Decoding Psychosis Through Neurophysiology
Psychosisâa disruption in reality perception marked by hallucinations, delusions, and cognitive chaosâaffects ~3% of people globally. Yet diagnosing it relies on subjective interviews, often after debilitating symptoms emerge. Now, scientists are racing to find objective biomarkers in the brain's electrical signals to predict, prevent, and personalize treatment 1 9 .
Psychosis isn't one disease but a spectrum of disorders (e.g., schizophrenia, bipolar disorder). Delayed treatment worsens outcomes: the average delay is 6â12 months, and over 50% of patients stop medication within two years due to side effects 1 . Biomarkersâmeasurable biological signalsâcould:
Neurophysiological tools like EEG (electroencephalography) are ideal because they're:
Non-invasive
Cost-effective
Millisecond resolution
Measures the brain's ability to filter irrelevant stimuli. In psychosis, this "sensory gating" fails, causing sensory overload.
Detects deviants in sound patterns (e.g., a high-pitched tone amid lows). Generated in 150â200 ms, it reflects pre-attentive prediction.
A 2025 MRI study revealed altered connectivity in somatomotor and visual networks 9 .
Biomarker | Function Tested | Deficit in Psychosis | Clinical Utility |
---|---|---|---|
P50 sensory gating | Sensory filtering | â P50 ratio (reduced inhibition) | Endophenotype; tracks genetic risk 1 |
Mismatch Negativity (MMN) | Prediction error detection | â Amplitude (esp. duration-MMN) | Predicts psychosis onset 3 8 |
LPP emotion response | Emotion regulation | â Regulation via reappraisal/distraction | Tied to symptom severity |
"Somato-visual" connectivity | Sensory network integration | â Thalamocortical connectivity | Diagnostic accuracy >90% 9 |
A landmark 2025 study pinpointed a novel biomarker using 5-minute MRI scans 9 .
159 people (105 with early psychosis, 54 controls)
Measured functional connectivity in sensory networks during rest
Machine learning identified patterns distinguishing psychosis
Brain Network | Connectivity Change | Effect Size | Reliability |
---|---|---|---|
Somatomotor | â Intra-network, â thalamus | Large (d >1.0) | High (scan-rescan) |
Visual | â Intra-network, â thalamus | Large (d >1.0) | High (scan-rescan) |
Combined "Somato-visual" | Machine learning model | 94% accuracy | Robust across sites 9 |
Neurophysiology labs use these tools to decode psychosis:
Tool | Role | Example Use Case |
---|---|---|
64-channel EEG | Records electrical brain activity | Measuring P50/MMN/LPP 1 |
fMRI with resting-state protocols | Maps brain connectivity | Identifying thalamocortical dysconnectivity 9 |
Auditory oddball paradigms | Generates sound deviants | Eliciting MMN responses 3 |
CHRNA7 gene assays | Tests α7-nicotinic receptor variants | Linking P50 deficits to genetics 1 |
Machine learning algorithms | Analyzes brain patterns | Classifying psychosis risk 7 9 |
Advanced MRI techniques reveal functional connectivity patterns that distinguish psychosis patients from controls 9 .
Neurophysiological biomarkers are reshaping psychosis care:
Biomarker profiles may predict drug response (e.g., GABA enhancers for P50 deficits) 1 .
Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) focused on the salience network restored function in trials 7 .
"These discoveries underscore approaching psychosis with compassion. Biomarkers illuminate that this is a brain wiring disorderânot a personal failure."
The quest for psychosis biomarkers merges neuroscience with hope. From EEG microstates to MRI connectivity, each discovery brings us closer to a future where psychosis is intercepted early, treated precisely, and understood deeply. As research accelerates, the brain's electrical whispers may soon become loudspeakers for change.