-activatable proximity labeling for spatiotemporal control.	Reduced background in biotin-rich environments; enables precise temporal control via blue light.
iAPEX (in situ APEX activation) [63]	Proximity labeling with reduced background and toxicity.	Uses DAAO enzyme to locally produce H₂O₂, avoiding toxic exogenous H₂O₂ addition.
Ligand-APEX/-TurboID Conjugates [60] [61]	Mapping interactomes of endogenous, unmodified proteins.	Comprises a ligand (drug, hormone) linked to a PL enzyme; binds and labels native targets.

Optimizing tag accessibility and expression is a critical, multi-faceted process. By carefully selecting tags based on quantitative performance data, employing rational construct design, and leveraging next-generation activity-dependent tagging systems like CaST, researchers can overcome common challenges of mislocalization and dysfunction. The detailed protocols provided here for validation and application offer a pathway to generate robust, high-quality data, ultimately advancing our ability to capture and understand the complex history of cellular activity in its native in vivo context.

Biotinylation is a cornerstone technique in modern biochemical research, enabling the precise tagging and isolation of proteins and other biomolecules to study cellular activity history in vivo. The power of this method lies in the exceptionally strong and specific interaction between biotin and streptavidin, which facilitates the detection and purification of biotin-labeled molecules from complex biological mixtures. For researchers investigating dynamic cellular processes, spatial protein organization, and in vivo protein interactions, achieving efficient biotinylation is paramount. The efficacy of this process is highly dependent on several critical parameters: buffer composition, reaction duration, and temperature. Optimization of these factors is essential to maximize labeling efficiency while maintaining biological activity, particularly in sensitive live-cell or in vivo systems. This protocol details evidence-based strategies for ensuring efficient biotinylation, framed within the context of mapping cellular activity history for drug discovery and basic research applications.

Fundamental Principles of Biotinylation

Biotinylation involves the covalent attachment of biotin to target molecules, primarily proteins, through chemical or enzymatic means. The biotin-avidin interaction represents one of the strongest non-covalent bonds in nature (K~a~=10¹⁵ M⁻¹), characterized by rapid bond formation and remarkable stability across extreme pH, temperature, and denaturing conditions [64]. This robustness makes it invaluable for purification and detection applications, including affinity capture, western blotting, and immunohistochemistry.

Biotinylation reagents share common structural features: a reactive group that couples to specific amino acid functional groups, a spacer arm of variable length, and the biotin molecule itself. The reactive group determines specificity toward particular amino acids (e.g., primary amines, sulfhydryls), while the spacer arm length influences biotin accessibility for avidin binding, with longer spacers typically reducing steric hindrance [64]. Strategic selection of these reagents based on the experimental goals—whether for cell surface labeling, intracellular protein tagging, or proximity-dependent biotinylation—forms the foundation for successful experimental outcomes in tracking cellular history.

Optimized Biotinylation Protocols

Proximity-Dependent Biotinylation Using TurboID

Proximity-dependent biotinylation techniques, such as TurboID, have revolutionized the study of protein-protein interactions and cellular microenvironments in living cells. These methods utilize engineered biotin ligases fused to proteins of interest to label neighboring proteins with biotin.

Workflow Overview:

Diagram: TurboID-based proximity labeling workflow for mapping protein interactions.

Detailed Protocol:

• Expression System Setup: Express your protein of interest as a fusion with TurboID using an appropriate vector system. For in vivo studies, consider cell-type specific promoters or inducible systems to control temporal expression [65] [66].
• Biotin Administration: Add biotin to the system at a concentration of 50-500 µM. The optimal concentration should be determined empirically for each experimental system [65].
• Incubation Conditions: Incubate for 15 minutes to several hours depending on the TurboID variant and experimental requirements. TurboID enables rapid labeling (as short as 10 minutes) due to its enhanced catalytic efficiency compared to earlier generations [66].
• Termination: Remove excess biotin by washing cells with cold phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) containing glycine (100 mM) to quench unreacted biotinylation reagent [67].
• Cell Lysis: Lyse cells in RIPA buffer (or appropriate lysis buffer) supplemented with protease inhibitors (e.g., complete ULTRA) and phosphatase inhibitors (e.g., PhosSTOP) [67].
• Affinity Capture: Incubate lysates with streptavidin-conjugated beads for 2 hours at 4°C with gentle agitation [67]. Use stringent washing conditions (e.g., with 2 M urea) to reduce non-specific binding [65].
• On-Bead Digestion: Digest captured proteins directly on beads using trypsin (MS grade) for LC-MS/MS analysis [65] [66].

Critical Optimization Parameters:

• Reaction Time: TurboID enables rapid labeling from 10 minutes to several hours. Shorter incubation times minimize non-specific background while longer incubations enhance signal intensity [66].
• Temperature: Perform biotinylation at physiological temperature (37°C for mammalian cells) when possible, though labeling can occur effectively at lower temperatures with extended incubation [66].
• Biotin Concentration: Typical working concentrations range from 50-500 µM. Higher concentrations may increase labeling efficiency but could potentially enhance non-specific background [65].

Antibody-Based Proximity Biotinylation (BAR)

Biotinylation by Antibody Recognition (BAR) represents an innovative approach that leverages antibody recognition rather than genetic fusion for proximity-dependent labeling, making it suitable for studying endogenous proteins without genetic manipulation.

Detailed Protocol:

• Cell Preparation: Culture cells (e.g., MCF7) on appropriate surfaces to reach 70-80% confluence. Include controls omitting primary antibody or using cells with silenced target protein expression [68].
• Labeling Buffer Preparation: Prepare fresh BAR labeling buffer containing 0.14 mM biotin-phenol and 0.03% hydrogen peroxide in PBST immediately before use [68].
• Antibody Incubation: Incubate cells with primary antibody (e.g., anti-estrogen receptor antibody at 1:200 dilution) for 1 hour, followed by HRP-conjugated secondary antibody (1:2,000 dilution) for 45-60 minutes [68].
• Biotinylation Reaction: Add BAR labeling buffer and incubate for 1 minute at room temperature [68].
• Reaction Termination: Quench the reaction by adding sodium ascorbate (0.5 M in PBST) to a final concentration of 5 mM [68].
• Cell Lysis and Protein Capture: Lyse cells in SDS-containing buffer (2% SDS in PBST), then proceed with streptavidin-based purification as described in section 2.1 [68].

Cell Surface Protein Biotinylation

Isolating cell surface proteins provides crucial information about receptors, transporters, and other membrane proteins that mediate cellular communication and history.

Detailed Protocol:

• Cell Preparation: Plate cells (e.g., neural stem cells) at 750,000 cells/well in 6-well plates and culture for 48 hours prior to biotinylation [67].
• Washing: Wash cells three times with cold PBS+/+ (containing 0.1 mM Ca²⁺ and 1 mM Mg²⁺) at 4°C for 5 minutes each to preserve membrane integrity [67].
• Biotin Labeling: Incubate cells with 1 mg/mL EZ-Link Sulfo-NHS-SS-Biotin in cold PBS+/+ for 30 minutes at 4°C [67]. The sulfo-NHS ester group targets primary amines (lysine residues), while the hydrophilic sulfonate group prevents membrane permeabilization, restricting labeling to surface proteins.
• Quenching: Remove biotin solution and incubate with 100 mM glycine in PBS+/+ for 30 minutes to quench non-reacted biotin [67].
• Lysis and Purification: Lyse cells, clarify lysates by centrifugation, and incubate with pre-equilibrated streptavidin columns for 2 hours at 4°C [67].
• Elution: Elute biotinylated proteins using SDS-PAGE loading buffer containing 100-200 mM DTT or 5% β-mercaptoethanol, which cleaves the disulfide bond in NHS-SS-Biotin [67].

Quantitative Optimization Data

Table 1: Optimization of elution conditions for biotinylated protein recovery and streptavidin contamination [66]

Elution Temperature	Protein Recovery	Streptavidin Contamination	Recommended Application
50°C	~25%	Minimal	When minimizing streptavidin interference is critical
75°C	~50%	Moderate	Optimal balance for most proteomic studies
95°C	~90%	High	Maximum protein recovery when purity is less critical

Table 2: Comparison of biotinylation enrichment methods [66]

Enrichment Method	Precipitation Efficiency	Advantages	Limitations
Streptavidin-agarose (Str)	High	Complete depletion of biotinylated proteins	High streptavidin peptide background in MS
Anti-biotin antibodies (DMP-)	Moderate	Reduced streptavidin background	Lower precipitation efficiency
Anti-biotin antibodies (DMP+)	Moderate	Antibody removed from eluate	Potential antibody inactivation during cross-linking
Protease-resistant streptavidin (prS)	High	Minimal streptavidin background (14.7% vs 87.9%)	Requires chemical modification

Table 3: Biotinylation efficiency across different TurboID fusion constructs [65]

TurboID Construct	Biotinylated/Unbiotinylated Peptides	Biotinylated/Unbiotinylated Proteins	Biotinylation Efficiency
Control (no TurboID)	1/1722	0/211	0.06%
cyto-TurboID	4/2356	4/232	0.17%
ER-TurboID	118/3882	43/360	11.94%
Mem-TurboID	86/3658	31/261	11.88%

Advanced Technical Considerations

Buffer Composition and Optimization

The buffer environment critically influences biotinylation efficiency through multiple mechanisms:

pH Considerations: NHS ester-based biotinylation reagents target primary amines (ε-amino group of lysine residues), which must be unprotonated for efficient reaction. Optimal pH ranges between 7.0-9.0, with pH 7.5-8.5 being most common for physiological compatibility. Above pH 9.0, protein denaturation may occur, while below pH 7.0, labeling efficiency decreases significantly due to amine protonation [64].

Salt and Additive Effects: PBS is the most common buffer for cell surface biotinylation due to its physiological compatibility. For intracellular biotinylation, various lysis buffers may be employed, with RIPA buffer being common. Include protease and phosphatase inhibitors to maintain protein integrity during processing. Urea (2 M) in wash buffers can reduce non-specific binding during affinity purification [65] [67].

Quenching Solutions: After biotinylation, unreacted esters must be quenched to prevent non-specific labeling. Glycine (100 mM) or Tris buffers are effective quenching agents that scavenge unreacted biotinylation reagent [67].

Temperature and Time Optimization

The relationship between temperature, time, and biotinylation efficiency follows reaction kinetics principles:

Temperature Effects: Higher temperatures generally increase reaction rates but may compromise protein structure or cell viability. For live-cell applications, 37°C is standard, while 4°C is preferred for cell surface labeling to prevent internalization. For in vitro biotinylation of purified proteins, room temperature or 37°C for 30 minutes to 2 hours is typical [67] [66].

Time Course Optimization: Biotinylation duration should be optimized empirically. TurboID enables rapid labeling (as short as 10 minutes), while traditional NHS ester-based biotinylation typically requires 30-60 minutes. Extended incubation beyond 2 hours may increase non-specific labeling without significantly enhancing specific signal [67] [66].

Elution Temperature Effects: As demonstrated in Table 1, elution temperature significantly impacts both protein recovery and streptavidin contamination in downstream MS analysis. A balanced approach (75°C) typically provides optimal results [66].

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Reagents and Materials

Table 4: Key research reagent solutions for efficient biotinylation

Reagent/Material	Function	Example Products
Sulfo-NHS-SS-Biotin	Cell-surface protein labeling; cleavable disulfide bridge enables efficient elution	Thermo Scientific EZ-Link Sulfo-NHS-SS-Biotin [67]
Biotin phenol	Substrate for HRP-mediated biotinylation in BAR and APEX techniques	Iris Biotech LS-3500 [68]
Streptavidin magnetic beads	Affinity capture of biotinylated proteins	Thermo Scientific Pierce Streptavidin Magnetic Beads [68]
Protease-resistant streptavidin (prS)	Reduced streptavidin background in MS analysis	Chemically modified streptavidin [66]
Biotin ligase variants	Enzymatic biotinylation (TurboID for rapid labeling)	TurboID, BioID, APEX2 [65] [66]
HRP-conjugated antibodies	Enable antibody-based proximity biotinylation (BAR)	Various commercial sources [68]
Biotinylation quenching solution	Terminates biotinylation reaction	Glycine (100 mM) [67]

Visualization of Biotinylation Strategy Selection

Diagram: Decision pathway for selecting appropriate biotinylation strategy based on research goals.

Analytical Validation and Troubleshooting

Minimizing False Positives in Proteomic Analysis

A significant challenge in biotinylation-based proteomics is distinguishing true biotinylated peptides from non-specific background. Recent advances advocate for direct analysis of biotinylated peptides rather than relying solely on statistical comparisons:

Direct Biotinylation Analysis: Incorporate a dynamic modification parameter for biotinylation (+226.078 Da) on lysine side chains during MS data analysis to specifically identify biotinylated peptides [65]. This approach significantly reduces false positives compared to conventional statistical methods that often inadvertently exclude true biotinylated proteins due to stringent cutoff thresholds [65].

Control Experiments: Always include appropriate negative controls such as:

• Cells without TurboID expression
• Samples without primary antibody in BAR experiments
• Streptavidin-only controls for non-specific binding assessment [68]

Enrichment Method Selection: As highlighted in Table 2, protease-resistant streptavidin (prS) dramatically reduces streptavidin-derived peptides in mass spectrometry analysis (14.7% vs 87.9% with regular streptavidin) while maintaining high precipitation efficiency [66].

Troubleshooting Common Issues

Low Biotinylation Efficiency:

• Verify biotin reagent activity and concentration
• Confirm proper pH (7.5-8.5 for amine-reactive chemistry)
• Ensure adequate reaction time and temperature
• For enzymatic systems, verify enzyme activity and co-factor availability

High Background Signal:

• Increase stringency of wash conditions (e.g., include 2 M urea)
• Optimize biotin concentration to minimize non-specific labeling
• Use cleavable biotin reagents for more efficient elution
• Implement protease-resistant streptavidin to reduce MS background

Incomplete Elution:

• Ensure reducing agent is fresh and at proper concentration for disulfide-cleavable biotin
• Consider temperature optimization as shown in Table 1
• Evaluate alternative elution conditions (e.g., biotin competition)

Efficient biotinylation requires meticulous optimization of buffer conditions, reaction time, and temperature parameters tailored to specific experimental goals. The protocols and data presented here provide a framework for researchers to implement robust biotinylation strategies that maximize signal-to-noise ratio while maintaining biological relevance. By selecting appropriate biotinylation methods, optimizing enrichment conditions, and implementing rigorous analytical validation, scientists can effectively capture and interrogate cellular activity history through precise molecular tagging. As biotinylation technologies continue to evolve, particularly in live-cell and in vivo applications, these foundational principles will remain essential for generating high-quality data in both basic research and drug development contexts.

Proximity labeling technologies represent a powerful toolset in modern biochemical research, enabling the unbiased mapping of molecular interactions and subcellular proteomes at high spatial and temporal resolution. Among these, ascorbate peroxidase (APEX)-based methods have gained prominence for their rapid labeling kinetics and compatibility with electron microscopy. However, the conventional APEX methodology faces two significant limitations that constrain its application: the toxicity of its essential substrate, hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂), and considerable non-specific background labeling from endogenous peroxidases that becomes particularly problematic in challenging cell types and in vivo systems [43] [69].

The novel in situ APEX activation (iAPEX) system overcomes these barriers by re-engineering the substrate delivery mechanism. Instead of adding high concentrations of H₂O₂ directly to the cellular environment, iAPEX employs an enzymatic cascade that locally generates the necessary H₂O₂. This is achieved by combining APEX2 with a D-amino acid oxidase (DAAO) from Rhodotorula gracilis [43]. When the DAAO substrate, a D-amino acid such as D-alanine, is provided, the oxidase produces H₂O₂ in situ, which is then immediately utilized by nearby APEX2 for proximity labeling. This elegant solution minimizes cellular toxicity and drastically reduces off-target background, expanding the potential of proximity labeling to previously inaccessible biological contexts, including primary cilia proteomics in diverse cell lines and proof-of-concept applications in Xenopus laevis [43].

Core Mechanism and System Components

The iAPEX Enzymatic Cascade

The iAPEX system functions as a two-component enzymatic relay that confines the production and consumption of H₂O₂ to a precise subcellular location. The mechanism is elegantly simple: a D-amino acid oxidase (DAAO) is targeted to the same organelle or cellular microdomain as APEX2. Upon the addition of a D-amino acid (e.g., D-alanine), DAAO catalyzes its oxidation, concomitantly generating H₂O₂ as a byproduct. This locally produced H₂O₂ is then harnessed by the adjacent APEX2 enzyme, which uses it to oxidize biotin-phenol or biotin-tyramide. The resulting phenoxyl radical rapidly biotinylates proximal endogenous proteins (within a ~20 nm radius), allowing for their subsequent isolation and identification via streptavidin-affinity purification and mass spectrometry [43].

This localized cascade is crucial for specificity. Experiments demonstrated that cytosolic expression of DAAO (cyto-DAAO) failed to activate cilia-localized APEX2, indicating that H₂O₂ produced in the cytoplasm does not significantly diffuse into the primary cilium, likely due to rapid detoxification by cellular antioxidants. This spatial coupling ensures that labeling is exclusively confined to the compartment where both enzymes are present [43].

Research Reagent Solutions

The successful implementation of the iAPEX system relies on a defined set of molecular tools and reagents. The table below catalogues the essential components.

Table 1: Key Research Reagents for iAPEX Experiments

Reagent / Component	Function / Role in iAPEX	Key Details & Examples
APEX2 Enzyme	Proximity labeling peroxidase	Catalyzes the H₂O₂-dependent oxidation of biotin-phenol to biotinylate nearby proteins [43].
D-amino Acid Oxidase (DAAO)	In situ H₂O₂ generation	From Rhodotorula gracilis; oxidizes D-amino acids to produce H₂O₂ locally [43].
Targeting Sequences	Subcellular localization	Fused to APEX2 and DAAO to direct them to specific compartments (e.g., NPHP3₁₋₂₀₀ for primary cilia) [43].
D-Amino Acids (Substrates)	Activate the enzymatic cascade	D-alanine, D-serine, etc.; serve as the precursor for localized H₂O₂ production by DAAO [43].
Biotin-Phenol / Biotin-Tyramide	Proximity labeling substrate	Aromatic molecule that, when oxidized by APEX2, forms a short-lived radical that tags proximate proteins with biotin [43] [70].
Streptavidin Beads	Affinity purification	Used to isolate and purify biotinylated proteins after the labeling reaction for downstream proteomic analysis [43] [70].

Diagram 1: The iAPEX enzymatic cascade for localized proximity labeling.

Quantitative Performance and Comparative Advantages

Systematic Comparison: iAPEX vs. Conventional APEX

The iAPEX system was rigorously tested against the conventional APEX method across multiple cell lines, including IMCD3, C2C12 myoblasts, 3T3-L1 pre-adipocytes, and NIH/3T3 fibroblasts. The quantitative and qualitative outcomes highlight iAPEX's superior performance in challenging models [43].

Table 2: Quantitative and Qualitative Comparison: Conventional APEX vs. iAPEX

Parameter	Conventional APEX	iAPEX System
H₂O₂ Application	Direct addition (mM concentration) [43]	Enzymatic generation in situ via DAAO + D-Ala [43]
Cellular Toxicity	High (induces oxidative damage) [43]	Minimal [43]
Background Labeling	Significant in many cell lines (e.g., NIH/3T3) due to endogenous peroxidases [43]	Greatly reduced; specific to compartments expressing both enzymes [43]
Specificity Control Complexity	High (requires mislocalized APEX, genetic ablation) [43]	Simplified (built-in dependency on two enzymes) [43]
Applicability to Challenging Cell Lines	Limited (e.g., high background in NIH/3T3) [43]	Broadly applicable (effective in C2C12, 3T3-L1, NIH/3T3) [43]
Spatial Resolution	~20 nm labeling radius [43]	Maintains high resolution, confined to dual-enzyme sites [43]
In Vivo Potential	Limited by H₂O₂ toxicity [43]	Demonstrated proof-of-concept in Xenopus laevis [43]

Experimental Validation in Primary Cilia and Other Organelles

The power of iAPEX was demonstrated by profiling the proteome of the primary cilium, a minute cellular microdomain that is notoriously difficult to study with conventional biochemical methods. In cell lines like NIH/3T3 where traditional APEX produced overwhelming non-specific biotinylation, iAPEX enabled clean and specific labeling of the ciliary compartment [43]. This led to the identification of both known and novel ciliary proteins, suggesting heterogeneity in cilia proteomes across different cell types [43].

Furthermore, the versatility of iAPEX was confirmed by its successful application to other organelles, including mitochondria and lipid droplets. The system provided organelle-specific protein labeling with high spatial resolution, showcasing its potential to probe dynamic protein interactions even at membrane-contact sites [43].

Detailed Experimental Protocol

Workflow for iAPEX-based Proximity Proteomics

The following section provides a detailed step-by-step protocol for conducting an iAPEX proximity labeling experiment, from cell preparation to proteomic sample preparation.

Diagram 2: The core iAPEX experimental workflow for proteomic profiling.

Step-by-Step Procedure

• Cell Line Generation:

  • Generate a stable cell line expressing both organelle-targeted APEX2 (e.g., NPHP3₁₋₂₀₀-GFP-APEX2 for primary cilia) and organelle-targeted DAAO (e.g., NPHP3₁₋₂₀₀-DAAO-FLAG). Use an appropriate transfection method (e.g., lentiviral transduction) followed by antibiotic selection to create a stable pool or isolate single clones [43].

• Cell Culture and Preparation:

  • Culture the engineered cells under standard conditions appropriate for the cell type. For primary cilia studies, plate cells on appropriate dishes and induce ciliogenesis by serum starvation for 24-48 hours once cells reach 100% confluence [43].

• iAPEX Labeling Reaction:

  • Pre-incubation: Prepare a working solution of Biotin-Tyramide (BT) in the pre-warmed cell culture medium. Replace the medium on cells with the BT-containing medium. Incubate for 30-60 minutes to allow for BT penetration [43].
  • Activation: To initiate the enzymatic cascade, add the DAAO substrate, D-alanine, to the culture medium at a final concentration of 5-10 mM. Gently swirl the dish to mix. Incubate for exactly 1 minute to allow for H₂O₂ generation and subsequent protein biotinylation [43].
  • Quenching: Quickly remove the labeling medium and wash the cells twice with a quenching solution containing scavengers for reactive oxygen species (e.g., Trolox, sodium ascorbate) in DPBS or the appropriate buffer. This step is critical to stop the labeling reaction [43].

• Cell Lysis and Protein Extraction:

  • Immediately after quenching, lyse the cells on ice using a robust RIPA lysis buffer (e.g., 50 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 1% NP-40, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate, 0.1% SDS) supplemented with protease inhibitors and the quenching agents. Scrape the dishes and transfer the lysate to microcentrifuge tubes.
  • Sonicate the lysates briefly to shear DNA and reduce viscosity. Clarify the lysates by centrifugation at 16,000 × g for 15 minutes at 4°C. Transfer the supernatant to a new tube [43].

• Affinity Purification and On-bead Digestion:

  • Streptavidin Capture: Incubate the clarified lysates with pre-washed streptavidin-agarose beads for 90 minutes at 4°C with end-over-end rotation [43] [70].
  • Stringent Washing: Pellet the beads and subject them to a series of stringent washes:
    1. Once with ice-cold lysis buffer.
    2. Once with 1 M KCl.
    3. Once with 0.1 M Na₂CO₃.
    4. Once with 2 M urea in 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0).
    5. Twice with SDS-free RIPA buffer [43] [70].
  • On-bead Digestion: After a final wash with 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), resuspend the beads in the same buffer containing 2 mM CaCl₂ and trypsin (1 µg/µL). Incubate overnight at 37°C with shaking to digest the captured biotinylated proteins [43].

• Mass Spectrometry Preparation:

  • The following day, acidify the peptide-containing supernatant with trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) to a final concentration of 1%. Desalt the peptides using C18 StageTips or similar solid-phase extraction tips. The peptides are now ready for LC-MS/MS analysis to identify the proximity-labeled proteome [43].

Application in Broader Research Context

The development of the iAPEX system holds significant implications for the broader field of biochemical tagging in in vivo research. By mitigating the primary roadblocks of toxicity and background, iAPEX opens new avenues for mapping proteomes and interactomes in more physiologically relevant models.

Its successful application in Xenopus laevis provides a crucial proof-of-concept for future studies in complex organisms [43]. This aligns with the growing demand in drug development for tools that can accurately capture cellular activity history and protein network dynamics within a native in vivo environment, ultimately leading to better target identification and validation. The system's modularity allows it to be adapted to study specialized mitochondrial subpopulations [70], membrane contact sites, and other dynamic micro-compartments that are central to cellular function and dysfunction in disease. As the field moves towards more sophisticated in vivo models, engineered systems like iAPEX, which offer genetic targeting, temporal control, and reduced toxicity, will become indispensable for generating high-fidelity spatial proteomic maps.

Validation and Comparative Analysis: Choosing the Right Tagging Technology

The ability to record cellular activity history in vivo is fundamental to understanding biological processes in neuroscience and drug development. This application note provides a comparative benchmark of two primary approaches for tagging activated cells: the novel calcium-activated split-TurboID (CaST) system and traditional transcriptional reporters. We detail quantitative data demonstrating CaST's superior temporal resolution, capable of labeling activated cells within 10 minutes, compared to the 6-18 hours required by transcriptional reporters. Additionally, we present standardized protocols for implementing both systems, including reagent specifications and visualization of signaling pathways. This resource equips researchers with the necessary framework to select appropriate cellular tagging methodologies based on the temporal sensitivity requirements of their specific experimental designs in vivo.

Recording the history of cellular activity in vivo is crucial for deciphering how cells respond to stimuli, drugs, and disease states. A fundamental challenge lies in capturing these activation events with high sensitivity and temporal precision, especially in deep tissues of freely behaving animals. This application note, framed within the broader thesis of advancing biochemical tagging for cellular activity history, benchmarks two distinct technological approaches: a novel enzymatic method (CaST) and established transcriptional reporter systems.

Transcriptional Reporters, such as those based on immediate early genes (IEGs) like Fos, have been widely used for decades. These tools rely on the activation of gene expression pathways, where a cellular stimulus triggers transcription and translation of a reporter protein. While powerful, this process is inherently slow, requiring hours to produce a detectable signal, and may not be universally applicable across all cell types [5].

In contrast, Ca²⁺-Activated Split-TurboID (CaST) represents a paradigm shift. It engineers an enzyme to function as a coincidence detector of elevated intracellular calcium (a universal proxy for activation, especially in neurons) and the presence of an exogenously delivered biotin molecule. This system bypasses the transcriptional and translational machinery, enabling rapid biochemical tagging of activated cells [5] [7].

This document provides a direct, quantitative comparison of the sensitivity and temporal resolution of these systems, followed by detailed protocols to guide researchers in their application for in vivo studies.

Performance Benchmarking

The core performance differentiators between CaST and transcriptional reporters lie in their temporal resolution and operational mechanism. The quantitative comparisons below are derived from controlled experiments in model systems.

Table 1: Key Performance Metrics for CaST and Transcriptional Reporters

Performance Metric	CaST (Ca²⁺-Activated Split-TurboID)	Transcriptional Reporters (e.g., FLARE, Cal-Light, IEG-based)
Minimum Tagging Time	~10 minutes [5]	6 - 18 hours [5]
Activation Signal	Intracellular Ca²⁺ elevation	Intracellular Ca²⁺ elevation or IEG expression
Tagging Mechanism	Enzyme-catalyzed protein biotinylation	Transcriptional activation of a reporter gene (e.g., GFP)
Key Requirement	Coincidence of high Ca²⁺ and exogenous biotin	Coincidence of high Ca²⁺ and light (for some) or drug administration
Signal Readout	Streptavidin-based detection of biotinylated proteins	Fluorescence imaging of reporter protein
Primary Advantage	Rapid, non-invasive, biochemical tagging in deep tissue	Stable, long-term genetic labeling

The difference in temporal resolution is not merely incremental but fundamental. CaST's enzymatic activity allows it to function on a timescale of minutes, integrating Ca²⁺ activity during a brief, user-defined window of biotin delivery. Its reversibility ensures that only neurons active during this specific window are tagged [5]. Transcriptional reporters, however, are gated by the slow processes of gene expression, making them unsuitable for capturing rapid, transient activation patterns or for immediate readouts after an experimental manipulation.

Table 2: Benchmarking Against Other Dynamic Reporting Systems

System	Temporal Resolution	Spatial Context	Key Application
CaST [5]	Minutes	Preserved (in situ biotinylation)	Rapid neuronal activity history
TEMPOmap [71]	Hours (RNA kinetics)	Subcellular 3D resolution	RNA life cycle (transcription, export, degradation)
Destabilized FPs [72]	Hours (Protein half-life ~2h)	Preserved (imaging)	Dynamic gene expression reporting
Metabolic RNA Labeling [73]	Hours (RNA synthesis)	Lost (single-cell sequencing)	Genome-wide RNA kinetics in cell populations

Experimental Protocols

Protocol for CaST-Based Activity Tagging

This protocol outlines the steps for using the CaST-IRES system to tag activated cells in vivo, optimized for neuronal studies.

A. Reagent Preparation

• CaST-IRES AAV: Recombinant adeno-associated virus encoding the CaST-IRES construct.
• Biotin Solution: 10-50 mM biotin in sterile PBS or saline, filter-sterilized.
• Anesthesia and Stereotaxic Surgery Supplies.

B. Experimental Workflow

• Viral Delivery: Stereotactically inject CaST-IRES AAV into the target brain region (e.g., prefrontal cortex) of the model organism (e.g., mouse). Allow 2-4 weeks for robust expression.
• Activity Labeling:
  • Administer the stimulus (e.g., psilocybin, sensory cue) to the freely behaving animal.
  • Simultaneously or immediately after stimulus onset, systemically inject the biotin solution (e.g., intraperitoneally). The labeling window can be as short as 10 minutes.
• Tissue Processing and Readout:
  • Perfuse and fix the animal. The readout can be performed immediately after labeling.
  • Process brain tissues for immunohistochemistry.
  • Incubate sections with fluorescently conjugated Streptavidin (e.g., SA-647) to detect biotinylated proteins.
  • Image using confocal or light-sheet microscopy.

Protocol for Transcriptional Reporter-Based Activity Tagging

This protocol describes the use of light-gated transcriptional reporters (e.g., Cal-Light) for activity-dependent labeling.

A. Reagent Preparation

• Reporter AAV: Recombinant AAV encoding the Cal-Light system.
• Fiber Implant/Optogenetics Setup: For delivering blue light to the target brain region.

B. Experimental Workflow

• Viral Delivery and Implant Surgery: Co-inject AAVs for the transcriptional reporter and perform a craniotomy to implant an optical fiber or cannula above the target region.
• Activity Labeling:
  • Administer the stimulus to the animal.
  • During the stimulus presentation, deliver pulses of blue light (e.g., 473 nm) through the implant to activate the light-gated system.
• Signal Development and Readout:
  • Allow 6-18 hours for the transcription and translation of the reporter protein (e.g., GFP) to reach detectable levels.
  • Perfuse, fix, and section the brain tissue.
  • Image the reporter signal directly or via immunofluorescence against the reporter protein.

The Scientist's Toolkit: Research Reagent Solutions

Table 3: Essential Reagents for Biochemical Tagging of Cellular Activity

Reagent / Tool	Function / Description	Example Use Case
CaST-IRES Plasmid/AAV	A bi-cistronic vector ensuring co-expression of both CaST fragments from a single promoter for optimal performance.	Stable, efficient expression of the CaST system in target neurons in vivo.
Biotin (Cell-Permeable)	The small molecule substrate for TurboID. It is incorporated into activated cells and attached to nearby proteins.	The "tag" that is deposited during cellular activation for later histological detection.
Streptavidin-Conjugated Fluorophores	High-affinity probes used to visualize the biotin signal in fixed tissues.	Detecting and imaging cells that were active during the biotin labeling window.
Transcriptional Reporter Systems (e.g., Cal-Light)	Genetically encoded tools where a Ca²⁺/light-coincidence detector drives expression of a fluorescent reporter protein.	For experiments requiring permanent, genetic labeling of active cells, with light-gating.
4-Thiouridine (4sU) / 5-EU	Nucleoside analogs incorporated into newly synthesized RNA, used for metabolic labeling of transcriptional activity.	Studying RNA synthesis and degradation dynamics in bulk or single-cell RNA-seq [71] [73].
Destabilized Fluorescent Proteins (dFPs)	Engineered FPs with shortened half-lives (e.g., ~2 hours) due to fused degradation domains (PEST sequences).	Creating transcriptional reporters that more accurately reflect dynamic gene expression patterns [72].

The choice between CaST and transcriptional reporters for in vivo cellular activity tagging is fundamentally a trade-off between speed and permanence. CaST offers an unprecedented ability to capture cellular activity on a timescale of minutes with immediate readout capabilities, making it ideal for studying rapid behavioral or pharmacological responses and for applications in deep tissue where light delivery is challenging. Transcriptional reporters provide a stable, genetic record of activation suitable for long-term fate mapping or manipulation of activated cell populations. This benchmarking and the accompanying protocols provide a framework for researchers to make an informed decision, driving forward the field of cellular activity history research and its applications in drug discovery and development.

Proximity labeling (PL) has emerged as a transformative technique for mapping molecular interactions in living systems, bridging molecular and cellular neuroscience by enabling the study of neural circuits and the molecular basis of behavior [51]. Techniques such as BioID, APEX, and TurboID allow for the covalent tagging of proximal proteins within a defined radius of a protein of interest, facilitating the capture of transient and spatial proteomic information under near-physiological conditions [51] [62]. However, the utility of these methods is critically dependent on robust validation and specificity controls. Without them, artifacts from background labeling, endogenous biotinylation, or non-specific interactions can compromise data interpretation. This is especially true in the context of biochemical tagging of cellular activity history in vivo, where tools like Ca²⁺-activated split-TurboID (CaST) are used to record neuronal activation patterns on rapid timescales [5] [45]. This document outlines best practices for validating proximity labeling datasets, providing application notes and protocols tailored for researchers, scientists, and drug development professionals.

Fundamentals of Proximity Labeling and Specificity Challenges

Proximity labeling employs engineered enzymes, such as biotin ligases (e.g., BioID, TurboID) or peroxidases (e.g., APEX2), which are fused to a protein of interest (POI). These enzymes generate reactive biotin species that covalently tag nearby endogenous proteins [51]. The biotinylated proteins are subsequently purified via streptavidin beads and identified by mass spectrometry.

Key challenges that necessitate stringent controls include:

• Background Labeling: Elevated catalytic activity in enzymes like TurboID can cause unintended over-labeling, increasing background noise [51].
• Endogenous Biotinylation: Proteins such as mitochondrial carboxylases are naturally biotinylated and can be co-purified, generating false positives [51].
• Diffusion of Reactive Species: Activated biotin-phenol radicals or biotin-AMP can diffuse from the enzyme active site, labeling proteins outside the intended microenvironment [74].
• Cellular Stress: The reagents required for labeling, such as hydrogen peroxide for APEX2, can induce oxidative stress and cytotoxicity, potentially perturbing the native biological state [51].

Core Strategies for Specificity Control

Experimental Design Controls

The foundation of a valid PL experiment is the inclusion of appropriate control samples to distinguish specific interactors from background.

• Negative Controls: The most critical control is the expression of the PL enzyme (e.g., TurboID, APEX2) alone or fused to a non-interacting, inert protein in the same cellular compartment. The labeled proteome from this control is compared to that of the POI-fused enzyme [51].
• Spatial Controls: For compartment-specific studies, using a localization-matched control construct (e.g., a mitochondrial outer membrane protein when studying a different outer membrane POI) helps account for regional variations in background [51].
• Temporal Controls: For dynamic processes, such as recording cellular activity with CaST, which labels neurons upon Ca²⁺ influx, it is essential to include controls without the activating stimulus (e.g., no psilocybin injection) or without the co-factor (e.g., no exogenous biotin delivery) [5].

Technical and Analytical Optimization

Optimizing labeling conditions and analytical methods is paramount for enhancing signal-to-noise ratio.

• Peptide-Level Enrichment: Moving from conventional protein-level enrichment to peptide-level enrichment allows direct identification of the biotinylated lysine residues. This provides strong evidence that a protein was genuinely labeled in situ, reduces co-purification of indirect binders, and helps eliminate false positives without relying solely on statistical fold-change calculations [51].
• Genetic Depletion of Endogenous Biotin: In model organisms like C. elegans, major endogenous biotinylated carboxylases can be genetically tagged (e.g., with a His-tag) for selective removal post-lysis, dramatically reducing this source of background [51].
• Modulating Labeling Radius: For applications requiring cellular-scale labeling, such as mapping tissue organization with QMID, tuning the properties of the reactive species is key. Using a derivative like gFMeQM-biotin, which incorporates a methyl group to extend the half-life of the quinone methide electrophile, can optimize the labeling radius to match cellular dimensions while maintaining specificity [75].

Table 1: Key Negative Controls for Different Proximity Labeling Applications

Application	Recommended Negative Control	Key Purpose
Static Protein Complexes	PL enzyme alone (cytosolic) or fused to an inert scaffold protein.	Identify proteins that bind non-specifically to the enzyme.
Activity-Dependent Labeling (e.g., CaST)	Omit activating stimulus (e.g., Ca²⁺ ionophore) or deliver biotin without stimulus.	Confirm labeling is dependent on the physiological trigger [5].
RNA-Protein Interactions (e.g., HyPro)	Use a scrambled or non-targeting antisense oligonucleotide.	Verify that protein labeling is specific to the RNA target of interest [74].
Cell-Cell Interactions (e.g., QMID)	Prey cells incubated without bait cells displaying the activating enzyme.	Distance-specific labeling from non-specific background [75].

Detailed Experimental Protocols

Protocol 1: Validating a TurboID Fusion Construct in Cultured Neurons

This protocol outlines steps to express, label, and validate the proteome of a TurboID-fused synaptic protein.

A. Reagent Preparation

• TurboID fusion construct (POI-TurboID) and control construct (TurboID-only).
• Culture media with and without 500 µM biotin.
• Lysis buffer: 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 150 mM NaCl, 1% SDS, supplemented with protease inhibitors.
• Streptavidin-coated magnetic beads.
• High-sensitivity streptavidin-HRP for western blot.

B. Experimental Procedure

• Transfection: Transfect cultured neurons with POI-TurboID and TurboID-only plasmids using a method suitable for primary cells (e.g., calcium phosphate, lipofection).
• Biotin Labeling: At 48-72 hours post-transfection, add 500 µM biotin to the culture media. Include a no-biotin control for both constructs. Incubate for 30 minutes at 37°C.
• Cell Lysis: Aspirate media, wash cells twice with cold PBS, and lyse cells in lysis buffer. Sonicate lysates to reduce viscosity and clarify by centrifugation.
• Streptavidin Enrichment: Incubate a portion of the lysate with streptavidin beads for 1 hour at room temperature.
• Validation:
  • Western Blot: Analyze input lysates and bound fractions by streptavidin-HRP to check global biotinylation levels. POI-TurboID should show enhanced biotinylation compared to the TurboID-only control.
  • Mass Spectrometry: Process the remainder of the streptavidin-enriched samples for quantitative MS (e.g., TMT labeling). Compare protein abundances between POI-TurboID and TurboID-only samples, considering proteins with a significant fold-change (e.g., >4-fold) and statistical significance (e.g., p-value < 0.05) as high-confidence hits [51].

Protocol 2: Specificity Controls for CaST (Ca²⁺-activated split-TurboID) In Vivo

CaST rapidly tags neurons activated during a specific time window defined by biotin delivery, allowing correlation of activity history with proteomic or transcriptomic data [5] [45].

A. Reagent Preparation

• CaST AAV vector (CaST-IRES is recommended for balanced expression of fragments) [5].
• Biotin solution (sterile, for intraperitoneal or intravenous injection).
• Anesthetic and surgical equipment for intracerebral injections.

B. Experimental Procedure

• Stereotactic Injection: Inject AAV-CaST into the target brain region (e.g., prefrontal cortex) of mice.
• Activity Labeling:
  • After sufficient expression (e.g., 3-4 weeks), administer the stimulus (e.g., psilocybin) [5].
  • Immediately following stimulus onset, inject biotin (e.g., 50 mg/kg, i.p.) to define the activity-labeling window (e.g., 10-30 minutes).
• Control Groups:
  • Group 1 (Experimental): Stimulus + Biotin.
  • Group 2 (Biotin Control): No stimulus + Biotin. Controls for labeling caused by biotin alone.
  • Group 3 (Stimulus Control): Stimulus + No Biotin. Controls for endogenous biotinylation.
• Tissue Collection and Analysis: Perfuse and collect brain tissue shortly after the labeling period. The CaST signal can be read out immediately.
  • Immunohistochemistry: Use fluorescently conjugated streptavidin to visualize biotinylated cells. Signal should be prominent in Group 1 only.
  • Flow Cytometry: Dissociate tissue, stain with streptavidin-fluorophore, and use the biotin signal to sort activated neurons for downstream single-cell RNA-seq [5].

The following diagram illustrates the CaST mechanism and its critical control conditions.

Protocol 3: Enhancing Specificity in RNA-Protein Interaction Mapping with HyPro2

The enhanced HyPro (HyPro2) technology profiles proteomes associated with single RNA molecules, requiring stringent controls to limit label diffusion [74].

A. Reagent Preparation

• HyPro2 enzyme (APX derivative with D14K and K112E mutations for higher activity).
• Digoxigenin (DIG)-modified antisense oligonucleotides targeting the RNA of interest.
• Biotin-phenol and H₂O₂.
• Labeling buffer with 50% trehalose (to limit diffusion without severely inhibiting enzyme activity) [74].

B. Experimental Procedure

• Cell Fixation and Permeabilization: Fix cells (e.g., patient-derived iPSCs) and permeabilize to allow probe access.
• Hybridization: Incubate cells with DIG-modified antisense oligonucleotides.
• HyPro2 Labeling:
  • Incubate with HyPro2 enzyme, which binds the DIG probes.
  • Add biotin-phenol and initiate labeling with H₂O₂ in trehalose-containing buffer for 1 minute.
• Specificity Controls:
  • Scrambled Oligo Control: Use a non-targeting DIG-oligo to assess background from non-specific oligo binding or enzyme activity.
  • No Oligo Control: Omit the targeting oligonucleotide to measure background labeling.
• Cell Lysis and Streptavidin Enrichment: Lyse cells and proceed with streptavidin-based enrichment and mass spectrometry analysis as in Protocol 1.

Table 2: Quantitative Benchmarks for Specificity in Proximity Labeling

Parameter	Target Benchmark	Method for Calculation/Analysis
Labeling Time	TurboID: 10-30 min; APEX2: 1 min [51] [5]	Titrate time vs. signal and viability.
Fold-Change over Control	> 4-fold [51]	Quantitative proteomics (e.g., TMT, LFQ).
Background (Endogenous Biotin)	Minimized via genetic tagging or antibody depletion [51]	Western blot for carboxylases in enriched samples.
AUC from ROC Analysis	> 0.9 for distinguishing activated cells [5]	Flow cytometry data from tools like CaST.
Diffusion Radius	Micrometer scale for QMID [75]	Microscopy to measure label spread from bait cell.

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Reagents and Solutions

Table 3: Key Research Reagent Solutions for Proximity Labeling Validation

Reagent / Tool	Function	Example Use Case
TurboID / split-TurboID	Engineered biotin ligase for rapid labeling in vivo.	General proteome mapping; CaST for activity recording [51] [5].
APEX2 / HyPro2	Engineered peroxidase for ultra-fast labeling with electron microscopy compatibility.	Mapping organelle contact sites; RNA-protein interactomes [51] [74].
gFMeQM-biotin	Enzyme-activatable QM precursor with tuned diffusion radius.	Cellular-scale proximity labeling with QMID [75].
Trehalose-based Labeling Buffer	High-viscosity buffer to limit diffusion of reactive species.	Enhancing spatial specificity in HyPro2 experiments [74].
Streptavidin Magnetic Beads	High-affinity capture of biotinylated proteins.	Enriching labeled proteins for mass spectrometry in all protocols.
Tandem Mass Tag (TMT) Reagents	Multiplexed quantitative proteomics.	Accurately comparing protein abundance across multiple samples/controls [62].

Data Analysis and Validation Workflow

Post-enrichment data analysis requires a rigorous pipeline to convert raw mass spectrometry data into a list of high-confidence proximal interactors. The following workflow integrates key specificity checks.

The power of proximity labeling to decode the molecular architecture of the brain and record cellular activity history is undeniable [51] [5]. As these techniques become increasingly integral to neuroscience and drug discovery, adhering to rigorous specificity controls is not optional—it is fundamental. The consistent application of well-designed negative controls, optimization of labeling conditions, implementation of peptide-level enrichment, and use of orthogonal validation will ensure that proximity labeling datasets are accurate, reproducible, and biologically meaningful. By following these best practices, researchers can confidently leverage these innovative tools to uncover novel therapeutic targets and advance our understanding of the brain in health and disease.

In the evolving field of cellular activity history research, biochemical tagging techniques such as Ca2+-activated split-TurboID (CaST) have emerged as powerful tools for labeling activated cells in living organisms [45]. These methods enable the precise marking of neuronal populations engaged during specific behaviors or drug responses, such as tagging prefrontal cortex neurons activated by psilocybin [45]. However, the full potential of these approaches is only realized through rigorous verification and identification of the tagged proteins and their post-translational modifications (PTMs). Mass spectrometry (MS)-based proteomics has become the methodology of choice for this critical verification step, offering the sensitivity, specificity, and throughput required to decode the complex protein signatures underlying cellular activation histories.

This application note provides detailed protocols and analytical frameworks for confirming tagged proteins and their PTMs using advanced mass spectrometry techniques. We focus specifically on the verification needs within biochemical tagging research, providing structured workflows for sample preparation, liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) analysis, and data interpretation that are directly applicable to CaST and similar tagging technologies.

Key Research Reagent Solutions

The following table details essential reagents and materials required for mass spectrometry verification of tagged proteins and PTMs:

Table 1: Key Research Reagent Solutions for MS-Based Verification

Reagent/Material	Function/Application	Examples/Specifications
Trypsin	Proteolytic digestion of proteins into peptides for LC-MS/MS analysis [76]	High sequencing grade; specific cleavage after lysine and arginine
Biotin	Tag delivery molecule for CaST system; covalently attached to activated proteins [45]	Exogenously delivered to label cells with elevated Ca2+
TurboID Enzyme	Catalyzes biotin tagging in Ca2+-activated cells [45]	Split-TurboID system activated by calcium elevation
Anti-Diglycine-K Antibody	Enrichment of ubiquitinated peptides for PTM analysis [76]	Immunoaffinity purification; detects >19,000 ubiquitination sites
Phospho-Specific Antibodies	Enrichment of tyrosine-phosphorylated peptides [76]	Immunoaffinity purification; targets phosphotyrosine residues
Immobilized Metal Affinity Chromatography (IMAC)	Enrichment of phosphopeptides (serine/threonine phosphorylation) [76]	Metal cations (Ga3+, Ti4+) bind negatively charged phosphopeptides
Titanium Dioxide (TiO2)	Enrichment of phosphopeptides [76]	Alternative to IMAC for phosphopeptide isolation
RIPA Lysis Buffer	Protein extraction from tissue samples [77]	Cell lysis and protein solubilization
Solid-Phase Extraction Column	Sample cleanup and peptide purification pre-LC-MS/MS [77]	MonoSpin C18 column for desalting and concentration
Isobaric Tags (TMT, iTRAQ)	Multiplexed quantitative proteomics [78] [79]	Allows comparison of multiple samples in single MS run

The following diagram illustrates the comprehensive workflow for mass spectrometry verification of tagged proteins and PTMs, from sample preparation through data analysis:

Detailed Experimental Protocols

Sample Preparation Protocol

Objective: To extract, digest, and prepare protein samples from biotin-tagged tissues for LC-MS/MS analysis, with specific consideration for CaST-tagged samples [45].

Materials:

• RIPA lysis buffer (Nacalai Tesque) [77]
• Guanidine hydrochloride (6 M)
• Dithiothreitol (DTT, 500 mM)
• Iodoacetamide (500 mM)
• Trypsin solution (Promega, 1.0 μg/μL) [77]
• Tris-HCl buffer (1 M, pH 8.0)
• Trifluoroacetic acid (10%)
• MonoSpin C18 columns (GL Sciences) [77]
• Ethanol/H2O/trifluoroacetic acid (60:40:0.1) elution solution

Procedure:

• Tissue Homogenization: Homogenize frozen tissue samples (5-10 mg) in RIPA lysis buffer on ice. Centrifuge at 10,000 × g for 10 minutes at 4°C and collect supernatant [77].
• Protein Reduction: Add 10 μL supernatant to 40 μL of 6 M Guanidine, 1 μL of 500 mM DTT, and 1 μL of 1 M Tris-HCl. Incubate at 60°C for 30 minutes [77].
• Protein Alkylation: Add 2 μL of 500 mM iodoacetamide and incubate at room temperature for 30 minutes in the dark [77].
• SDS Removal: Add alkylated solution to 100 μL SDS remover, centrifuge at 14,000 × g for 5 minutes at 4°C, and collect supernatant [77].
• Trypsin Digestion: Adjust supernatant to pH 8 with 200 mM Tris-HCl. Add 5 μL of 1.0 μg/μL trypsin solution and digest at 37°C overnight [77].
• Digestion Termination: Stop reaction with 10 μL of 10% trifluoroacetic acid and adjust total volume to 500 μL with H2O.
• Sample Cleanup: Condition MonoSpin C18 column with 200 μL of 0.2% trifluoroacetic acid. Load sample, wash with 200 μL of 0.2% trifluoroacetic acid, and elute with 200 μL of ethanol/H2O/trifluoroacetic acid (60:40:0.1) [77].

Enrichment Strategies for Tagged Proteins and PTMs

Objective: To isolate biotin-tagged proteins and specific PTMs to enable comprehensive MS analysis.

Table 2: PTM Enrichment Strategies for Mass Spectrometry Analysis

Enrichment Strategy	Target PTM	Principle/Methodology	Performance Metrics
Streptavidin Capture	Biotin-tagged proteins (CaST system)	High-affinity biotin-streptavidin interaction	Isolates Ca2+-activated proteins; 10-min labeling [45]
Antibody-Based	Tyrosine phosphorylation [76]	Immunoaffinity purification with phospho-specific antibodies	Enables quantitative profiling of hundreds of sites [76]
Antibody-Based	Lysine ubiquitination [76]	Anti-diglycine-K antibody recognizing GG-K remnant	>19,000 ubiquitination sites in single workflow [76]
Antibody-Based	Lysine/arginine methylation [76]	Antibodies targeting mono-/di-/trimethylated moieties	Comprehensive mapping of human methylome [76]
Ionic Interaction (IMAC)	Serine/threonine phosphorylation [76]	Metal cations bind negatively charged phosphopeptides	Identifies ~197,000 human phosphorylation sites [76]
Ionic Interaction (TiO2)	Serine/threonine phosphorylation [76]	Metal oxide affinity for phosphopeptides	Complementary to IMAC; improved enrichment [76]
Sequential Elution (SIMAC)	Multiply phosphorylated peptides [76]	Combines IMAC and TiO2 in sequence	Separates mono-from multiply phosphorylated peptides [76]
Enzymatic (Subtiligase)	Proteolytic cleavage sites [76]	Biotinylation of new N-termini after proteolysis	Identified >8,000 proteolytic sites including 1,700 caspase sites [76]

LC-MS/MS Analysis Protocol

Objective: To separate, ionize, and fragment peptides for protein identification and PTM localization.

Materials:

• ExionLC AC system (AB SCIEX) [77]
• Waters Acquity UPLC CSH C18 column (2.1 mm × 150 mm, 1.7 μm) [77]
• X500R QTOF mass spectrometer (AB SCIEX) [77]
• Mobile phase A: Water with 0.1% formic acid
• Mobile phase B: Acetonitrile with 0.1% formic acid

Chromatographic Conditions:

• Flow rate: 0.25 mL/min [77]
• Column temperature: 40°C [77]
• Injection volume: 30 μL [77]
• Gradient program:
  • 0-0.5 min: 3% B (hold)
  • 0.5-8 min: 3-65% B (linear increase)
  • 8-10 min: 65-90% B (linear increase)
  • 10-12.5 min: 90% B (hold) [77]

Mass Spectrometer Parameters:

• Ionization mode: Electrospray ionization (positive ion mode) [77]
• Ion spray voltage: 5500 V [77]
• Curtain gas: 30 psi [77]
• Collision gas: 7 [77]
• Nebulizer gas: 30 psi [77]
• Heater gas: 40 psi [77]
• Source temperature: 300°C [77]
• Data acquisition: High-resolution multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) [77]

The following diagram illustrates the instrumental workflow and data acquisition strategy:

Data Analysis and Interpretation

Quantitative Data Analysis Workflow

Objective: To process raw MS data for protein identification, quantification, and PTM localization.

Modern quantitative proteomics data is typically processed using workflow-based systems that enable reproducible computational analyses [78]. The quantms workflow, implemented within the nf-core framework, provides a comprehensive solution for distributed analysis in cloud or HPC environments [78]. The key steps include:

• Peptide Identification: Matching fragment spectra to protein databases using search engines like MaxQuant [78].
• Peptide Quantification: Extracting ion chromatograms (label-free) or reporter ions (isobaric tags) for quantitative measurements [78] [79].
• Protein Inference: Grouping proteins based on peptide sharing and aggregating quantitative values [78].
• Statistical Analysis: Performing normalization, imputation, and significance testing with tools like MSstats [78].

The QFeatures package in R/Bioconductor provides a specialized data structure for managing the relationship between different levels of quantitative features (PSMs → peptides → proteins) throughout the analysis pipeline [79].

Performance Benchmarks and Validation

Objective: To establish quality control metrics and validate MS verification results.

Table 3: Quantitative Performance Metrics for MS-Based Verification

Analysis Type	Performance Metrics	Reported Values	Validation Approach
CK19 Detection for Lymph Node Metastasis	Sensitivity: 87.5%; Specificity: 91.2% [77]	Mutual concordance with histopathology: 90.1% [77]	Comparison with gold standard histopathology [77]
Ubiquitination Site Detection	>19,000 sites in single workflow [76]	Coverage of human ubiquitinome	Antibody-based enrichment validation [76]
Phosphorylation Site Detection	~197,000 human sites identified [76]	86% Ser, 12% Thr, 2% Tyr distribution [76]	Metal-based enrichment efficiency [76]
Proteolytic Cleavage Site Detection	>8,000 sites including 1,700 caspase sites [76]	Specificity for new N-termini	Enzymatic labeling validation [76]
CaST-Based Tagging	10-minute labeling time [45]	Signal proportional to Ca2+ concentration and biotin time [45]	Correlation with behavioral assays (head-twitch response) [45]

Application to Biochemical Tagging Research

The verification workflows described herein are particularly crucial for biochemical tagging approaches like Ca2+-activated split-TurboID (CaST), which labels cells with elevated calcium levels in vivo within 10 minutes [45]. Unlike transcriptional reporters that require hours to produce signal, CaST enables immediate readout after activity labeling, making rapid verification essential [45].

Mass spectrometry verification in this context serves two critical functions:

• Confirming Target Engagement: Validating that the biotin tagging specifically marks proteins in activated cells, such as prefrontal cortex neurons responding to psilocybin [45].
• Identifying Signaling Networks: Revealing the full complement of proteins and PTMs associated with cellular activation, providing systems-level understanding of drug responses or behavioral states.

The enrichment strategies and LC-MS/MS protocols outlined here can be directly applied to CaST-tagged samples, enabling researchers to not only verify successful tagging but also to discover novel components of activated cellular networks. This integrated approach—combining in vivo biochemical tagging with comprehensive mass spectrometry verification—represents a powerful paradigm for mapping cellular activity history and its molecular correlates in freely behaving animals.

In the evolving field of biochemical tagging of cellular activity history in vivo, the selection of an appropriate tagging strategy is paramount for research success. Two principal families of technologies dominate this landscape: enzymatic tagging and immunoaffinity-based tagging. Enzymatic methods, particularly proximity-dependent labeling tools such as TurboID and APEX, utilize engineered enzymes to covalently tag biomolecules within a defined cellular radius [51] [18]. In contrast, immunoaffinity-based techniques, including immunoprecipitation and affinity chromatography, rely on high-affinity antibody-antigen interactions to isolate target proteins from complex mixtures [80]. This application note provides a structured comparison of these methodologies, detailing their respective strengths and weaknesses, and offers detailed protocols for their implementation within the specific context of recording cellular activity histories in living organisms. The ability to capture historical cellular activity, such as neuronal firing or signaling events, requires tools that are not only specific and sensitive but also compatible with the complex physiology of living systems [5].

Fundamental Mechanisms

Enzymatic Tagging mechanisms are characterized by an enzyme, genetically fused to a protein or organelle of interest, that catalyzes the labeling of nearby proteins with a reactive probe. The Ca2+-activated split-TurboID (CaST) system is a prime example, where the two halves of the TurboID enzyme are fused to calmodulin (CaM) and an M13 peptide. Upon calcium influx, CaM binds to M13, reconstituting TurboID activity and enabling biotinylation of proximal proteins only during a user-defined window of biotin delivery [5] [15]. Similarly, APEX/APEX2 are peroxidases that use hydrogen peroxide to oxidize biotin-phenol into phenoxyl radicals, which covalently react with electron-rich tyrosine residues on nearby proteins within a short timescale (e.g., 1 minute) and a radius of approximately 20 nm [63] [18].

Immunoaffinity-Based Tagging relies on the specific binding between an antibody and an epitope tag that has been genetically introduced to the protein of interest. Common tags include poly-histidine (His-tag), FLAG, and HA. Immunoprecipitation (IP) and co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP) use antibodies immobilized on beads to pull down the target protein and its direct interacting partners from a cell lysate [80]. Affinity chromatography, such as Immobilized Metal Affinity Chromatography (IMAC) for His-tagged proteins, leverages the interaction between the tag and an immobilized ligand on a chromatographic matrix to purify the protein from a complex mixture [81] [80].

Structured Quantitative Comparison

Table 1: Head-to-Head Comparison of Key Tagging Technologies

Parameter	Enzymatic (e.g., TurboID/CaST)	Enzymatic (e.g., APEX2)	Immunoaffinity (e.g., IP/Co-IP)	Immunoaffinity (e.g., IMAC)
Spatial Resolution	~10 nm [51]	~20 nm [18]	N/A (Purification from lysate)	N/A (Purification from lysate)
Temporal Resolution	Minutes (CaST: <10 min) [5]	~1 Minute [18]	Hours (Includes lysis & incubation)	Hours (Includes lysis & purification)
Application In Vivo	Excellent (e.g., CaST in mouse brain) [5]	Limited by H₂O₂ toxicity [63]	Poor (Requires tissue homogenization)	Poor (Requires tissue homogenization)
Labeling Efficiency	High (Catalytic)	High (Catalytic)	Dependent on antibody affinity & abundance	Dependent on tag accessibility
Background/Noise	Can be high; requires optimization [51]	Non-specific labeling by endogenous peroxidases [63]	Non-specific binding to beads/antibody [80]	Non-specific metal binding [80]
Key Advantage	Records dynamic history in live animals	Ultra-fast, EM compatibility	High specificity for known complexes	Scalable, cost-effective for purification
Primary Limitation	Endogenous biotin background	H₂O₂-induced cellular toxicity	Cannot capture transient interactions in situ	Requires recombinant tag, limited to in vitro

Table 2: Suitability for Tagging Cellular Activity History

Research Goal	Recommended Technology	Rationale
Rapid, time-gated recording of activity (e.g., Ca²⁺ spikes)	CaST (Enzymatic)	Acts as a coincidence detector for Ca²⁺ and biotin; tags within 10 min in freely behaving animals [5]
High-resolution spatial proteomics of microdomains	APEX2/iAPEX (Enzymatic)	Provides high spatial resolution (~20 nm); iAPEX reduces H₂O₂ toxicity for broader application [63]
Mapping stable protein complexes from homogenates	Co-IP (Immunoaffinity)	Excellent for isolating established, stable interactions with high specificity when high-quality antibodies are available [80]
High-yield purification of recombinant protein	IMAC (Immunoaffinity)	Robust, scalable, and cost-effective for obtaining large amounts of pure protein for in vitro structural or biochemical studies [81] [80]

Detailed Experimental Protocols

Protocol for Enzymatic Tagging with CaST

The following protocol outlines the procedure for labeling neurons activated by a specific stimulus in live mice using the CaST system [5].

Workflow Overview:

Step-by-Step Procedure:

• Viral Delivery and Expression:

  • Construct: Package the optimized CaST-IRES construct into an adeno-associated virus (AAV). This bicistronic vector ensures coordinated expression of both CD4-sTb(C)-M13-GFP and CaM-V5-sTb(N) fragments from a single promoter [5].
  • Stereotaxic Injection: Perform intracranial injection of the AAV into the brain region of interest (e.g., prefrontal cortex) in mice. Allow 2-4 weeks for robust and stable expression of the CaST system in neurons.

• Activity Labeling Window:

  • Administer Stimulus: Expose the animal to the desired experimental stimulus (e.g., psilocybin to induce head-twitch response) [5].
  • Intraperitoneal Biotin Injection: Simultaneously with, or immediately following the stimulus onset, inject biotin intraperitoneally (dose range: 10-50 mg/kg). Biotin is cell-permeable and crosses the blood-brain barrier efficiently. The labeling time window can be as short as 10 minutes.

• Tissue Processing and Analysis:

  • Perfusion and Fixation: Shortly after the biotin labeling window, transcardially perfuse the animal with ice-cold PBS followed by 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA). Dissect and post-fix the brain.
  • Detection:
    • For Imaging: Section the brain and immunostain using Streptavidin conjugated to Alexa Fluor 647 (SA-647, 1:1000 dilution) to visualize biotinylated proteins. Co-staining with other markers (e.g., NeuN for neurons) allows for cell-type identification [5].
    • For Proteomics: Homogenize fresh or frozen tissue in RIPA lysis buffer. Enrich biotinylated proteins using streptavidin-coated magnetic beads. After stringent washing, elute proteins and identify them by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS).

Protocol for Immunoaffinity-Based IMAC Purification

This protocol describes the use of Immobilized Metal Affinity Chromatography (IMAC) for purifying His-tagged proteins from cell lysates, coupled with native mass spectrometry analysis [81].

Workflow Overview:

Step-by-Step Procedure:

• Protein Overexpression and Lysis:

  • Expression: Transform E. coli BL21(DE3) with a plasmid encoding the protein of interest with an N- or C-terminal His₆-tag. Grow a 5 mL culture to OD₆₀₀ ~0.6 and induce expression with 0.1-1.0 mM IPTG. Grow post-induction at an optimized temperature and duration [81].
  • Lysis: Harvest cells by centrifugation. Resuspend the pellet in 400 µL of 1X PBS supplemented with a protease inhibitor cocktail. Lyse cells by sonication on ice. Clarify the lysate by centrifugation at 20,000 x g for 30 minutes at 4°C to remove insoluble debris.

• IMAC-OBE-nMS Analysis:

  • Chromatography Setup: Use a UHPLC system with a Ni²⁺-charged IMAC column (e.g., ProPac IMAC-10). Equilibrate the column with a mobile phase of 200 mM ammonium acetate, pH 7.5, at a flow rate of 100 µL/min [81].
  • Sample Loading and Elution: Load the clarified cell lysate onto the IMAC column. Wash with 200 mM ammonium acetate to remove unbound proteins. Elute the bound His-tagged protein using a pulse of 3 µL of 5 M imidazole (pH 7.5).
  • Online Buffer Exchange (OBE) and MS: Direct the eluent through a self-packed size exclusion chromatography (SEC) column (e.g., P6 gel medium) to perform online buffer exchange into 200 mM ammonium acetate, effectively removing the imidazole. Analyze the desalted protein directly using a native mass spectrometer (e.g., Q Exactive UHMR) with settings tuned for intact protein analysis [81].

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Research Reagents

Table 3: Key Reagents for Enzymatic and Immunoaffinity Tagging

Reagent / Solution	Function / Role	Example Specifics
CaST Plasmid (AAV)	Delivers the genetic construct for in vivo expression of the tagging system.	Bicistronic CaST-IRES vector for balanced fragment expression [5].
Biotin	Small molecule substrate for TurboID. Becomes covalently attached to proximal proteins.	Cell-permeable, blood-brain barrier permeable. Administered via IP injection (10-50 mg/kg) [5].
Streptavidin-Conjugates	Detection and enrichment of biotinylated proteins.	Streptavidin-Alexa Fluor 647 for imaging; Streptavidin-magnetic beads for proteomics [5].
D-Alanine / DAAO System	Component of the iAPEX system for local H₂O₂ generation, reducing toxicity.	Substrate for D-amino acid oxidase (DAAO); enables specific APEX2 activation without exogenous H₂O₂ [63].
His-Tag Plasmid	Enables recombinant expression of the protein fused to an affinity tag.	Standard cloning vector with N- or C-terminal His₆-tag for IMAC purification [81].
IMAC Resin/Column	Solid support with immobilized metal ions for capturing His-tagged proteins.	Ni²⁺ or Co²⁺ charged resin (e.g., ProPac IMAC-10) [81] [80].
Imidazole	Competes with the His-tag for metal binding, used for elution in IMAC.	Used in a step or gradient (e.g., 50-500 mM) to elute the purified protein [81].
Native MS Buffer	Volatile salt buffer compatible with mass spectrometry.	200 mM ammonium acetate, pH 7.5, preserves non-covalent interactions for native MS [81].

The choice between enzymatic and immunoaffinity-based tagging is not a matter of superiority, but of strategic alignment with research objectives. For the core goal of biochemical tagging of cellular activity history in vivo, enzymatic methods, particularly next-generation tools like CaST and iAPEX, offer unparalleled capabilities. Their temporal resolution, compatibility with live animals, and ability to capture fleeting molecular events make them the definitive choice for mapping functional neural circuits or signaling pathways in behaving organisms. Conversely, immunoaffinity-based techniques remain powerful and indispensable for in vitro applications requiring high-specificity isolation of protein complexes or large-scale purification. As the field advances, the fusion of these approaches—such as using immunoaffinity to validate discoveries from enzymatic in vivo screens—will provide a more holistic and profound understanding of cellular history and its role in health and disease.

Within the context of a broader thesis on biochemical tagging of cellular activity history in in vivo research, precise subcellular localization is paramount. Organelles function as nanoscale biochemical reactors, each maintaining a unique luminal microenvironment that drives specialized functions, from peptide bond formation in the endoplasmic reticulum to ATP synthesis in mitochondria and proteolysis in lysosomes [82]. The ionic milieu and chemical composition of these compartments are fundamental to their function, yet their luminal chemistry has remained largely unexplored until recently due to significant technical challenges [82]. Tagging technologies that can accurately target these specific environments and report on their dynamic states are therefore essential tools for advancing our understanding of cellular activity history, particularly in live-cell imaging and drug development research. These technologies enable researchers to map organelle function in real time, revealing new biology such as chemical heterogeneity in lysosomes and identifying key protein importers [82].

Tag and Reporter Technologies for Subcellular Compartments

DNA Nanodevices for Organelle-Targeted Sensing

DNA nanodevices represent a versatile scaffold for creating modular fluorescent reporters for organelle mapping. These devices typically comprise three to four oligonucleotides that integrate independent functional modules in a fixed stoichiometry, enabled by Watson-Crick-Franklin base pairing [82]. Key modules include: (1) an ion-sensitive dye or detection module for measuring specific analytes; (2) a normalizing reference dye for ratiometric measurements that, combined with the detection module, forms a "measuring module"; and (3) an organelle-targeting module that engages a cognate protein to traffic the entire assembly to a specific organelle lumen [82]. This platform allows measurement of free ion concentrations with unprecedented accuracy in previously inaccessible subcellular locations at single-organelle resolution.

These nanodevices differ fundamentally from conventional small molecule or genetically-encoded sensors. As approximately 35 kDa modular scaffolds, they co-opt scavenger receptor-mediated endocytosis to label each stage of the endolysosomal pathway in a time-dependent manner [82]. They can be re-routed to other organelles such as recycling endosomes or the Golgi apparatus through the use of specific targeting motifs [82]. The platform's modularity enables rapid expansion to new analytes by integrating relevant ion-sensing fluorophores, allowing measurement of multiple organellar ions within short timeframes rather than the historical 130-year gap between the first and second lysosomal ion measurements [82].

Table 1: Core Modules of DNA Nanodevices for Organelle Sensing

Module Type	Key Components	Function	Technical Considerations
Scaffold Module	3-4 synthetic DNA strands	Provides structural framework with 1:1 stoichiometry for component integration	~35 kDa size; water-soluble and biocompatible
Detection Module	Ion-sensitive fluorophore (e.g., Ca²⁺, Cl⁻, pH dyes)	Sensitively detects specific analyte concentrations	Must be selected for target analyte and organelle environment
Measuring Module	Detection fluorophore + normalizing reference dye	Enables ratiometric measurement for quantitative accuracy	Corrects for variations in probe concentration and optical path
Targeting Module	Specific motif engaging cognate organelle proteins	Directs entire assembly to specific organelle lumen	Determines subcellular localization; can be swapped for different organelles

Fluorescent Probes for Super-Resolution Imaging

Small-molecule fluorescent probes for super-resolution imaging, particularly Structured Illumination Microscopy (SIM), require specific design characteristics to achieve high-quality organelle visualization. These design requirements include: (1) high quantum yield in super-resolution imaging to ensure strong signal strength; (2) stable optical properties to support long-term dynamic imaging; (3) narrow spectral characteristics with consideration for larger Stokes shift to improve signal-to-noise ratio; (4) functional groups that specifically bind to subcellular molecules; and (5) organelle-targeting tags to ensure enrichment in specific organelles [83].

These probes typically incorporate a large conjugated structure as a fluorescent group that emits efficient fluorescence signals under excitation light irradiation, chemically linked to a specific binding group that can recognize target molecules or organelle targeting groups within the cell [83]. Through this design, probes can accurately identify and accumulate in target organelles, providing clear super-resolution imaging that enables researchers to observe complex molecular dynamics and organelle functions.

Table 2: Targeting Moieties for Specific Organellar Environments

Target Organelle	Targeting Moieties/Chemical Properties	Targeting Principle	Example Applications
Mitochondria	Triphenylphosphonium (TPP), Rhodamine derivatives	Utilization of negative mitochondrial membrane potential	Imaging energy metabolism, oxidative stress, apoptosis
Lysosomes	Morpholine, weak alkaline groups	Accumulation in acidic environments (pH 4.5-5.0)	Studying autophagy, lysosomal storage disorders, membrane integrity
Endoplasmic Reticulum	Glibenclamide derivatives, DiOC₆(3)	Affinity for ER membrane proteins or lipids	Monitoring calcium dynamics, protein folding, ER stress
Golgi Apparatus	NBD Ceramide, BODIPY FL C₅-Ceramide	Incorporation into Golgi-specific lipids	Tracking protein glycosylation, vesicular transport
Lipid Droplets	Neutral lipophilic dyes (Nile Red, BODIPY 493/503)	High solubility in neutral lipid cores	Studying lipid metabolism, obesity, metabolic diseases
Nucleus	Hoechst stains, DAPI, SYTO RNASelect	Minor groove binding to AT-rich DNA regions	Monitoring nuclear morphology, gene expression, cell division
Plasma Membrane	DiI, DiO, CellMask dyes	Incorporation into lipid bilayer	Studying membrane dynamics, receptor trafficking, cell signaling

Spatial Proteomics for Localization Validation

High-throughput spatial proteomics methods have emerged as powerful tools for validating subcellular localization at proteome scale. Techniques such as DIA-LOP (Data-Independent Acquisition - Localization of Organelle Proteins) integrate differential-ultracentrifugation fractionation with ion-mobility-based data-independent acquisition mass spectrometry [84]. This approach achieves comprehensive spatial mapping with high subcellular resolution, having identified 8,242 proteins across 13 organellar compartments in U-2 OS cells [84].

Alternative methods include global organelle profiling using native immunoprecipitation proteomics, which has been deployed to a cell-wide collection of membranous and membraneless compartments, resolving over 7,600 proteins across 19 subcellular structures and organellar interfaces [85]. These techniques are particularly valuable for detecting proteins that relocate between organelles during cellular activity, altering local availability without changes in total cellular abundance [84].

Experimental Protocols

Protocol: DNA Nanodevice Assembly and Validation for Organellar Ion Measurement

Principle: This protocol describes the assembly and validation of DNA nanodevices for quantitative measurement of ions within specific organelles, enabling real-time mapping of organelle function in living systems [82].

Materials:

• Synthetic DNA oligonucleotides (scaffold strands)
• Ion-sensitive fluorophore-conjugated strands (detection module)
• Reference dye-conjugated strands (normalization module)
• Targeting motif-conjugated strands (organelle-specific module)
• Nuclease-free water or buffer
• Thermal cycler or water bath for annealing
• Cell culture appropriate for experiment
• Confocal or super-resolution microscope with ratiometric capability
• Ionophores for in vivo calibration

Procedure:

• Nanodevice Assembly:

  • Combine scaffold, detection, reference, and targeting strands in equimolar ratios (typically 1-5 µM each) in nuclease-free buffer.
  • Anneal by heating to 90°C for 5 minutes followed by gradual cooling to 4°C over 60-90 minutes in a thermal cycler.
  • Verify assembly success using native polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis.

• Cellular Introduction:

  • Apply assembled nanodevices to cells at appropriate concentration (typically 50-500 nM) in culture medium.
  • Incubate for predetermined time (typically 2-24 hours) to allow cellular uptake and trafficking to target organelles.
  • For endolysosomal pathway targeting, rely on scavenger receptor-mediated endocytosis with time-dependent labeling of different compartments.
  • For other organelles, utilize specific targeting motifs that engage cognate proteins for directed trafficking.

• In Vivo Calibration and Measurement:

  • For intracellular calibration, label organelles with the probe, then use fixed cells clamped at specific ion levels in the presence of ionophores.
  • For validation in live organisms (e.g., C. elegans), modify clamping procedure by gently perforating cuticles without fixing to allow buffer and ionophore access to internal cells.
  • Acquire ratiometric imaging data using appropriate excitation/emission filters for detection and reference fluorophores.
  • Calculate absolute ion concentrations using established calibration curves.

• Data Analysis:

  • Process ratiometric data to generate quantitative ion maps.
  • Analyze spatial and temporal heterogeneity of ion concentrations within and between organelles.
  • Perform statistical analyses to compare conditions or treatments.

Technical Notes:

• The modular design allows rapid adaptation to new analytes by swapping detection modules.
• Targeting modules can be exchanged to redirect nanodevices to different organelles.
• Fixed cell calibration provides stable environment with immobilized cellular structures and set ion concentrations for reproducibility.
• For organelles beyond endolysosomal pathway, specific targeting strategies must be validated.

Protocol: DIA-LOP for Subcellular Spatial Proteome Mapping

Principle: This protocol describes DIA-LOP (Data-Independent Acquisition - Localization of Organelle Proteins), a high-throughput method for in-depth subcellular spatial proteome mapping that integrates differential-ultracentrifugation fractionation with ion-mobility-based data-independent acquisition mass spectrometry [84].

Materials:

• Appropriate cell line (e.g., U-2 OS cells)
• Precise ball-bearing based cell homogenizer
• Fractionation buffer without detergents
• Ultracentrifugation equipment
• µPAC column for liquid chromatography
• Ion mobility-mass spectrometry system
• DIA-NN software for data analysis
• pRoloc bioinformatics pipeline (R package)

Procedure:

• Cell Culture and Lysis:

  • Grow cells in three biological replicates from different culture flasks.
  • Use precise ball-bearing based cell lysis with detergent-free fractionation buffer to maintain organelle integrity.
  • Avoid pestle, mortar, or blender-based lysis methods for higher resolution.

• Biochemical Fractionation:

  • Perform differential-ultracentrifugation (DC) to separate cell lysate into 10 fractions.
  • Follow previous LOPIT-DC method for reproducible centrifugation-based fractionation.
  • Alternative: Compare with detergent-based protocol if required for specific applications.

• Mass Spectrometry Analysis:

  • Aliquot each fraction for label-free DIA analysis.
  • Utilize ion-mobility-based data-independent acquisition mass spectrometry.
  • Employ 62.5 min liquid chromatography gradient with μPAC column coupled with ion mobility separation.
  • For comparison: TMT label each lysate fraction for DDA analysis, pooling 10 fractions before Ultra-Performance Liquid Chromatography separation.

• Data Processing and Spatial Analysis:

  • Process DIA data using DIA-NN software.
  • Implement mixed imputation strategy for biologically expected missing values across separation gradient.
  • Perform spatial analysis within pRoloc bioinformatics pipeline.
  • Retain only proteins found in all three replicates for spatial analysis.

• Data Interpretation:

  • Generate subcellular spatial proteomic maps with 13 organellar compartments.
  • Achieve suborganellar resolution for precise localization.
  • Identify and map disease-related proteins within cell model.
  • Compare coverage and resolution with alternative methods.

Technical Notes:

• DIA-LOP provides increased throughput by eliminating need for isotope labels and associated offline-prefractionation steps.
• Method requires lower cellular input material compared to TMT-based approaches.
• Approach demonstrates high performance in terms of coverage and resolution compared to previous subcellular spatial proteomics workflows.
• Unified framework allows maximum flexibility and traceability in data analysis.

Protocol: Organelle-Targeted Fluorescent Probes for SIM Imaging

Principle: This protocol describes the design and application of organelle-targeted fluorescent probes for Structured Illumination Microscopy (SIM), a super-resolution technique that breaks through the diffraction limit of traditional optical microscopes to achieve nanoscale resolution imaging of subcellular structures [83].

Materials:

• Small-molecule fluorescent probes with high quantum yield
• Appropriate organelle-targeting moieties
• Cell culture appropriate for experiment
• Structured Illumination Microscope system
• Image reconstruction software
• Live-cell imaging chamber (for dynamic studies)

Procedure:

• Probe Design and Selection:

  • Select fluorescent probes with high quantum yield for strong signal in super-resolution imaging.
  • Choose probes with stable optical properties to support long-term dynamic imaging.
  • Prioritize probes with narrow spectral characteristics and larger Stokes shift to improve signal-to-noise ratio.
  • Ensure probes contain functional groups for specific binding to subcellular molecules.
  • Verify inclusion of organelle-targeting tags for specific organelle enrichment.

• Sample Preparation and Labeling:

  • Culture cells on appropriate imaging chambers or coverslips.
  • Apply organelle-targeted fluorescent probes at optimized concentration.
  • Incubate for appropriate time to allow specific organelle accumulation.
  • For live-cell imaging, maintain optimal temperature and CO₂ levels.

• SIM Imaging Acquisition:

  • Illuminate samples with structured light patterns in multiple orientations.
  • Capture multiple raw images with different pattern phases and orientations.
  • Use high-sensitivity cameras to detect emitted fluorescence.
  • For dynamic imaging, optimize acquisition speed to balance temporal resolution and image quality.

• Image Reconstruction and Processing:

  • Process raw SIM data using appropriate reconstruction algorithms.
  • Extract high-frequency information through mathematical processing.
  • Reconstruct super-resolution images with approximately 2x resolution improvement over conventional microscopy.
  • Apply noise reduction and image enhancement techniques as needed.

• Data Analysis and Interpretation:

  • Analyze organelle structures at nanoscale resolution.
  • Track dynamic processes within organelles over time.
  • Quantify morphological parameters and spatial relationships.
  • Correlate structural findings with functional data.

Technical Notes:

• SIM provides advantages over other super-resolution techniques including faster imaging acquisition speed and lower phototoxicity.
• Technique is particularly suitable for dynamic observation of molecular activity in living cells.
• Resolution is typically improved to approximately 100 nm laterally, compared to 200-250 nm for conventional microscopy.
• Compared to STED, STORM, and SMLM, SIM offers wider choice of fluorescent dyes, higher temporal resolution, and significantly higher fluorescent photon utilization.

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Research Reagents and Materials

Table 3: Key Research Reagent Solutions for Organelle Tagging and Imaging

Reagent/Material	Function/Application	Technical Specifications	Considerations for Use
DNA Nanodevice Components	Modular scaffold for organelle-specific sensing	~35 kDa; 3-4 oligonucleotides with 1:1 stoichiometry	Enables ratiometric measurement; targetable to specific organelles
Ion-Sensitive Fluorophores	Detection of specific ions (Ca²⁺, Cl⁻, Na⁺, etc.) in organelles	Must be selected for target analyte and organelle environment	Affected by organelle acidity; requires appropriate binding constants
Organelle-Targeting Motifs	Directed trafficking to specific organelles	Examples: Lysosomes (morpholine), Mitochondria (TPP)	Engagement with cognate organelle proteins for specific localization
Structured Illumination Microscope	Super-resolution imaging beyond diffraction limit	~100 nm resolution; lower phototoxicity than STED/STORM	Requires specific reconstruction algorithms; good for live cells
DIA Mass Spectrometry System	High-throughput spatial proteomics	Ion-mobility separation; data-independent acquisition	Enables label-free analysis; higher coverage than DDA methods
pRoloc Bioinformatics Pipeline	Spatial analysis of subcellular proteomics data	R package for spatial proteomics	Handles missing values; provides subcellular assignment
Differential Ultracentrifugation System	Organelle fractionation for spatial proteomics	Precise centrifugation parameters; 10 fractions recommended	Maintains organelle integrity; detergent-free buffers preferred
μPAC Chromatography Columns	Separation for proteomic analysis	Used with 62.5 min LC gradient; high sensitivity	Optimized for proteome coverage in DIA-LOP workflow

Technical Considerations and Challenges Across Cellular Environments

Addressing the Measurement Challenges in Organellar Environments

Successful tagging and imaging across different cellular environments requires overcoming several significant technical challenges:

• The Measurement Problem: Quantitative measurement presents greater challenges than simple detection, requiring ratiometric sensors and validation methods for in vivo calibration prior to measuring absolute ion levels [82]. Intracellular calibration typically uses fixed cells clamped at specific ion levels with ionophores, providing a stable environment with immobilized cellular structures for reproducibility [82].

• The Russian Doll Problem: Accessing the approximately 20 attoliter volume of an organelle inside a cell within an organism presents multiple biological barriers that extraneously introduced probes must overcome to reach specific organelle lumens in particular cell types [82].

• The Black Box Problem: Designing reporters to measure ion levels without prior knowledge of expected concentrations requires sensors spanning appropriate concentration ranges, as physiological ion concentrations can span five orders of magnitude (as with Ca²⁺) while typical sensors measure only 1.5-2 orders of magnitude [82].

• The Acidity Problem: Most organelles are acidic, and acidity interferes with nearly every ion detection chemistry, requiring specialized probe design and calibration approaches [82].

Selection Criteria for Tagging Technologies

Choosing appropriate tagging strategies requires consideration of multiple factors:

• Modularity vs. Integration: DNA nanodevices offer exceptional modularity, allowing independent integration of targeting, detection, and normalization functionalities [82], while small-molecule fluorescent probes provide more integrated designs with specific organelle affinity [83].

• Genetic Encoding Requirements: Genetically-encoded probes (e.g., GECIs) require genetic manipulation but provide cell-type specific expression, while extraneously introduced probes (DNA nanodevices, small-molecule fluorophores) enable studies in systems where genetic manipulation is challenging [82] [84].

• Resolution vs. Phototoxicity Trade-offs: SIM provides a balance of improved resolution (~100 nm) with lower phototoxicity suitable for live-cell imaging, while techniques like STORM offer higher resolution (~20 nm) but with greater photobleaching concerns and slower imaging speeds [83].

• Throughput vs. Resolution in Proteomics: DIA-LOP offers high-throughput spatial proteomics with extensive coverage (8,242 proteins) and reasonable resolution across 13 compartments [84], while methods like global organelle profiling provide higher resolution across 19 subcellular structures but with different technical requirements [85].

Conclusion

Biochemical tagging technologies have fundamentally transformed our ability to capture and analyze cellular activity history in vivo. The advent of rapid, enzyme-catalyzed tools like CaST provides an unprecedented, non-invasive window into dynamic processes, from neural circuit activation to subcellular proteome remodeling. As these methods continue to evolve—addressing challenges in specificity and toxicity—their integration will be crucial for mapping disease-relevant signaling pathways, identifying novel drug targets, and ultimately paving the way for personalized therapeutic strategies. The future of this field lies in developing next-generation tags with even greater spatiotemporal control, multiplexing capabilities, and compatibility with diverse physiological systems, promising to unlock new frontiers in biomedical research and clinical application.

References

• 1. Calcium imaging in retinal research: challenges and ... [https://www.aimspress.com/article/id/69153e64ba35de34708ade17]
• 2. Leveraging calcium imaging to illuminate circuit dysfunction in ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7575247/]
• 3. Calcium imaging [https://www.neurotar.com/contract-research/calcium-imaging-proxy-for-neuronal-activity/]
• 4. Cutting-edge methodologies for tagging and tracing active ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0959438825000285]
• 5. Rapid, biochemical tagging of cellular activity history in vivo [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41592-024-02375-7]
• 6. Calcium Dynamics in Hypothalamic Paraventricular ... [https://www.eneuro.org/content/12/5/ENEURO.0196-24.2025]
• 7. Rapid, biochemical tagging of cellular activity history in vivo [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39103446/]
• 8. Longitudinal tracking of neuronal activity from the same ... [https://elifesciences.org/reviewed-preprints/107540]
• 9. Rapid, biochemical of tagging in vivo cellular activity history [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41592-024-02375-7?error=cookies_not_supported&code=1148c1ea-1917-4c97-a308-1ad1fdd8b7bc]
• 10. Noninvasive strategies of cell-tracking in vivo [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0165993624000980]
• 11. Addgene: Rapid, biochemical of tagging in... cellular activity history [https://www.addgene.org/browse/article/28247829/]
• 12. Non-invasive chimeric HaloTag labeling to study clustering ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9676207/]
• 13. Delix Therapeutics on LinkedIn: Rapid, biochemical of... tagging [https://www.linkedin.com/posts/delix-therapeutics_rapid-biochemical-tagging-of-cellular-activity-activity-7229124654475423744-3LBg]
• 14. How Non-invasive in vivo Cell Tracking Supports ... [https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/physiology/articles/10.3389/fphys.2020.00154/full]
• 15. Rapid, biochemical of tagging - PMC cellular activity history in vivo [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11118534/]
• 16. Split-TurboID enables contact-dependent proximity ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7275672/]
• 17. Proximity labeling in mammalian cells with TurboID and split-TurboID - PubMed [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33139955/]
• 18. The development of proximity labeling technology and its ... [https://biosignaling.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12964-023-01310-1]
• 19. Proximity labeling - Wikipedia [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proximity_labeling]
• 20. Efficient proximity labeling in living cells and organisms ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6126969/]
• 21. Cell-type and subcellular compartment-specific APEX2 ... [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-021-25144-y]
• 22. Advances in enzyme-mediated proximity labeling and its ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8825456/]
• 23. Molecular tools to capture active neural circuits - PMC [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11294111/]
• 24. A Molecular Calcium Integrator Reveals a Striatal Cell ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0092867420315324]
• 25. A molecular calcium integrator reveals a striatal cell-type ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9839359/]
• 26. New Method Tracks How Psychedelics Affect Neurons in ... [https://www.ucdavis.edu/news/new-method-tracks-how-psychedelics-affect-neurons-minutes]
• 27. Rapid Tagging Method Reveals Psychedelics' Immediate ... [https://www.technologynetworks.com/drug-discovery/news/rapid-tagging-method-reveals-psychedelics-immediate-effects-on-neurons-389466]
• 28. New Tool Rapidly Tracks Psychedelic Effects in Brain ... [https://neurosciencenews.com/cast-psychedelics-neurons-27516/]
• 29. Neural mechanisms underlying psilocybin's therapeutic potential [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9247433/]
• 30. Psilocybin treatment extends cellular lifespan and ... [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41514-025-00244-x]
• 31. Protein Self-Labeling with Halo, SNAP, and CLIP Tagging [https://bitesizebio.com/38072/halo-snap-and-clip-tagging-powerful-technologies-for-protein-labeling/]
• 32. Visualizing and Manipulating Biological Processes Using ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7367766/]
• 33. SNAP-tag® Technologies: Tools to Study Protein Function [https://www.neb.com/en-us/tools-and-resources/feature-articles/snap-tag-technologies-novel-tools-to-study-protein-function?srsltid=AfmBOorC2jaiIg8LgW2vMrX2ef5pk0u8FY25v4dJ03dXutT49JPxZckV]
• 34. SNAP-tag and CLIP-tag overview [https://www.ptglab.com/news/blog/snap-tag-and-clip-tag-overview/?srsltid=AfmBOorm_tpO_93gk6icjN66EWk_YuOTamV-8EbCd6s9_XZApErw_wqU]
• 35. A Comparison between HaloTags and SNAP-tags - PMC [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6474801/]
• 36. SNAP-tag2 for faster and brighter protein labeling [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41589-025-01942-z]
• 37. Evaluation of Fluorophores to Label SNAP-Tag Fused ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006349514006869]
• 38. Utilizing small molecules to probe and harness the proteome ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12230046/]
• 39. Global, quantitative and dynamic mapping of protein ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4959882/]
• 40. Organellar Maps Through Proteomic Profiling - PubMed Central [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7338086/]
• 41. A Quantitative Proteomics Analysis of Subcellular ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1535947620308252]
• 42. Advances in ciliary proteomics – towards cracking the hidden ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12633740/]
• 43. An enzymatic cascade enables sensitive and specific ... [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-025-65405-8]
• 44. Rapid, biochemical tagging of cellular activity history in vivo [https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1b9944cq]
• 45. Rapid, biochemical tagging of cellular activity history in vivo [https://collaborate.princeton.edu/en/publications/rapid-biochemical-tagging-of-cellular-activity-history-in-vivo]
• 46. Effect of biotin on growth performance, serum biochemical ... [https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/veterinary-science/articles/10.3389/fvets.2025.1562325/full]
• 47. Nitroreductase detection and imaging with a biotin-guided ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0925400525008408]
• 48. Large-scale recording of neuronal activity in freely-moving ... [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-023-42083-y]
• 49. From Neurons to Cognition: Technologies for Precise ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10521756/]
• 50. Protocol for labeling and manipulating “home”-activated ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11981720/]
• 51. Bridging molecular and cellular neuroscience with proximity ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12322126/]
• 52. Potentiation of Hydrogen Peroxide Toxicity: From Catalase ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5607474/]
• 53. Protection against hydrogen peroxide-induced cytotoxicity ... [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15051420/]
• 54. Hydrogen peroxide initiates oxidative stress and proteomic ... [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-022-18548-3]
• 55. Resistance to H2O2-induced oxidative stress in human cells ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8818566/]
• 56. Cytotoxic potency of H2O2 in cell cultures [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0891584910004417]
• 57. Cytotoxic and mutagenic potential of solutions exposed to ... [https://www.nature.com/articles/srep21464]
• 58. Mitigation of doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity with an H 2 ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213231722001100]
• 59. A comprehensive toolkit for protein localization and functional ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11961264/]
• 60. Evolving advances of proximity labeling in capturing ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1367593125000614]
• 61. Creative approaches using proximity labeling to gain new ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0968000423003006]
• 62. From Vision to Reality: A Perspective on the Innovative and ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1535947625001446]
• 63. An enzymatic cascade enables sensitive and specific ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12583597/]
• 64. Biotinylation | Thermo Fisher Scientific - US [https://www.thermofisher.com/us/en/home/life-science/protein-biology/protein-biology-learning-center/protein-biology-resource-library/pierce-protein-methods/biotinylation.html]
• 65. A Straightforward Interpretation of Proximity Labeling ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12199003/]
• 66. Adaptation of the Protocol for the Isolation of Biotinylated ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12386920/]
• 67. Enrichment of Cell Surface Proteins Using Biotin [https://www.protocols.io/view/enrichment-of-cell-surface-proteins-using-biotin-hc7nb2zmf.html]
• 68. Protocol to identify endogenous proximal proteins using ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11969400/]
• 69. An enzymatic cascade enables sensitive and specific ... [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41184298/]
• 70. A dual-purification system to isolate mitochondrial ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12045638/]
• 71. Spatiotemporally resolved transcriptomics reveals the ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10172111/]
• 72. In vivo study of gene expression with an enhanced dual-color ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6660218/]
• 73. Benchmarking metabolic RNA labeling techniques for high ... [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-025-61375-z]
• 74. Enhanced hybridization-proximity labeling discovers ... [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-025-64282-5]
• 75. Cellular-scale proximity labeling for recording cell spatial ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10219591/]
• 76. Mass Spectrometry-Based Detection and Assignment of ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4301092/]
• 77. Diagnostic method of mass spectrometry for detecting ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10803216/]
• 78. Quantitative mass spectrometry data analysis [https://docs.quantms.org/en/latest/introduction.html]
• 79. Chapter 5 Quantitative data | R for Mass Spectrometry [https://rformassspectrometry.github.io/book/sec-quant.html]
• 80. IP vs. Affinity Chromatography vs. Pull-Down Assays [https://www.creative-proteomics.com/resource/comparative-analysis-protein-enrichment-techniques.htm]
• 81. Analysis of tagged proteins using tandem affinity-buffer ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9080447/]
• 82. Quantitative Chemical Imaging of Organelles - PMC [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12211986/]
• 83. Advancements and perspectives on organelle-targeted ... [https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlehtml/2025/sc/d5sc04640h]
• 84. Localization of Organelle Proteins Using Data-Independent ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12455123/]
• 85. Global organelle profiling reveals subcellular localization ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0092867424013448]